 | Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional ResourcesCheck out the Editing Wikipedia PDF for general editing tips and suggestions. |
General info
- Whose work are you reviewing?
Yidanlong
Evaluate the drafted changes
The Lead paragraph is unbiased and offers a detailed overview of this film's plot. It is helpful that information about the director and cast is present; I think that including some more in-depth information about the director/production company of the film in this section would add more clarity.
The table added in to represent the awards Operation Red Sea under the category Reception and Accolades was either nominated for or won was a great visual aid in understanding the reception of the film by media and critics. Perhaps going into greater detail about the reception by Chinese audiences as well as international audiences (if that information is available) would enrich this section a little bit!
Your body section focused on the character list is great for getting to know characters and their roles in the film's plot. Adding in links to existing wikipedia pages belonging to the actors and actresses would be helpful I think just to get a well-rounded look at the cast and their own acting histories.
In terms of things that I think this article could benefit from is more information regarding the significance of the events covered by the film and maybe why this film was made in response. Just a bit of grammatical editing and reviewing will also smooth everything out and make it a little bit easier to understand. I am limited in reviewing the peer-reviewed sources and other media you've sited here because I am only able to read articles written in English.
| Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional ResourcesCheck out the Editing Wikipedia PDF for general editing tips and suggestions. |
General info
- Whose work are you reviewing?
Yidanlong
Evaluate the drafted changes
The Lead paragraph is unbiased and offers a detailed overview of this film's plot. It is helpful that information about the director and cast is present; I think that including some more in-depth information about the director/production company of the film in this section would add more clarity.
The table added in to represent the awards Operation Red Sea under the category Reception and Accolades was either nominated for or won was a great visual aid in understanding the reception of the film by media and critics. Perhaps going into greater detail about the reception by Chinese audiences as well as international audiences (if that information is available) would enrich this section a little bit!
Your body section focused on the character list is great for getting to know characters and their roles in the film's plot. Adding in links to existing wikipedia pages belonging to the actors and actresses would be helpful I think just to get a well-rounded look at the cast and their own acting histories.
In terms of things that I think this article could benefit from is more information regarding the significance of the events covered by the film and maybe why this film was made in response. Just a bit of grammatical editing and reviewing will also smooth everything out and make it a little bit easier to understand. I am limited in reviewing the peer-reviewed sources and other media you've sited here because I am only able to read articles written in English.