Now I have forgotten my password for Mr.grantevans2 so I am editing with the user name User:May122013.
I am the same person as Mr.Grantevans but I forgot my password for that account.(Originally posted Aug.20,2007)
My POV: If we can't have any privacy, why should the government? If we accept privacy of communications for the government and not for ourselves, then we are accepting that the government has more rights than the people. If we should be compliant with body scans and communication monitoring because of the "if you have nothing to hide, then you have nothing to worry about" mantra, then the government should be expected to be fully transparent by the same reasoning. I don't care which it is; privacy for both or privacy for neither, but no way in hell can we accept privacy for the government and not for the citizenry; that's tyranny!
Now I have forgotten my password for Mr.grantevans2 so I am editing with the user name User:May122013.
I am the same person as Mr.Grantevans but I forgot my password for that account.(Originally posted Aug.20,2007)
My POV: If we can't have any privacy, why should the government? If we accept privacy of communications for the government and not for ourselves, then we are accepting that the government has more rights than the people. If we should be compliant with body scans and communication monitoring because of the "if you have nothing to hide, then you have nothing to worry about" mantra, then the government should be expected to be fully transparent by the same reasoning. I don't care which it is; privacy for both or privacy for neither, but no way in hell can we accept privacy for the government and not for the citizenry; that's tyranny!