 | Evaluate an article
Complete your article evaluation below. Here are the key aspects to consider: Lead sectionA good lead section defines the topic and provides a concise overview. A reader who just wants to identify the topic can read the first sentence. A reader who wants a very brief overview of the most important things about it can read the first paragraph. A reader who wants a quick overview can read the whole lead section.
ContentA good Wikipedia article should cover all the important aspects of a topic, without putting too much weight on one part while neglecting another.
Tone and BalanceWikipedia articles should be written from a neutral point of view; if there are substantial differences of interpretation or controversies among published, reliable sources, those views should be described as fairly as possible.
Sources and ReferencesA Wikipedia article should be based on the best sources available for the topic at hand. When possible, this means academic and peer-reviewed publications or scholarly books.
Organization and writing qualityThe writing should be clear and professional, the content should be organized sensibly into sections.
Images and Media
Talk page discussionThe article's talk page — and any discussions among other Wikipedia editors that have been taking place there — can be a useful window into the state of an article, and might help you focus on important aspects that you didn't think of.
Overall impressions
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved. |
Which article are you evaluating?
Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I choose the article on gender studies because during the last few decades female involvement had been growing, according to history, females were considered the weakness of society, in some cultures, females are unable to give opinions, vote, or be part of political parties.
Gender studies do not belong to female or masculine terms, it is neutral and promotes gender equality. It is an interesting topic with a vast of research, helpful in the moment to collect information for a project assignment.
Evaluate the article
The article was last time edited in May 2022. The information looks updated. It can be improved by adding information on how gender studies are perceived in Mexico and Central America, I grow up in Mexico and I know how to obtain research related to the attitude of the population in relation to gender studies.
The misinterpretation of the feminist term has caused damage to the Society in Latin American countries, caused by the male dominance and the repression of women.
The citations and link work and looks reliable, the bibliographic references are the support that the article is trustworthy. The article has no bias, it includes the history of some countries and the perception of gender roles.
In conclusion, the article is amazing, but it will be better if I add the history of gender studies from Latin America including research on how those groups considered vulnerable had revolutionized through the time.
| Evaluate an article
Complete your article evaluation below. Here are the key aspects to consider: Lead sectionA good lead section defines the topic and provides a concise overview. A reader who just wants to identify the topic can read the first sentence. A reader who wants a very brief overview of the most important things about it can read the first paragraph. A reader who wants a quick overview can read the whole lead section.
ContentA good Wikipedia article should cover all the important aspects of a topic, without putting too much weight on one part while neglecting another.
Tone and BalanceWikipedia articles should be written from a neutral point of view; if there are substantial differences of interpretation or controversies among published, reliable sources, those views should be described as fairly as possible.
Sources and ReferencesA Wikipedia article should be based on the best sources available for the topic at hand. When possible, this means academic and peer-reviewed publications or scholarly books.
Organization and writing qualityThe writing should be clear and professional, the content should be organized sensibly into sections.
Images and Media
Talk page discussionThe article's talk page — and any discussions among other Wikipedia editors that have been taking place there — can be a useful window into the state of an article, and might help you focus on important aspects that you didn't think of.
Overall impressions
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved. |
Which article are you evaluating?
Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I choose the article on gender studies because during the last few decades female involvement had been growing, according to history, females were considered the weakness of society, in some cultures, females are unable to give opinions, vote, or be part of political parties.
Gender studies do not belong to female or masculine terms, it is neutral and promotes gender equality. It is an interesting topic with a vast of research, helpful in the moment to collect information for a project assignment.
Evaluate the article
The article was last time edited in May 2022. The information looks updated. It can be improved by adding information on how gender studies are perceived in Mexico and Central America, I grow up in Mexico and I know how to obtain research related to the attitude of the population in relation to gender studies.
The misinterpretation of the feminist term has caused damage to the Society in Latin American countries, caused by the male dominance and the repression of women.
The citations and link work and looks reliable, the bibliographic references are the support that the article is trustworthy. The article has no bias, it includes the history of some countries and the perception of gender roles.
In conclusion, the article is amazing, but it will be better if I add the history of gender studies from Latin America including research on how those groups considered vulnerable had revolutionized through the time.