![]() | Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional ResourcesCheck out the Editing Wikipedia PDF for general editing tips and suggestions. |
Yidanlong
Currently there are three sections in the lead portion of the draft. They are all fairly simple yet straight forward summaries of the points that are trying to push through. However, it seems that there is more room to elaborate on the sections, particularly the summary of the plot. The background information provided about the historical context was very interesting and added needed context to the article. Additionally, since the section of "characters" is new, I think it would be beneficial to provide a bit more information on each character if possible.
![]() | Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional ResourcesCheck out the Editing Wikipedia PDF for general editing tips and suggestions. |
Yidanlong
Currently there are three sections in the lead portion of the draft. They are all fairly simple yet straight forward summaries of the points that are trying to push through. However, it seems that there is more room to elaborate on the sections, particularly the summary of the plot. The background information provided about the historical context was very interesting and added needed context to the article. Additionally, since the section of "characters" is new, I think it would be beneficial to provide a bit more information on each character if possible.