Materialscientist has blocked me for archiving a talk page. Others reverted my archiving so I stopped. My archiving was in accordance with wikipedia policy. I had already stopped after the reverts when the block was placed, without warning or an opportunity to discuss. This is systematic abuse. I was not edit warring or being disruptive. I was archiving a talk page in accordance with wikipedia policy. I had just posted 16 suggested changes to the article. My unblock request has been declined. If anyone wants to discuss the 16 suggested changes, I would be happy to do so here, due to the block. 210.6.209.89 ( talk) 17:44, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
I see that you have been blocked for a week, but in response to your question: You were bold and archived some of the talk page messages, you were reverted by several editors. As per WP:BRD the next step is discussion, where you discuss the changes you have attempted to implement until there is a general consensus. Hopefully during the week banning you can take some time to get a better understanding of Wikipedia processes. If you have any questions after you come back you know where to find me. Greyjoy talk 16:03, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
In the meantime, the talk page has a question to you about WP:COI. You can use the waiting time to answer that on this talk page. It's OK to have a conflict of interest, but if you have one, the expectation is less editing in the areas of COI and more talk page discussion to gain consensus for proposed changes.
It would be worse if an administrator who was involved in the discussion blocked you. That would constitute an abuse of the administrator's tools. Administrators should never use their tools against an editor with whom they are in a dispute. An administrator's job is to preserve the stability of the project, so if an administrator perceives disruptive behavior, then tools can be employed to prevent the disruption, such as blocking users or protecting articles. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 16:46, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Hold on, Mr. Vernon and Anachronist are disagreeing whether I need to place a COI template on my page or not. If it is policy that I have to place a template on my page, please quote the policy and show me which template. 210.6.209.89 ( talk) 17:14, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
I have posted 16 edit requests on the young blood transfusion talk page. In the middle of discussion, I was banned by Materialscientist for 1 week. I was archiving old discussions on the talk page in accordance with wikipedia's policies. If anyone wants to discuss the 16 edit requests, I would be happy to do so here, as I cannot currently edit the talk page. 210.6.209.89 ( talk) 16:49, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
210.6.209.89 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I edited the young blood transfusions page, and my edits were reverted. Then I was blocked for 1 day. I posted 16 edit requests to the talk page. Since the talk page was greater than 75k bytes, I began archiving the discussions. In the middle of a discussion on the talk page, Materialscientist blocked me. I am requesting to be unblocked so that I may discuss my proposed edits on the talk page. I also think blocking should be clarified, as I did not expect to be blocked for archiving old discussions on a talk page. Perhaps you should provide guidance on how to discuss archiving and other article changes so as to avoid sudden and unexpected blocks which are noncompliant with wikipedia policies.
Decline reason:
The block was made to end your disruption, not to punish you. This is completely consistent with policy. This request does not address your legal threats; pointing out something is illegal was clearly intended to have a chilling effect on other editors. You also don't address your edit warring. If I were you I wouldn't worry about archiving whatsoever. I don't see any benefit to Wikipedia in removing the block early, as as such I am declining your request. 331dot ( talk) 17:30, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at User talk:210.6.209.89, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Saying "fuck you" to another editor. Mr. Vernon ( talk) 18:15, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Mr. Vernon ( talk) 19:15, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
If you make an unblock appeal via UTRS, please avoid personal attacks. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 20:30, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
Materialscientist has blocked me for archiving a talk page. Others reverted my archiving so I stopped. My archiving was in accordance with wikipedia policy. I had already stopped after the reverts when the block was placed, without warning or an opportunity to discuss. This is systematic abuse. I was not edit warring or being disruptive. I was archiving a talk page in accordance with wikipedia policy. I had just posted 16 suggested changes to the article. My unblock request has been declined. If anyone wants to discuss the 16 suggested changes, I would be happy to do so here, due to the block. 210.6.209.89 ( talk) 17:44, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
I see that you have been blocked for a week, but in response to your question: You were bold and archived some of the talk page messages, you were reverted by several editors. As per WP:BRD the next step is discussion, where you discuss the changes you have attempted to implement until there is a general consensus. Hopefully during the week banning you can take some time to get a better understanding of Wikipedia processes. If you have any questions after you come back you know where to find me. Greyjoy talk 16:03, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
In the meantime, the talk page has a question to you about WP:COI. You can use the waiting time to answer that on this talk page. It's OK to have a conflict of interest, but if you have one, the expectation is less editing in the areas of COI and more talk page discussion to gain consensus for proposed changes.
It would be worse if an administrator who was involved in the discussion blocked you. That would constitute an abuse of the administrator's tools. Administrators should never use their tools against an editor with whom they are in a dispute. An administrator's job is to preserve the stability of the project, so if an administrator perceives disruptive behavior, then tools can be employed to prevent the disruption, such as blocking users or protecting articles. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 16:46, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Hold on, Mr. Vernon and Anachronist are disagreeing whether I need to place a COI template on my page or not. If it is policy that I have to place a template on my page, please quote the policy and show me which template. 210.6.209.89 ( talk) 17:14, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
I have posted 16 edit requests on the young blood transfusion talk page. In the middle of discussion, I was banned by Materialscientist for 1 week. I was archiving old discussions on the talk page in accordance with wikipedia's policies. If anyone wants to discuss the 16 edit requests, I would be happy to do so here, as I cannot currently edit the talk page. 210.6.209.89 ( talk) 16:49, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
210.6.209.89 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I edited the young blood transfusions page, and my edits were reverted. Then I was blocked for 1 day. I posted 16 edit requests to the talk page. Since the talk page was greater than 75k bytes, I began archiving the discussions. In the middle of a discussion on the talk page, Materialscientist blocked me. I am requesting to be unblocked so that I may discuss my proposed edits on the talk page. I also think blocking should be clarified, as I did not expect to be blocked for archiving old discussions on a talk page. Perhaps you should provide guidance on how to discuss archiving and other article changes so as to avoid sudden and unexpected blocks which are noncompliant with wikipedia policies.
Decline reason:
The block was made to end your disruption, not to punish you. This is completely consistent with policy. This request does not address your legal threats; pointing out something is illegal was clearly intended to have a chilling effect on other editors. You also don't address your edit warring. If I were you I wouldn't worry about archiving whatsoever. I don't see any benefit to Wikipedia in removing the block early, as as such I am declining your request. 331dot ( talk) 17:30, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at User talk:210.6.209.89, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Saying "fuck you" to another editor. Mr. Vernon ( talk) 18:15, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Mr. Vernon ( talk) 19:15, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
If you make an unblock appeal via UTRS, please avoid personal attacks. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 20:30, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |