Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources.
You need to stop adding the Allmusic source back to the Animals (Pink Floyd album) article. It does not support the "space rock" genre you insist on adding. Furthermore, the onus is not on me to find you a source. I do not agree with your assessment that the album is "space rock", so therefore, I am not going to make the effort to prove otherwise. Have you considered the possibility that there are no sources out there to support your claim that the album is "space rock" because no one shares your opinion? This is your last chance to stop, after which I will report you to the admins. Y2Kcrazyjoker4 ( talk • contributions) 15:44, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
@ Y2kcrazyjoker4: This is an Iloveartrock sock, see Wikipedia:Requests for page protection#Animals and Atom Heart Mother -- Ilovetopaint ( talk) 19:11, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:39, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
 | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources.
You need to stop adding the Allmusic source back to the Animals (Pink Floyd album) article. It does not support the "space rock" genre you insist on adding. Furthermore, the onus is not on me to find you a source. I do not agree with your assessment that the album is "space rock", so therefore, I am not going to make the effort to prove otherwise. Have you considered the possibility that there are no sources out there to support your claim that the album is "space rock" because no one shares your opinion? This is your last chance to stop, after which I will report you to the admins. Y2Kcrazyjoker4 ( talk • contributions) 15:44, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
@ Y2kcrazyjoker4: This is an Iloveartrock sock, see Wikipedia:Requests for page protection#Animals and Atom Heart Mother -- Ilovetopaint ( talk) 19:11, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:39, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
|
| This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |