From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I should learn wiki markup. Until then, please take this unformatted proclamation of my victory over your userboxes. Ha ha, ha ha ha, ha. AtlasZeth ( talk) 12:00, 30 July 2011 (UTC) reply

Notability

Hello, 2birds1stone, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

As for your question to User:Ron Ritzman, please read Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. That page explains what references are considered good enough for establishing notability. YouTube, Facebook and other self-published works generally aren't. — Yerpo Eh? 08:20, 22 February 2011 (UTC) reply

Thank you for the article, it cleared up a few things, notably (pardon the pun) Wikipedia's usage of the word 'notability'. Just a question, Wikipedia itself mentions the Slender Man in many of its articles... Is Wikipedia a reliable source? 2birds1stone ( talk) 04:18, 23 February 2011 (UTC) reply

Re-reading that...that pun was awful, please disregard it. Does Wikipedia therefore not host articles on urban myths undocumented in the news or academia? 2birds1stone ( talk) 04:31, 23 February 2011 (UTC) reply

Also, in the case of an urban myth propogated throught Facebook, YouTube, and self-published works, wouldn't the widespread existance of the myth (as shown by the number of authors jumping on the Slender Man bandwagon) be evidence of notability enough? 2birds1stone ( talk) 10:47, 23 February 2011 (UTC) reply

Not as such, no. Only reliable sources count (and Wikipedia isn't regarded as one). Many internet memes get coverage by mainstream media when they are popular enough - if and when this happens with the Slender Man, it will be eligible for inclusion. — Yerpo Eh? 18:58, 23 February 2011 (UTC) reply

Back of the card suggestion (Yu Gi Oh!)

Hi. I suggest to change the profile picture into the back of the card like Magic: The Gathering and Pokémon Trading Card Game's respective articles. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.195.107.55 ( talk) 13:56, 3 March 2021 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I should learn wiki markup. Until then, please take this unformatted proclamation of my victory over your userboxes. Ha ha, ha ha ha, ha. AtlasZeth ( talk) 12:00, 30 July 2011 (UTC) reply

Notability

Hello, 2birds1stone, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

As for your question to User:Ron Ritzman, please read Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. That page explains what references are considered good enough for establishing notability. YouTube, Facebook and other self-published works generally aren't. — Yerpo Eh? 08:20, 22 February 2011 (UTC) reply

Thank you for the article, it cleared up a few things, notably (pardon the pun) Wikipedia's usage of the word 'notability'. Just a question, Wikipedia itself mentions the Slender Man in many of its articles... Is Wikipedia a reliable source? 2birds1stone ( talk) 04:18, 23 February 2011 (UTC) reply

Re-reading that...that pun was awful, please disregard it. Does Wikipedia therefore not host articles on urban myths undocumented in the news or academia? 2birds1stone ( talk) 04:31, 23 February 2011 (UTC) reply

Also, in the case of an urban myth propogated throught Facebook, YouTube, and self-published works, wouldn't the widespread existance of the myth (as shown by the number of authors jumping on the Slender Man bandwagon) be evidence of notability enough? 2birds1stone ( talk) 10:47, 23 February 2011 (UTC) reply

Not as such, no. Only reliable sources count (and Wikipedia isn't regarded as one). Many internet memes get coverage by mainstream media when they are popular enough - if and when this happens with the Slender Man, it will be eligible for inclusion. — Yerpo Eh? 18:58, 23 February 2011 (UTC) reply

Back of the card suggestion (Yu Gi Oh!)

Hi. I suggest to change the profile picture into the back of the card like Magic: The Gathering and Pokémon Trading Card Game's respective articles. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.195.107.55 ( talk) 13:56, 3 March 2021 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook