![]() |
Daily pageviews of User:Роман Сергеевич Сидоров
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Articulatory settings: Hi, Wikipedia prefers it if you don't use people's Talk pages for individual discussions. I suggest you first read the Wikipedia article Basis of articulation, which covers articulatory settings. Then you might like to visit the item in my Blog from March 2016 (you can find the blog at www.peterroach.net and the list of archived blog posts is printed on the right side of the screen). You will see that you can leave comments at the end of that blog post, as several people have done. That would be a good place to ask questions or make comments. Best wishes, RoachPeter ( talk) 09:25, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
It is a good idea to study phonetics. But editing Wikipedia is not something for beginners. The people who edit the phonetics articles in Wikipedia are mostly people like me who have worked in the subject for many years and have a lot of experience. But there are many other things you could plan to do when you have completed your study of phonetics: write teaching material to help language learners with their pronunciation, or analyze and describe different languages or dialects. My 'English Phonetics and Phonology' is for beginners, and I have also written a small introductory textbook called 'Phonetics' for Oxford University Press. Reading spectrograms is a special area of phonetics, and many people find it very difficult. I do not know of a book which can teach you everything about it, but Peter Ladefoged's book 'A Course in Phonetics', Chapter 8, is a good introduction. You would also need to learn how to make spectrograms on your computer. RoachPeter ( talk) 10:44, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
It appears that you have been
canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While
friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a
neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are
indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain
point of view or side of a debate, or which are
selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of
consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you.
Nardog (
talk)
11:27, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
You must stop using Wikipedia as a way of contacting individual people with your personal issues. You should use email or Messenger if you want to make personal contacts. I will not reply to any future message from you.
I have already explained that learning acoustic phonetics and using computers for acoustic analysis is useful but very difficult. I would say it is impossible unless you follow a course on the subject with a competent teacher.
You are using the wrong English words for your questions. "Self-control" means something completely different from what you are talking about. The subject to look for is "feedback". If you use Google to search for information about visual feedback in pronunciation learning and teaching you will find links to sites such as this one: https://core.ac.uk/display/85390718 RoachPeter ( talk) 09:34, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate that you enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an
encyclopedia and not a
social network. Wikipedia is not a place to socialize or write things that are not directly related to improving the encyclopedia, as you did at
User talk:Wolfdog. Off-topic material may be deleted at any time. We're sorry if this message has discouraged you from editing here, but the ultimate goal of this website is to build an encyclopedia. For questions not related to improving the encyclopedia, visit
Wikipedia:Reference desk.
Nardog (
talk)
12:33, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
discussion means debateNot necessarily. The way I used it is synonymous with "description" or "explanation". The next time you encounter an English word and you are not sure what it means in the context, I suggest you look it up either in a bilingual (i.e. English–Russian) dictionary of your choice or in a monolingual dictionary targeted for learners of English such as the Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary [1] or the Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English [2].
I would be interested to know when you gained your IPA Certificate of Proficiency in the Phonetics of English and your Bachelor's degree in Phonetics, as displayed on your home page. RoachPeter ( talk) 20:29, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello. I am sorry, but I do not have any specific knowledge of medicine. If you check the page history of Levofloxacin, you can see that my only contribution is this one, i.e. the addition of a missing space. Please, use Talk:Levofloxacin if you are not sure about which trade names to add. -- Aldiviva ( talk) 16:41, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Mikhail Nikolaevich Artemenkov, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Reading Beans ( talk) 11:38, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Since November, your user page appears to have evolved into a form which has begun to breach our WP:USERPAGE guidance, as it now resembles a Wikipedia article. To avoid any risk of it being deleted per WP:FAKEARTICLE, please remove the article-style formatting and all use of the third person in the first section. We do not need you to share information which is irrelevant to the purposes or needs of Wikipedia, such as your height, full birthdate or marital status, nor to present such content in an Infobox that resembles an article. (It is also unwise to make personal details such as birth date publicly visible. I can WP:REVDEL this for you, if you have second thoughts about making this public. Other information about you which is relevant to your editing interests is acceptable of course, but it is important that you do not attempt to create a 'Profile' for yourself which which looks like one of our mainspace articles.
Please address this, and I'd then be very happy to review it for you again if you let me know when you've found time to fix things. Many thanks, Nick Moyes ( talk) 19:24, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
"I'm not an active editor of this project, for I don't consider the rules of Wikipedia to be reasonable."I hope you won't think me unreasonable if I were to suggest it would also be worthwhile deleting the other blank subsections until such time as you do actually contribute something about them here. That said, I do see you have created some articles on ru.wikipedia, and you are welcome to use the
{{
illm}}
template to link to them. Otherwise those sections just seem pointless.The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Think Yourself / Think Now until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.// Timothy :: talk 18:06, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kirill Chereshko until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Metropolitan90 (talk) 21:58, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello Роман Сергеевич Сидоров, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Nahal International Short Film Festival, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nahal International Short Film Festival.
Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Remsense}}
. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Remsense 诉 22:11, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
Nahal International Short Film Festival, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 08:21, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
Daily pageviews of User:Роман Сергеевич Сидоров
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Articulatory settings: Hi, Wikipedia prefers it if you don't use people's Talk pages for individual discussions. I suggest you first read the Wikipedia article Basis of articulation, which covers articulatory settings. Then you might like to visit the item in my Blog from March 2016 (you can find the blog at www.peterroach.net and the list of archived blog posts is printed on the right side of the screen). You will see that you can leave comments at the end of that blog post, as several people have done. That would be a good place to ask questions or make comments. Best wishes, RoachPeter ( talk) 09:25, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
It is a good idea to study phonetics. But editing Wikipedia is not something for beginners. The people who edit the phonetics articles in Wikipedia are mostly people like me who have worked in the subject for many years and have a lot of experience. But there are many other things you could plan to do when you have completed your study of phonetics: write teaching material to help language learners with their pronunciation, or analyze and describe different languages or dialects. My 'English Phonetics and Phonology' is for beginners, and I have also written a small introductory textbook called 'Phonetics' for Oxford University Press. Reading spectrograms is a special area of phonetics, and many people find it very difficult. I do not know of a book which can teach you everything about it, but Peter Ladefoged's book 'A Course in Phonetics', Chapter 8, is a good introduction. You would also need to learn how to make spectrograms on your computer. RoachPeter ( talk) 10:44, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
It appears that you have been
canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While
friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a
neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are
indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain
point of view or side of a debate, or which are
selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of
consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you.
Nardog (
talk)
11:27, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
You must stop using Wikipedia as a way of contacting individual people with your personal issues. You should use email or Messenger if you want to make personal contacts. I will not reply to any future message from you.
I have already explained that learning acoustic phonetics and using computers for acoustic analysis is useful but very difficult. I would say it is impossible unless you follow a course on the subject with a competent teacher.
You are using the wrong English words for your questions. "Self-control" means something completely different from what you are talking about. The subject to look for is "feedback". If you use Google to search for information about visual feedback in pronunciation learning and teaching you will find links to sites such as this one: https://core.ac.uk/display/85390718 RoachPeter ( talk) 09:34, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate that you enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an
encyclopedia and not a
social network. Wikipedia is not a place to socialize or write things that are not directly related to improving the encyclopedia, as you did at
User talk:Wolfdog. Off-topic material may be deleted at any time. We're sorry if this message has discouraged you from editing here, but the ultimate goal of this website is to build an encyclopedia. For questions not related to improving the encyclopedia, visit
Wikipedia:Reference desk.
Nardog (
talk)
12:33, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
discussion means debateNot necessarily. The way I used it is synonymous with "description" or "explanation". The next time you encounter an English word and you are not sure what it means in the context, I suggest you look it up either in a bilingual (i.e. English–Russian) dictionary of your choice or in a monolingual dictionary targeted for learners of English such as the Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary [1] or the Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English [2].
I would be interested to know when you gained your IPA Certificate of Proficiency in the Phonetics of English and your Bachelor's degree in Phonetics, as displayed on your home page. RoachPeter ( talk) 20:29, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello. I am sorry, but I do not have any specific knowledge of medicine. If you check the page history of Levofloxacin, you can see that my only contribution is this one, i.e. the addition of a missing space. Please, use Talk:Levofloxacin if you are not sure about which trade names to add. -- Aldiviva ( talk) 16:41, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Mikhail Nikolaevich Artemenkov, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Reading Beans ( talk) 11:38, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Since November, your user page appears to have evolved into a form which has begun to breach our WP:USERPAGE guidance, as it now resembles a Wikipedia article. To avoid any risk of it being deleted per WP:FAKEARTICLE, please remove the article-style formatting and all use of the third person in the first section. We do not need you to share information which is irrelevant to the purposes or needs of Wikipedia, such as your height, full birthdate or marital status, nor to present such content in an Infobox that resembles an article. (It is also unwise to make personal details such as birth date publicly visible. I can WP:REVDEL this for you, if you have second thoughts about making this public. Other information about you which is relevant to your editing interests is acceptable of course, but it is important that you do not attempt to create a 'Profile' for yourself which which looks like one of our mainspace articles.
Please address this, and I'd then be very happy to review it for you again if you let me know when you've found time to fix things. Many thanks, Nick Moyes ( talk) 19:24, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
"I'm not an active editor of this project, for I don't consider the rules of Wikipedia to be reasonable."I hope you won't think me unreasonable if I were to suggest it would also be worthwhile deleting the other blank subsections until such time as you do actually contribute something about them here. That said, I do see you have created some articles on ru.wikipedia, and you are welcome to use the
{{
illm}}
template to link to them. Otherwise those sections just seem pointless.The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Think Yourself / Think Now until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.// Timothy :: talk 18:06, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kirill Chereshko until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Metropolitan90 (talk) 21:58, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello Роман Сергеевич Сидоров, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Nahal International Short Film Festival, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nahal International Short Film Festival.
Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Remsense}}
. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Remsense 诉 22:11, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
Nahal International Short Film Festival, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 08:21, 19 March 2024 (UTC)