This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{
no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared.
This username matched "Promotional? 2" on
the blacklist. --
DQB (
owner /
report) 19:20, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Note on file Usernames containing this string are often promotional in nature - check if this is the case --
DQB (
owner /
report) 19:20, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
This username matched "Used 2 instead of s attempting to skip filter: (pi55|p1ss|p155). Violating string: p1ss4s1" on
the blacklist. --
DQB (
owner /
report) 03:00, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Note on file this may be a deliberate obfuscation of "piss" --
DQB (
owner /
report) 03:00, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
This username matched "Used l instead of i attempting to skip filter: biatch. Violating string: biatchfordisaac77" on
the blacklist. --
DQB (
owner /
report) 12:10, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. --
DQB (
owner /
report) 19:20, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
This username matched "clinton|hillary|hilary|trump|drumpf|biden|obama|kamala" on
the blacklist. --
DQB (
owner /
report) 19:20, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Note on file possible reference to former or current U.S. president, VP, or candidate - please review --
DQB (
owner /
report) 19:20, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Note on file Usernames containing this string are often promotional in nature - check if this is the case --
DQB (
owner /
report) 23:30, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
This username matched "Used c instead of k attempting to skip filter: kike. Violating string: gulkikek.729" on
the blacklist. --
DQB (
owner /
report) 02:00, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Not a blatant violation of the username policy. It is? I would think it is more offensive to the uncle, and in any event they might well be self-identifying that way.
Daniel Case (
talk) 15:34, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Of note; the user posted to my talk page
here, explaining their edits as removing slander. The passage removed is not slander; it is sourced and true. --
Hammersoft (
talk) 19:37, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{
no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared.
This username matched "Promotional? 2" on
the blacklist. --
DQB (
owner /
report) 19:20, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Note on file Usernames containing this string are often promotional in nature - check if this is the case --
DQB (
owner /
report) 19:20, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
This username matched "Used 2 instead of s attempting to skip filter: (pi55|p1ss|p155). Violating string: p1ss4s1" on
the blacklist. --
DQB (
owner /
report) 03:00, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Note on file this may be a deliberate obfuscation of "piss" --
DQB (
owner /
report) 03:00, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
This username matched "Used l instead of i attempting to skip filter: biatch. Violating string: biatchfordisaac77" on
the blacklist. --
DQB (
owner /
report) 12:10, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. --
DQB (
owner /
report) 19:20, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
This username matched "clinton|hillary|hilary|trump|drumpf|biden|obama|kamala" on
the blacklist. --
DQB (
owner /
report) 19:20, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Note on file possible reference to former or current U.S. president, VP, or candidate - please review --
DQB (
owner /
report) 19:20, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Note on file Usernames containing this string are often promotional in nature - check if this is the case --
DQB (
owner /
report) 23:30, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
This username matched "Used c instead of k attempting to skip filter: kike. Violating string: gulkikek.729" on
the blacklist. --
DQB (
owner /
report) 02:00, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Not a blatant violation of the username policy. It is? I would think it is more offensive to the uncle, and in any event they might well be self-identifying that way.
Daniel Case (
talk) 15:34, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Of note; the user posted to my talk page
here, explaining their edits as removing slander. The passage removed is not slander; it is sourced and true. --
Hammersoft (
talk) 19:37, 9 May 2014 (UTC)