Question about importance
An article Indian rock cut architecture, having inline citations from five different sources on the web, has been tagged unimportant for the following reason:
This looks like original research based on web-only sources. Aren't there any books or academic journals on the subject? If not, how is this important? Ekajati ( yakity-yak) 15:48, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Is this a valid reason for tagging an article as unimportant? Mattisse (talk) 16:06, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- I think this shows signs of actions specifically directed at one user. User:Ekajati and User:Hanuman Das seem to be following User:Mattisse around, tagging articles User:Mattisse has worked on, reverting tags which M has added, and generally trying to stir up problems (see User talk:Aguerriero). This is linked to past tagging by M on articles HD worked on and lots of sockpuppet acusations. It seems to me they are on the wrong side WP:POINT and WP:AGF. -- Salix alba ( talk) 16:37, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- You've got that backwards. It has been Mattisse stalking first Rosencomet, then 999, then Hanuman Das and to some extent myself. She used sockpuppets to stalk Rosencomet and 999, and is probably using Timmy12 now to continue to stalk Rosencomet. How long will the admins let this continue? I've put many of the involved article on my watchlist so can see the patterns. Have you looked? Ekajati ( yakity-yak) 16:49, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- That is a past event which has been resolved with administrator intervention. We are now talking about current events such as [1], [2], removing/moving citation tags on various blues artist. Basically anything Matisse edits seems to have Ekajati quickly doing a dimetrically opposite edit. Comparing contributions for Mattise [3] and Ekajati [4] show remarkable similarity. -- Salix alba ( talk) 17:10, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
I don't believe it is over. Check out these edits by Timmy12:
- edit comment - starts calling removing tags "vandalism" at the same time Mattisse does
- ditto
- adds a "personal file" of an incident involving Mattisse but not Timmy12
- titles notes section "Reference notes" just as Mattisse has been doing on multiple articles she has created.
Ekajati ( yakity-yak) 20:15, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Question about importance
An article Indian rock cut architecture, having inline citations from five different sources on the web, has been tagged unimportant for the following reason:
This looks like original research based on web-only sources. Aren't there any books or academic journals on the subject? If not, how is this important? Ekajati ( yakity-yak) 15:48, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Is this a valid reason for tagging an article as unimportant? Mattisse (talk) 16:06, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- I think this shows signs of actions specifically directed at one user. User:Ekajati and User:Hanuman Das seem to be following User:Mattisse around, tagging articles User:Mattisse has worked on, reverting tags which M has added, and generally trying to stir up problems (see User talk:Aguerriero). This is linked to past tagging by M on articles HD worked on and lots of sockpuppet acusations. It seems to me they are on the wrong side WP:POINT and WP:AGF. -- Salix alba ( talk) 16:37, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- You've got that backwards. It has been Mattisse stalking first Rosencomet, then 999, then Hanuman Das and to some extent myself. She used sockpuppets to stalk Rosencomet and 999, and is probably using Timmy12 now to continue to stalk Rosencomet. How long will the admins let this continue? I've put many of the involved article on my watchlist so can see the patterns. Have you looked? Ekajati ( yakity-yak) 16:49, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- That is a past event which has been resolved with administrator intervention. We are now talking about current events such as [1], [2], removing/moving citation tags on various blues artist. Basically anything Matisse edits seems to have Ekajati quickly doing a dimetrically opposite edit. Comparing contributions for Mattise [3] and Ekajati [4] show remarkable similarity. -- Salix alba ( talk) 17:10, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
I don't believe it is over. Check out these edits by Timmy12:
- edit comment - starts calling removing tags "vandalism" at the same time Mattisse does
- ditto
- adds a "personal file" of an incident involving Mattisse but not Timmy12
- titles notes section "Reference notes" just as Mattisse has been doing on multiple articles she has created.
Ekajati ( yakity-yak) 20:15, 24 October 2006 (UTC)