I understand you are trying to be helpful, but please stop editing that nomination page. You have now struck out my comments, as well as erased my comments. If you do not stop doing this, I will request that you be blocked.
Steel1943 (
talk)
18:36, 27 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Steel, I'm just checking all upcoming films. I don't think that your block request will be accepted, and some of the nominations in the section are my ones.
176.88.82.7 (
talk)
18:40, 27 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Well, you have now violated the hell out of
WP:TPO, majorly failed to to
WP:BEFORE as you didn't check neither for the validity of the "upcoming" status of the targets nor bypassed any incoming links prior to nominating the redirects, haven't tagged ANY of the redirects you nominated, and have f'ed up my nomination by all of this. Again, I know you are trying to be helpful, but back off. I now have to validate all of your nominations by using Twinkle to tag them, make sure the section redirects are included, and the redirects' creators are notified.
Steel1943 (
talk)
18:44, 27 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Part of the problem is that you are rapidly nominating multiple redirects at a time. Another part of the problem is that you are editing other's comments. A third part of the problem is that the nominations that you are proposing is not following all of the steps at
WP:RFDHOWTO. Editors who created the redirects need to be informed that their redirects are up for deletion and the redirects themselves need to be edited to say that they are up for deletion. --
Super Goku V (
talk)
19:36, 27 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Since it seems like you have stopped, let me suggest that for the future, you make a list of redirects that need to be discussed and then bring it up at
Wikipedia talk:Redirects for discussion to see if someone wants to make the appropriate discussions. If someone suggests an idea, then follow their suggestion instead of mine. --
Super Goku V (
talk)
19:46, 27 February 2023 (UTC)reply
I have multiple questions. 1: What will happen if a discussion was closed by a user who is now blocked? 2: If a sysop or discussion closer is a cock of another user, what will be happened?
176.88.82.7 (
talk)
19:49, 27 February 2023 (UTC)reply
For the first point, it would say closed unless there was an issue with the closing. For the second point, could you rephrase the question? The meaning isn't clear. --
Super Goku V (
talk)
20:02, 27 February 2023 (UTC)reply
For cock, I used C instead of S to not confuse socks and cocks. The same also happened to sockpuppet and cock puppet, where they are one of them. 1. Sock is a cloth worn on feet where cock is short for cock puppet. 2. Sockpuppet is a puppet made from socks where cock puppet is an alternate account of another blocked user.
176.88.82.7 (
talk)
20:11, 27 February 2023 (UTC)reply
(
edit conflict) Please see
WP:RFDHOWTO for the instructions for all steps necessary when nominating a redirect. Either way though, I got those redirects tagged since I want them gone as well, but I really don't want to have to do that again solely due to incomplete nominations by another editor.
Steel1943 (
talk)
18:30, 28 February 2023 (UTC)reply
If I already created an account and that account constructively made 10 edits, then I had to try Twinkle and other Wikipedia programs. Even if so, all Vandalisms and disruptives will be reverted much faster, where a Vandalism is an edit made by a Vandal and Vandal-only account, and disruptives is short for disruptive edits.
176.88.82.7 (
talk)
20:21, 28 February 2023 (UTC)reply
This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address.
I understand you are trying to be helpful, but please stop editing that nomination page. You have now struck out my comments, as well as erased my comments. If you do not stop doing this, I will request that you be blocked.
Steel1943 (
talk)
18:36, 27 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Steel, I'm just checking all upcoming films. I don't think that your block request will be accepted, and some of the nominations in the section are my ones.
176.88.82.7 (
talk)
18:40, 27 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Well, you have now violated the hell out of
WP:TPO, majorly failed to to
WP:BEFORE as you didn't check neither for the validity of the "upcoming" status of the targets nor bypassed any incoming links prior to nominating the redirects, haven't tagged ANY of the redirects you nominated, and have f'ed up my nomination by all of this. Again, I know you are trying to be helpful, but back off. I now have to validate all of your nominations by using Twinkle to tag them, make sure the section redirects are included, and the redirects' creators are notified.
Steel1943 (
talk)
18:44, 27 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Part of the problem is that you are rapidly nominating multiple redirects at a time. Another part of the problem is that you are editing other's comments. A third part of the problem is that the nominations that you are proposing is not following all of the steps at
WP:RFDHOWTO. Editors who created the redirects need to be informed that their redirects are up for deletion and the redirects themselves need to be edited to say that they are up for deletion. --
Super Goku V (
talk)
19:36, 27 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Since it seems like you have stopped, let me suggest that for the future, you make a list of redirects that need to be discussed and then bring it up at
Wikipedia talk:Redirects for discussion to see if someone wants to make the appropriate discussions. If someone suggests an idea, then follow their suggestion instead of mine. --
Super Goku V (
talk)
19:46, 27 February 2023 (UTC)reply
I have multiple questions. 1: What will happen if a discussion was closed by a user who is now blocked? 2: If a sysop or discussion closer is a cock of another user, what will be happened?
176.88.82.7 (
talk)
19:49, 27 February 2023 (UTC)reply
For the first point, it would say closed unless there was an issue with the closing. For the second point, could you rephrase the question? The meaning isn't clear. --
Super Goku V (
talk)
20:02, 27 February 2023 (UTC)reply
For cock, I used C instead of S to not confuse socks and cocks. The same also happened to sockpuppet and cock puppet, where they are one of them. 1. Sock is a cloth worn on feet where cock is short for cock puppet. 2. Sockpuppet is a puppet made from socks where cock puppet is an alternate account of another blocked user.
176.88.82.7 (
talk)
20:11, 27 February 2023 (UTC)reply
(
edit conflict) Please see
WP:RFDHOWTO for the instructions for all steps necessary when nominating a redirect. Either way though, I got those redirects tagged since I want them gone as well, but I really don't want to have to do that again solely due to incomplete nominations by another editor.
Steel1943 (
talk)
18:30, 28 February 2023 (UTC)reply
If I already created an account and that account constructively made 10 edits, then I had to try Twinkle and other Wikipedia programs. Even if so, all Vandalisms and disruptives will be reverted much faster, where a Vandalism is an edit made by a Vandal and Vandal-only account, and disruptives is short for disruptive edits.
176.88.82.7 (
talk)
20:21, 28 February 2023 (UTC)reply
This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address.