What's wrong with the sources I added, or with those for India (other than the "powerhouse" one which was recently removed)? I don't think India's liable to become a superpower, either, but many academics do, so Wikipedia covers them. Oh, and I'm American, not Russian, although a lot of my family is from the former Czechoslovakia. Tezero ( talk) 21:00, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
151.40.45.125 and Tezero, I was reviewing your edits on the Potential Superpowers but really the problem lies with Antiochus the Great [1] and on the Potential Superpowers here [2] and OccultZone is involved but also Antiochus the Great has been known to hide behind multiple ips even though he says he doesn't. The problem started with Russia as a superpower to not a superpower on December 30, 2013 with Antiochus the Great and he did it on the potential superpowers May 2014. These two editors are behind this anti Russia campaign, they hate Russia and so they are put it's academic sources off and discussions off the map. They are pro USA all the way even though Antiochus the Great is British. I have their history of communication with each since April 2013 so I know their track record to verify their anti Russia.
The fact is Russia is a superpower, period. The academic source is Russia in the 21st Century: The Prodigal Superpower Steven Rosefielde, International Relations Professor UC University, 2004 http://www.amazon.com/Russia-21st-Century-Prodigal-Superpower/dp/0521545293
but for Antiochus the Great and OccultZone to say its out of date, oh really but that is absurd but then when it comes to their source on the Superpowers page on the academic source "Lonely Superpower or Unapologetic Hyperpower? Analyzing American Power in the post–Cold War Era", it is outdated, way outdated. You can not have a 1999 source to say the United States is a superpower. If the US is a superpower then it needs current acedemic sources to state it is a superpower. The url is http://post.queensu.ca/~nossalk/papers/hyperpower.htm but for Antiochus the Great and OccultZone they don't want to reply if there is no new update, the only other one is a 2008 source they have, that's it.
I also have over 100 or so Russia superpower articles from 2003 to 2014, so I am not just saying that but I have those sources at hand when I will use them but I have a hard time dealing those the corrupted editors on these pages who are specifically out to denounce Russia.
Also, I am not Russian myself. I was born in Maine, I am full American as their is nothing Russian about me, so my tale is I support the facts not the anti countries some editors are using Wikipedia for. There needs to be some editor elimination on these
Anyway I wanted to forward that info to you guys, thanks-- 192.173.144.237 ( talk) 23:05, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi there. I'm Serge, an Admin here at Wikipedia. You...seem to be making a lot of "melodramatic" comments on talk pages. Can you please tone it down with some of the "propaganda" and "historians are laughing at this" type commentary? Its good to keep discussing things, but comments like this aren't constructive, they just irritate people, rather than working to find a real solution. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 02:50, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
What's wrong with the sources I added, or with those for India (other than the "powerhouse" one which was recently removed)? I don't think India's liable to become a superpower, either, but many academics do, so Wikipedia covers them. Oh, and I'm American, not Russian, although a lot of my family is from the former Czechoslovakia. Tezero ( talk) 21:00, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
151.40.45.125 and Tezero, I was reviewing your edits on the Potential Superpowers but really the problem lies with Antiochus the Great [1] and on the Potential Superpowers here [2] and OccultZone is involved but also Antiochus the Great has been known to hide behind multiple ips even though he says he doesn't. The problem started with Russia as a superpower to not a superpower on December 30, 2013 with Antiochus the Great and he did it on the potential superpowers May 2014. These two editors are behind this anti Russia campaign, they hate Russia and so they are put it's academic sources off and discussions off the map. They are pro USA all the way even though Antiochus the Great is British. I have their history of communication with each since April 2013 so I know their track record to verify their anti Russia.
The fact is Russia is a superpower, period. The academic source is Russia in the 21st Century: The Prodigal Superpower Steven Rosefielde, International Relations Professor UC University, 2004 http://www.amazon.com/Russia-21st-Century-Prodigal-Superpower/dp/0521545293
but for Antiochus the Great and OccultZone to say its out of date, oh really but that is absurd but then when it comes to their source on the Superpowers page on the academic source "Lonely Superpower or Unapologetic Hyperpower? Analyzing American Power in the post–Cold War Era", it is outdated, way outdated. You can not have a 1999 source to say the United States is a superpower. If the US is a superpower then it needs current acedemic sources to state it is a superpower. The url is http://post.queensu.ca/~nossalk/papers/hyperpower.htm but for Antiochus the Great and OccultZone they don't want to reply if there is no new update, the only other one is a 2008 source they have, that's it.
I also have over 100 or so Russia superpower articles from 2003 to 2014, so I am not just saying that but I have those sources at hand when I will use them but I have a hard time dealing those the corrupted editors on these pages who are specifically out to denounce Russia.
Also, I am not Russian myself. I was born in Maine, I am full American as their is nothing Russian about me, so my tale is I support the facts not the anti countries some editors are using Wikipedia for. There needs to be some editor elimination on these
Anyway I wanted to forward that info to you guys, thanks-- 192.173.144.237 ( talk) 23:05, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi there. I'm Serge, an Admin here at Wikipedia. You...seem to be making a lot of "melodramatic" comments on talk pages. Can you please tone it down with some of the "propaganda" and "historians are laughing at this" type commentary? Its good to keep discussing things, but comments like this aren't constructive, they just irritate people, rather than working to find a real solution. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 02:50, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |