Reason: Fails
WP:NACADEMIC and
WP:NRV. There appear to be no
verifiable sources. There's only one Google Scholar result, which references the subject only once with regard to another person attending one of his lectures. Regular Google search also does not uncover any additional
reliable sources. There's no evidence that the subject meets the other criteria for academic notability.
Reason: The only references to the organization found on
Google news are trivial because the organization is only mentioned
in passing, usually in the context of quoting the organization's founder. There appears to be no
significant coverage of the organization.
Reason: Per
WP:CORPDEPTH, there does not appear to be any significant coverage of this organization. All references appear to be trivial (i.e., to their predictions, rather than to coverage of the organization qua organization). (See also
User:NewsAndEventsGuy's
post on the talk page).
Reason: Per
WP:BEFORE search, the only two reviews are the ones cited in the article. Both sources appear to be unreliable because both publications accept sponsored content (
We Rave You and
Cultr). The remaining Google results are routine announcements of the release of the titular track.
Reason: Non-notable
musician and not notable under the notability guideline for
people convicted of a crime. Even if a case for notability could be made, it seems like his notability would be
temporary.
Reason:
Non-notable film. I have not been able to any significant coverage via Google, and
Newspapers.com and NewspaperARCHIVE turned up zero hits on the title.
Reason: Fails
WP:NACADEMIC and
WP:NRV. There appear to be no
verifiable sources. There's only one Google Scholar result, which references the subject only once with regard to another person attending one of his lectures. Regular Google search also does not uncover any additional
reliable sources. There's no evidence that the subject meets the other criteria for academic notability.
Reason: The only references to the organization found on
Google news are trivial because the organization is only mentioned
in passing, usually in the context of quoting the organization's founder. There appears to be no
significant coverage of the organization.
Reason: Per
WP:CORPDEPTH, there does not appear to be any significant coverage of this organization. All references appear to be trivial (i.e., to their predictions, rather than to coverage of the organization qua organization). (See also
User:NewsAndEventsGuy's
post on the talk page).
Reason: Per
WP:BEFORE search, the only two reviews are the ones cited in the article. Both sources appear to be unreliable because both publications accept sponsored content (
We Rave You and
Cultr). The remaining Google results are routine announcements of the release of the titular track.
Reason: Non-notable
musician and not notable under the notability guideline for
people convicted of a crime. Even if a case for notability could be made, it seems like his notability would be
temporary.
Reason:
Non-notable film. I have not been able to any significant coverage via Google, and
Newspapers.com and NewspaperARCHIVE turned up zero hits on the title.