Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   Drmies ( talk) 23:47, 21 October 2019 (UTC) reply

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

183.96.203.13 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))

---

Request reason:

I'm not a sock. Please check my IP address. You will see that i'm not. 183.96.203.13 ( talk) 23:48, 21 October 2019 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

Ah ha. Yamla ( talk) 00:08, 22 October 2019 (UTC) reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Dude. Obvious socks are obvious. Drmies ( talk) 23:52, 21 October 2019 (UTC) reply
  • @ Drmies, so how would I go about getting unblocked? 183.96.203.13 ( talk) 23:58, 21 October 2019 (UTC) reply
    • WP:OFFER. Drmies ( talk) 00:00, 22 October 2019 (UTC) reply
• Yamla, not just a troll. See User talk:KoreanBill. Drmies ( talk) 00:09, 22 October 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Still, for a banned user like this, six months with zero edits is the absolute minimum starting point. Then, they'd need to appeal to the community (see WP:CBAN). No administrator has the right to lift a ban when the user has been this abusive. -- Yamla ( talk) 00:11, 22 October 2019 (UTC) reply
    • @ Yamla & @ Drmies, so if I didn't edit on wikipedia for 6 months and put in an unblock review, would it be on my original accounts talk page, as i'm unsure as to what the password is there. 183.96.203.13 ( talk) 00:14, 22 October 2019 (UTC) reply
      • Yes, that's where it should go. If you no longer have access to that account, sign in to the oldest account you have, note that you no longer have access to the original sockmaster, and make your request there. Follow the instructions in WP:CBAN as you are banned, not blocked. You need the consensus of the community to lift the ban. Note that this is zero edits. Not zero edits with an account. Not zero edits from your current IP address. Zero edits for six months. Note also that your disruption and evasion has gone on for years, so you will have an incredibly high bar to reach. -- Yamla ( talk) 00:16, 22 October 2019 (UTC) reply
      • You figure it out. You're actively socking while we're talking, so I'm going to make some coffee and check the dessert situation, and you can go pipe your sorrows in an ivy leaf, for all I care. Drmies ( talk) 00:19, 22 October 2019 (UTC) reply
      • @ Yamla & @ Drmies Correct, it's been nearly 10 years. But during those 10 years I have learnt a lot about wikipedia policies: sourcing content, uploading images legally etc, so the reasons for my original block: image violations I fortunately no longer do. So the community decides on whether I get unbanned or not, but what about if my edits haven't been bad, incorrect etc as if you look at the sock puppet investigations: /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Marquis_de_la_Eirron/Archive#30_August_2010 nearly all of my accounts in recent years weren't blocked for unsourced material, or spurious allegations on pages etc they were blocked for being that of a sock puppet. Being banned does that mean I technically can't edit for the rest of my life, even though there are articles that need updating, and I'm the only editor who has any interest in that page? 183.96.203.13 ( talk) 00:29, 22 October 2019 (UTC) reply
        • ENOUGH. We've answered your questions. GO AWAY FOR AT LEAST SIX MONTHS. At that point, and not before, you'll need to address your almost ten years of abuse, including outright lying, right here on this page. You aren't welcome here, you've worked extremely hard to demonstrate clearly with your actions that you shouldn't be here. WP:SO is your only chance, and frankly, given your behaviour, it's a slim chance. And that chance drops to exactly zero if you make ludicrous claims like you have, above, that your edits weren't bad. But banned users have been able to convince the community before. But enough. We don't want to hear anything more from you. You know your path forward. Follow it. And stay away from en.wiki for at least six months, starting right now. -- Yamla ( talk) 00:38, 22 October 2019 (UTC) reply

Hey Yamla, check this out: User_talk:81.110.220.68#Please_I_haven't_done_anything_wrong. Hey "Marquis", since you've been doing the same thing for a decade, and now you're doing it through some Korean IP in order to evade scrutiny, I'm sure you understand I'm not impressed with your claims here. Thanks for the offer of updating, but I think we got it covered. Surely all those ancient articles that you and User:KoreanBill edited don't need much updating. Drmies ( talk) 02:24, 22 October 2019 (UTC) reply

@ Drmies, they do need updating as I don't see you updating them. Plus you're showing a message from 8 years ago, a message which actually in the end showed me being right as Sajjad Karim wasn't the first Muslim elected and the other editor was wrong. Also the guy who got me blocked from my first account in the first place, Simple Bob ^{a.k.a. The Spaminator}, /info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/Simple_Bob, was later blocked as a sockpuppet himself, but of course it doesn't matter... 183.96.203.13 ( talk) 10:10, 23 October 2019 (UTC) reply

Six month timer reset. You are now not eligible to apply under WP:SO until 2020-04-23. Talk page access revoked, as you aren't getting the point. -- Yamla ( talk) 11:17, 23 October 2019 (UTC) reply

"Updating"? I have no idea what you're talking about, "Marquis". Haha, that SPI was in 2010--I can't even remember what I had for lunch yesterday. You're wasting your talents. Thanks Yamla. Drmies ( talk) 16:20, 23 October 2019 (UTC) reply