Kind words encourage:
- Excellent work correcting the IQ article! Keep up the good effort! A Very Manly Man ( talk) 07:20, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
- Good job fixing the more egregious issues in the Ashkenazi intelligence article. I've tried to structure it a bit, but it still has horrible prose flow overall. Heritability is an article in need of attention, if you're interested, of course; it's subject to regular POV pushing. Tijfo098 ( talk) 18:16, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks! This appears to me to be a useful and worthy addition to the article. I'm troubled by the organization of the whole Causes section, and have proposed a restructuring of it (see PTSD's Talk page), but this is part of a grander review/rewrite of whole article. This evolutionary stuff certainly should be a part of the revised, restructured content, in my opinion.
- I wonder if you would consider being more particular with your references (the second one appears to have a problem, by the way - look at the reference list). It's easier to control future bogus edits if references are placed immediately after the sentence which depends upon them, rather than at the end of a group of sentences. I hope I'm making sense.
Kind words encourage:
- Excellent work correcting the IQ article! Keep up the good effort! A Very Manly Man ( talk) 07:20, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
- Good job fixing the more egregious issues in the Ashkenazi intelligence article. I've tried to structure it a bit, but it still has horrible prose flow overall. Heritability is an article in need of attention, if you're interested, of course; it's subject to regular POV pushing. Tijfo098 ( talk) 18:16, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks! This appears to me to be a useful and worthy addition to the article. I'm troubled by the organization of the whole Causes section, and have proposed a restructuring of it (see PTSD's Talk page), but this is part of a grander review/rewrite of whole article. This evolutionary stuff certainly should be a part of the revised, restructured content, in my opinion.
- I wonder if you would consider being more particular with your references (the second one appears to have a problem, by the way - look at the reference list). It's easier to control future bogus edits if references are placed immediately after the sentence which depends upon them, rather than at the end of a group of sentences. I hope I'm making sense.