The article 295th Ordnance Heavy Maintenance Company (FA) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Safiel (
talk) 00:29, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
I have nominated 295th Ordnance Heavy Maintenance Company (FA), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/295th Ordnance Heavy Maintenance Company (FA). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. — Jeff G. ツ 15:12, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, 295th, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Nick-D (
talk) 08:44, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi there, 295th. I just wanted to drop you a more detailed note on why your article has been nominated for deletion. Wikipedia has a number of guidelines concerning how notable something (a military unit, a person, software, a car etc) has to be to have an article on wikipedia. The key is for there to be significant reliable sources that mention the subject of the article in significant detail, and not just in passing - ie national newspapers, but more usually books or other reliable sources that haven't been self-published, such as on lulu.com or by a vanity press. I'm sorry to say that, despite being an airborne enthusiast on here and writing a number of airborne-related articles, a search online and through my sources shows that the 295th was not notable enough to warrant an article.
Please don't take this as any criticism of yourself or the unit itself, it is simply the rules of wikipedia; for military history-related articles, general notability has found to exist autonmatically at battalion level or above, and often not even then. Smaller units, even combat ones, don't meet notability guidelines as there aren't enough sources that specifically mention them - the odd exception proves the rule really, like Easy Company, 506th Infantry Regiment, the infamous 'Band of Brothers' which has received significant attention in the press and in reliable sources such as books. I'd like to apologize again that your introduction to wikipedia was in such a way, and hope that you will continue to contribute. Please let me know on my talkpage if you have any questions. Skinny87 ( talk) 09:19, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
The article 295th Ordnance Heavy Maintenance Company (FA) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Safiel (
talk) 00:29, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
I have nominated 295th Ordnance Heavy Maintenance Company (FA), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/295th Ordnance Heavy Maintenance Company (FA). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. — Jeff G. ツ 15:12, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, 295th, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Nick-D (
talk) 08:44, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi there, 295th. I just wanted to drop you a more detailed note on why your article has been nominated for deletion. Wikipedia has a number of guidelines concerning how notable something (a military unit, a person, software, a car etc) has to be to have an article on wikipedia. The key is for there to be significant reliable sources that mention the subject of the article in significant detail, and not just in passing - ie national newspapers, but more usually books or other reliable sources that haven't been self-published, such as on lulu.com or by a vanity press. I'm sorry to say that, despite being an airborne enthusiast on here and writing a number of airborne-related articles, a search online and through my sources shows that the 295th was not notable enough to warrant an article.
Please don't take this as any criticism of yourself or the unit itself, it is simply the rules of wikipedia; for military history-related articles, general notability has found to exist autonmatically at battalion level or above, and often not even then. Smaller units, even combat ones, don't meet notability guidelines as there aren't enough sources that specifically mention them - the odd exception proves the rule really, like Easy Company, 506th Infantry Regiment, the infamous 'Band of Brothers' which has received significant attention in the press and in reliable sources such as books. I'd like to apologize again that your introduction to wikipedia was in such a way, and hope that you will continue to contribute. Please let me know on my talkpage if you have any questions. Skinny87 ( talk) 09:19, 21 June 2010 (UTC)