This page doesn't contain any user boxes or other fancy editing because I have better things to do with my time. I might jazz it up sometime when I'm bored.
I believe in the primacy of science and scientific thought. But that doesn't mean that I won't discuss other issues. I have an opinion about almost anything but that doesn't mean I'm opinionated.
I think I have a good sense of humor.
I am a spelling/grammar nazi.
I am atheist.
I practice
NPOV but I apply
WP:UNDUE strictly when it comes to scientific issues. Any
pseudoscience in wikipedia should be clearly labeled as such and debunked within the article. The only opposing arguments that should be mentioned in a scientific article are those arguments that have scientific validity. For example, in the article on
evolution there should be no mention of
creationism or
intelligent design because neither one of the two latter topics are a valid argument against
evolution. On the other hand, in the articles on
creationism and
intelligent design there should be a mention of
evolution because
evolution is a valid argument against the two former topics.
I do not give up easily. The only way you'll win an argument with me is to provide irrefutable evidence that I am wrong.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
My Viewpoints
This page doesn't contain any user boxes or other fancy editing because I have better things to do with my time. I might jazz it up sometime when I'm bored.
I believe in the primacy of science and scientific thought. But that doesn't mean that I won't discuss other issues. I have an opinion about almost anything but that doesn't mean I'm opinionated.
I think I have a good sense of humor.
I am a spelling/grammar nazi.
I am atheist.
I practice
NPOV but I apply
WP:UNDUE strictly when it comes to scientific issues. Any
pseudoscience in wikipedia should be clearly labeled as such and debunked within the article. The only opposing arguments that should be mentioned in a scientific article are those arguments that have scientific validity. For example, in the article on
evolution there should be no mention of
creationism or
intelligent design because neither one of the two latter topics are a valid argument against
evolution. On the other hand, in the articles on
creationism and
intelligent design there should be a mention of
evolution because
evolution is a valid argument against the two former topics.
I do not give up easily. The only way you'll win an argument with me is to provide irrefutable evidence that I am wrong.