God...KING & Mr. JOHN ALEXANDER MATSUI, MATSUI-SAN — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.56.40.189 ( talk) 13:30, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
below this line
(below this line)
Please do not undo the move a second time. It isn't productive or helpful for conversations to be started at both the top and the bottom of the page. I moved the discussion of ancestry to its proper location chronologically based on when it started. That is only an inconvenience for those who may have started the conversation and expected it to be at the top of the page, but that's the consequence of starting it in the wrong place, not a reason to keep it there. General Ization Talk 20:08, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
Do you really believe that? I think you are purposely avoiding common sense just to be disruptive. ....SandwitchHawk.... (talk) 05:31, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
I noticed that comment as a response immediately following mine on the talk page. I didn't want to derail the conversation happening there since it had already progressed, but I was a bit confused when I read it. Was that directed at me? I'm just somewhat caught off guard and not sure how I'm being disruptive, when that was the first time I've voiced my thoughts in that discussion.-- Slon02 ( talk) 19:16, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
You are being disruptive and tendentious on Talk:2016 Orlando nightclub shooting. I and other users have patiently explained Wikipedia's policies and guidelines regarding the video. You, in turn, have made personal attacks and cast aspersions. You were invited to discuss policy changes and source reliability at appropriate venues but have instead continued using the article's talk page to try to push the video and make your point. Some other relevant essays are WP:TRUTH and WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS.
You've made allusions to Gamergate and you are editing on an article that is under discretionary sanctions. Please review the Gamergate discretionary sanctions at WP:ARBGG and the Afghanistan-related discretionary sanctions at WP:ARBIPA.
Please stop your disruptive and inappropriate behaviors. If you continue being disruptive, insulting users, or casting aspersions, you may be blocked from editing. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{ re}} 00:20, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Of course you probably don't actually care about factual information", accusing others of pretending to be ignorant, and this whole comment: "
Ok but why do you think I am personally attacking you? Do you feel attacked? Are you perhaps being overtly sensitive? Sorry, but this is how I speak with adults. Are you a child perhaps? I'm not really mature myself, but I'm just trying to find the reason why you feel attacked. Are you ok?". Also POV pushing. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{ re}} 00:30, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
"Of course you probably don't actually care about factual information"
This is a valid concern I have, I am wondering if you may or may not care about factual information. That's all. This is a reasonable concern, given the situation, and is not a personal attack against you.
And yes, please explain what is "POV pushing" how do you think I am doing this? How is this not an insult given the clear sources I have provided? ....SandwitchHawk.... ( talk) 00:58, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Please be careful about that. In Talk:2016 Orlando nightclub shooting#New evidence, there is a clear warning at the top of the closed-discussion template that states: "The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion." I've moved your post out of the template and put it underneath said template where it should be. I don't know what happened, but your signature indicates that post was made two minutes after the discussion was closed.
Just a heads-up. Parsley Man ( talk) 00:31, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Morrowind native.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 11:05, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Before you make simplistic accusations of littering articles with {{cn}} tags perhaps you should look at my record and realise that I have cleared up more of those tags than I have issued. And they do not "litter" an article, they show where a claim is made that really needs some support. Any absolute word such as "only" or "unique" or even "never" must have some supporting documentation because just one contrary example renders the claim meaningless. Dabbler ( talk) 00:15, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
This edit was made because I was reverting an editor who was evading their block. If that's correct, I don't object you changing it, it was done more because that editor was making a lot of other bad edits, and was already blocked at the time of making that one. Sergecross73 msg me 03:38, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Note to Admin: This editor expresses all the same traits as the main account. Andiar.rohnds (and his prior socks Crystal.seed and MollecularManipulator) If you compare their talk page, you'll see the similarities.
Contact me if you have any questions. I can go into more detail if them an Admin looking into this actually has any doubts on this. Sergecross73 msg me 13:05, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello, ....SandwitchHawk..... Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
God...KING & Mr. JOHN ALEXANDER MATSUI, MATSUI-SAN — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.56.40.189 ( talk) 13:30, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
below this line
(below this line)
Please do not undo the move a second time. It isn't productive or helpful for conversations to be started at both the top and the bottom of the page. I moved the discussion of ancestry to its proper location chronologically based on when it started. That is only an inconvenience for those who may have started the conversation and expected it to be at the top of the page, but that's the consequence of starting it in the wrong place, not a reason to keep it there. General Ization Talk 20:08, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
Do you really believe that? I think you are purposely avoiding common sense just to be disruptive. ....SandwitchHawk.... (talk) 05:31, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
I noticed that comment as a response immediately following mine on the talk page. I didn't want to derail the conversation happening there since it had already progressed, but I was a bit confused when I read it. Was that directed at me? I'm just somewhat caught off guard and not sure how I'm being disruptive, when that was the first time I've voiced my thoughts in that discussion.-- Slon02 ( talk) 19:16, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
You are being disruptive and tendentious on Talk:2016 Orlando nightclub shooting. I and other users have patiently explained Wikipedia's policies and guidelines regarding the video. You, in turn, have made personal attacks and cast aspersions. You were invited to discuss policy changes and source reliability at appropriate venues but have instead continued using the article's talk page to try to push the video and make your point. Some other relevant essays are WP:TRUTH and WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS.
You've made allusions to Gamergate and you are editing on an article that is under discretionary sanctions. Please review the Gamergate discretionary sanctions at WP:ARBGG and the Afghanistan-related discretionary sanctions at WP:ARBIPA.
Please stop your disruptive and inappropriate behaviors. If you continue being disruptive, insulting users, or casting aspersions, you may be blocked from editing. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{ re}} 00:20, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Of course you probably don't actually care about factual information", accusing others of pretending to be ignorant, and this whole comment: "
Ok but why do you think I am personally attacking you? Do you feel attacked? Are you perhaps being overtly sensitive? Sorry, but this is how I speak with adults. Are you a child perhaps? I'm not really mature myself, but I'm just trying to find the reason why you feel attacked. Are you ok?". Also POV pushing. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{ re}} 00:30, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
"Of course you probably don't actually care about factual information"
This is a valid concern I have, I am wondering if you may or may not care about factual information. That's all. This is a reasonable concern, given the situation, and is not a personal attack against you.
And yes, please explain what is "POV pushing" how do you think I am doing this? How is this not an insult given the clear sources I have provided? ....SandwitchHawk.... ( talk) 00:58, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Please be careful about that. In Talk:2016 Orlando nightclub shooting#New evidence, there is a clear warning at the top of the closed-discussion template that states: "The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion." I've moved your post out of the template and put it underneath said template where it should be. I don't know what happened, but your signature indicates that post was made two minutes after the discussion was closed.
Just a heads-up. Parsley Man ( talk) 00:31, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Morrowind native.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 11:05, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Before you make simplistic accusations of littering articles with {{cn}} tags perhaps you should look at my record and realise that I have cleared up more of those tags than I have issued. And they do not "litter" an article, they show where a claim is made that really needs some support. Any absolute word such as "only" or "unique" or even "never" must have some supporting documentation because just one contrary example renders the claim meaningless. Dabbler ( talk) 00:15, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
This edit was made because I was reverting an editor who was evading their block. If that's correct, I don't object you changing it, it was done more because that editor was making a lot of other bad edits, and was already blocked at the time of making that one. Sergecross73 msg me 03:38, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Note to Admin: This editor expresses all the same traits as the main account. Andiar.rohnds (and his prior socks Crystal.seed and MollecularManipulator) If you compare their talk page, you'll see the similarities.
Contact me if you have any questions. I can go into more detail if them an Admin looking into this actually has any doubts on this. Sergecross73 msg me 13:05, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello, ....SandwitchHawk..... Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)