Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Funland (Rehoboth Beach, Delaware). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please stop restoring "your version" of this article. There are many problems with it and you need to engage in a discussion on the article talk page. MB 03:41, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Funland (Rehoboth Beach, Delaware) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 01:19, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Funland (Rehoboth Beach, Delaware) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being
blocked from editing—especially if you violate the
three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Back from your edit warring block, and 10 minutes after the article protection ends you restore the content yet again...
Meters (
talk)
23:10, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:108.48.147.41 reported by User:Fehufanga (Result: ). Thank you. -- *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 05:04, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello, 108.48.147.41. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Funland (Rehoboth Beach, Delaware), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. M.Bitton ( talk) 15:53, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Per a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. EdJohnston ( talk) 20:30, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello IP. I have followed the ongoing discussions on Talk:Funland (Rehoboth Beach, Delaware) and am concerned with the language that is being used with editors from this series of edits. I want to urge you to please read WP:CIVILITY, as the discussion is no longer progressing towards a consensus. A lot of what was mentioned in the diff is repeated from previous comments made, and shows not assuming good faith. I am reaching out to you as a final line to please consider other editors more kindly, build consensus based on what they are suggesting, and understand Wikipedia's policies about encyclopedic article writing from the talk page discussion. Adog ( Talk・ Cont) 14:23, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Adog ( Talk・ Cont) 15:14, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Cullen328 ( talk) 16:08, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Because you continue to threaten to disrupt the encyclopedia, I have revoked your talk page access. Cullen328 ( talk) 01:28, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Funland (Rehoboth Beach, Delaware). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please stop restoring "your version" of this article. There are many problems with it and you need to engage in a discussion on the article talk page. MB 03:41, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Funland (Rehoboth Beach, Delaware) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 01:19, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Funland (Rehoboth Beach, Delaware) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being
blocked from editing—especially if you violate the
three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Back from your edit warring block, and 10 minutes after the article protection ends you restore the content yet again...
Meters (
talk)
23:10, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:108.48.147.41 reported by User:Fehufanga (Result: ). Thank you. -- *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 05:04, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello, 108.48.147.41. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Funland (Rehoboth Beach, Delaware), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. M.Bitton ( talk) 15:53, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Per a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. EdJohnston ( talk) 20:30, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello IP. I have followed the ongoing discussions on Talk:Funland (Rehoboth Beach, Delaware) and am concerned with the language that is being used with editors from this series of edits. I want to urge you to please read WP:CIVILITY, as the discussion is no longer progressing towards a consensus. A lot of what was mentioned in the diff is repeated from previous comments made, and shows not assuming good faith. I am reaching out to you as a final line to please consider other editors more kindly, build consensus based on what they are suggesting, and understand Wikipedia's policies about encyclopedic article writing from the talk page discussion. Adog ( Talk・ Cont) 14:23, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Adog ( Talk・ Cont) 15:14, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Cullen328 ( talk) 16:08, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Because you continue to threaten to disrupt the encyclopedia, I have revoked your talk page access. Cullen328 ( talk) 01:28, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |