I've reverted your changes. Please read WP:NPOV and WP:BRD. The first describes how we must use a neutral point of view, the second describes the mechanisms we must follow in achieving consensus when a change is made and reverted. Regards, Tarl N. ( discuss) 19:02, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
The article was TERRIBLY non-neutral. I've provided nothing but massive amounts of referenced information that contradicts the extraordinarily NFL-friendly perspectives previously contained. Please specify PRECISELY, the section(s) of text which are any more "NPOV" than those already contained and promulgated by the prior version. 216.240.6.210 ( talk) 19:58, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Did you have trouble with understanding what "Please specify PRECISELY, the section(s) of text which are any more "NPOV" than those already contained and promulgated by the prior version" means?
Though I imagine that actually going to the effort of providing any kind of directly-refutable specificity on something that you're mostly just desperate to avoid allowing at any cost would be somewhat awkward...
I mean, if you *actually* were okay with the INFORMATION being brought forward and were *actually* only opposed to the WAY that it was presented, then obviously you'd be supportively suggesting (or even performing) edits that continued to supply the relevant information, but in a way more conducive to your purported objectives; instead though, in lieue of seeking an erudite, intellectual improvement of the objectioned presentation, you went directly, STRAIGHT to outright censorship and obliteration; a demonstrably intellectually-bankrupt action that puts the purported altruism of your claimed, objective into significant doubt... 216.240.6.210 ( talk) 19:03, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
Robert McClenon (
talk)
03:47, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
331dot (
talk)
10:51, 22 October 2018 (UTC)216.240.6.210 ( talk) 03:46, 25 November 2020 (UTC) Oh noes! I wuz blocked "for 48 hours" for " making personal attacks towards other editors"?! ...and then it only took TWENTY-FIVE-MONTHS for me to even discover this immeasurably and asininely feckless action? SO SAD!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
BTW: Given the title of this page, you have to be aware that I'm posting from an IP Address, and not an account right? ...and given that I not only have access to TOR and several global VPN services, and that there are literally BILLIONS of IPv4 addresses, can you even conceptualize just how entirely impotent and meaninglessly STUPID this eternally-useless action both was and will forever be? 🤔😳😂
I mean, if I'd actually given a crap and/or really wanted to punish you, I could have kept you witlessly blocking addresses for MONTHS, all while laughing my ass off and continuing to post whatever the eff I wanted! All you actually accomplished there was a full-on demonstration of just how unbelievably and infinitely impotent you were/are! 😁😉🤣👍
Thanks for the laughs though, Apparatchik! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Please do not
attack other editors, as you did at
London, Ontario. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please
stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.
freshacconci
(✉)
16:25, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
🤣🤣🤣🤣 🖕 216.240.6.210 ( talk) 23:02, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
I've reverted your changes. Please read WP:NPOV and WP:BRD. The first describes how we must use a neutral point of view, the second describes the mechanisms we must follow in achieving consensus when a change is made and reverted. Regards, Tarl N. ( discuss) 19:02, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
The article was TERRIBLY non-neutral. I've provided nothing but massive amounts of referenced information that contradicts the extraordinarily NFL-friendly perspectives previously contained. Please specify PRECISELY, the section(s) of text which are any more "NPOV" than those already contained and promulgated by the prior version. 216.240.6.210 ( talk) 19:58, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Did you have trouble with understanding what "Please specify PRECISELY, the section(s) of text which are any more "NPOV" than those already contained and promulgated by the prior version" means?
Though I imagine that actually going to the effort of providing any kind of directly-refutable specificity on something that you're mostly just desperate to avoid allowing at any cost would be somewhat awkward...
I mean, if you *actually* were okay with the INFORMATION being brought forward and were *actually* only opposed to the WAY that it was presented, then obviously you'd be supportively suggesting (or even performing) edits that continued to supply the relevant information, but in a way more conducive to your purported objectives; instead though, in lieue of seeking an erudite, intellectual improvement of the objectioned presentation, you went directly, STRAIGHT to outright censorship and obliteration; a demonstrably intellectually-bankrupt action that puts the purported altruism of your claimed, objective into significant doubt... 216.240.6.210 ( talk) 19:03, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
Robert McClenon (
talk)
03:47, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
331dot (
talk)
10:51, 22 October 2018 (UTC)216.240.6.210 ( talk) 03:46, 25 November 2020 (UTC) Oh noes! I wuz blocked "for 48 hours" for " making personal attacks towards other editors"?! ...and then it only took TWENTY-FIVE-MONTHS for me to even discover this immeasurably and asininely feckless action? SO SAD!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
BTW: Given the title of this page, you have to be aware that I'm posting from an IP Address, and not an account right? ...and given that I not only have access to TOR and several global VPN services, and that there are literally BILLIONS of IPv4 addresses, can you even conceptualize just how entirely impotent and meaninglessly STUPID this eternally-useless action both was and will forever be? 🤔😳😂
I mean, if I'd actually given a crap and/or really wanted to punish you, I could have kept you witlessly blocking addresses for MONTHS, all while laughing my ass off and continuing to post whatever the eff I wanted! All you actually accomplished there was a full-on demonstration of just how unbelievably and infinitely impotent you were/are! 😁😉🤣👍
Thanks for the laughs though, Apparatchik! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Please do not
attack other editors, as you did at
London, Ontario. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please
stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.
freshacconci
(✉)
16:25, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
🤣🤣🤣🤣 🖕 216.240.6.210 ( talk) 23:02, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |