Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Mattisse/Proposed decision
My advisors, while well meaning, have not been following the plan. They have been blocking me after a very stale warning for edits the context of which they appear not to have taken into account, and without even bothering to consult with each other. Their existence gives editors who disagree with me a club to hold over my head. I have, in good faith, followed the plan for months, but it is time for it to end. I disavow it, and dismiss them, with my thanks for their well meaning efforts. If anyone cares to ask ArbCom for action, they are free to, but in the meantime I intend to edit as usual. With thanks — Mattisse ( Talk) 20:26, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
Within 15 days of this decision, Mattisse shall, in conjunction with one or more mentors or advisers, submit to this Committee for approval a plan to govern and guide her future editing with the continued assistance of those mentors or advisers. The plan shall seek to preserve Mattisse's valuable and rewarding contributions to Wikipedia while avoiding future disputes and the types of interactions that have been hurtful for herself and others. As a starting point in developing the plan, Mattisse and her mentors or advisors should consider the suggestions made by various users on the workshop page of this case, including but not limited to Mattisse's taking wikibreaks at times of stress, avoiding or limiting Mattisse's participation on certain pages, Mattisse's refraining from making any comments regarding the motivations or good faith of other users, and Mattisse's disengaging from interactions that become stressful or negative. The plan should also address how any lapses by Mattisse from the standards of behavior described in the plan shall be addressed.
I believe ArbCom is saying the important dimensions of my behavior that need to be addressed are the following:
Per Arbcom: Mattisse and her mentors or advisors should consider the suggestions made by various users on the workshop page of this case, including but not limited to Mattisse's taking wikibreaks at times of stress, avoiding or limiting Mattisse's participation on certain pages, Mattisse's refraining from making any comments regarding the motivations or good faith of other users, and Mattisse's disengaging from interactions that become stressful or negative.
I believe that ArbCom's suggestions are constructive and designed to encourage me to learn to cope by avoiding and/or disengaging from stressful situations before I engage in any of the disputes and other interactions that have been hurtful for me and for others in the past, while still allowing me to contribute to the encyclopedia at the same level of quality as before.
Techniques to reduce stress:
Measures my advisers/mentors may use to help me cope constructively:
The plan should also address how any lapses by Mattisse from the standards of behavior described in the plan shall be addressed.
The Arbitration Committee retains jurisdiction over the subject-matter of this case, as it does in any case. Should the preceding remedies fail to improve the situation described in this decision, after a reasonable time, an application may be made to reopen the case and impose other remedies as may be necessary.
This proposal is an escalating series of consequences for a failure to adhere to the plan, ending with a return to the jurisdiction of ArbCom:
Punishments:
I have the following list of editors who have provided significant interaction with me regarding advising/mentoring me. They have productively advised me in the past. I trust their judgment and I trust that they have Wikipedia's best interest at heart. I believe that it should be my responsibility to solicit and obtain advice in the manner most comfortable to me and to each adviser. (List compiled from Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Mattisse/Proposed_decision#Users_willing_to_act_as_advisers)
I will start a dedicated page User:Mattisse/Monitoring upon which my mentors/advisers may discuss my behavior and their advice, as well as any measure that may need to be taken to help me cope.
Per directions of NewYorkbrad, this plan was emailed to each arbcom member. I also posted it on the clerks notice board. It is also linked to the Workshop page. As far as I know, I have notified all arbcom member of this plan.
Regards,
— Mattisse ( Talk) 00:43, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
I do not have a clear idea what the Arbcom is looking for in this plan. I have done the best I can, trying to take into account the advice of those willing to give it, my mentors/advisers. I have tried to make the plan realistic, not placing a burden on others. As Fainities noted on the plan talk page, the vast majority of my edits are problem free. I have not had any problems since the arbitration started (exempting the incident that resulted in this arbitration, which both Art LaPella regarding DYK [5]) and Geometry guy elsewhere regarding the GAR did not see as inappropriate behavior on my part), although I have resumed my editing patterns employed since the RFC ended in January.
Any proposals/modifications/suggestions from the Arbcom as to the direction this plan should take or the specifics it should contain will be gratefully accepted and incorporated into the plan.
Regards,
— Mattisse ( Talk) 15:24, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Initiated by — Mattisse ( Talk) at 02:15, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
List of any users involved or directly affected, and confirmation that all are aware of the request:
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Mattisse/Proposed decision
My advisors, while well meaning, have not been following the plan. They have been blocking me after a very stale warning for edits the context of which they appear not to have taken into account, and without even bothering to consult with each other. Their existence gives editors who disagree with me a club to hold over my head. I have, in good faith, followed the plan for months, but it is time for it to end. I disavow it, and dismiss them, with my thanks for their well meaning efforts. If anyone cares to ask ArbCom for action, they are free to, but in the meantime I intend to edit as usual. With thanks — Mattisse ( Talk) 20:26, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
Within 15 days of this decision, Mattisse shall, in conjunction with one or more mentors or advisers, submit to this Committee for approval a plan to govern and guide her future editing with the continued assistance of those mentors or advisers. The plan shall seek to preserve Mattisse's valuable and rewarding contributions to Wikipedia while avoiding future disputes and the types of interactions that have been hurtful for herself and others. As a starting point in developing the plan, Mattisse and her mentors or advisors should consider the suggestions made by various users on the workshop page of this case, including but not limited to Mattisse's taking wikibreaks at times of stress, avoiding or limiting Mattisse's participation on certain pages, Mattisse's refraining from making any comments regarding the motivations or good faith of other users, and Mattisse's disengaging from interactions that become stressful or negative. The plan should also address how any lapses by Mattisse from the standards of behavior described in the plan shall be addressed.
I believe ArbCom is saying the important dimensions of my behavior that need to be addressed are the following:
Per Arbcom: Mattisse and her mentors or advisors should consider the suggestions made by various users on the workshop page of this case, including but not limited to Mattisse's taking wikibreaks at times of stress, avoiding or limiting Mattisse's participation on certain pages, Mattisse's refraining from making any comments regarding the motivations or good faith of other users, and Mattisse's disengaging from interactions that become stressful or negative.
I believe that ArbCom's suggestions are constructive and designed to encourage me to learn to cope by avoiding and/or disengaging from stressful situations before I engage in any of the disputes and other interactions that have been hurtful for me and for others in the past, while still allowing me to contribute to the encyclopedia at the same level of quality as before.
Techniques to reduce stress:
Measures my advisers/mentors may use to help me cope constructively:
The plan should also address how any lapses by Mattisse from the standards of behavior described in the plan shall be addressed.
The Arbitration Committee retains jurisdiction over the subject-matter of this case, as it does in any case. Should the preceding remedies fail to improve the situation described in this decision, after a reasonable time, an application may be made to reopen the case and impose other remedies as may be necessary.
This proposal is an escalating series of consequences for a failure to adhere to the plan, ending with a return to the jurisdiction of ArbCom:
Punishments:
I have the following list of editors who have provided significant interaction with me regarding advising/mentoring me. They have productively advised me in the past. I trust their judgment and I trust that they have Wikipedia's best interest at heart. I believe that it should be my responsibility to solicit and obtain advice in the manner most comfortable to me and to each adviser. (List compiled from Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Mattisse/Proposed_decision#Users_willing_to_act_as_advisers)
I will start a dedicated page User:Mattisse/Monitoring upon which my mentors/advisers may discuss my behavior and their advice, as well as any measure that may need to be taken to help me cope.
Per directions of NewYorkbrad, this plan was emailed to each arbcom member. I also posted it on the clerks notice board. It is also linked to the Workshop page. As far as I know, I have notified all arbcom member of this plan.
Regards,
— Mattisse ( Talk) 00:43, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
I do not have a clear idea what the Arbcom is looking for in this plan. I have done the best I can, trying to take into account the advice of those willing to give it, my mentors/advisers. I have tried to make the plan realistic, not placing a burden on others. As Fainities noted on the plan talk page, the vast majority of my edits are problem free. I have not had any problems since the arbitration started (exempting the incident that resulted in this arbitration, which both Art LaPella regarding DYK [5]) and Geometry guy elsewhere regarding the GAR did not see as inappropriate behavior on my part), although I have resumed my editing patterns employed since the RFC ended in January.
Any proposals/modifications/suggestions from the Arbcom as to the direction this plan should take or the specifics it should contain will be gratefully accepted and incorporated into the plan.
Regards,
— Mattisse ( Talk) 15:24, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Initiated by — Mattisse ( Talk) at 02:15, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
List of any users involved or directly affected, and confirmation that all are aware of the request: