This is my basic personal grading criteria for !voting in RfA's. Even if you meet this criteria, it does not guarantee that I will give you a support !vote in your RfA. I might not even !vote in your RfA. This is what I look for:

1. User has more than 3500 edits.
2. User has not been blocked ever. If they have, it should be at least 6+ months ago. Blocks relating to vandalism should be 1+ years ago.
3. User shows a history of patrolling others' work (patrolling new pages, reviewing revisions if they have the reviewer userright, ect.).
4. User often combats vandalism (manually and automatically).
5. User has a history of making manual edits.
6. User does not have a tendency to bite other editors.
7. User is active in at least one WikiProject.
8. User often reports vandals/ users with an inappropriate username/3RR violators/Sockpuppeteers and their sockpuppets to the correct notice board with the correct format.
9. User request pages often vandalized that they have reverted on many times recently to the RfPP noticeboard.

If the user meets 7-9 of these criteria, the are likely to get a support !vote from me. If they meet 5-6 of these criteria, they will probably get a neutral !vote from me. If they meet only 4 or less of these criteria, they are almost guaranteed to get a oppose !vote. If you would like to contact me with any question regarding the way I grade RfA candidates, feel free to do so on my talk page.