I have removed your "too long" tag. Given the breadth of the topic, I consider the introduction to be a model of brevity. -- Rodhullandemu ( Talk) 18:44, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing the vandalism. Perhaps you didn't intend your edit to be missing an edit summary? If you include one such as "reverting vandalism", it shows up on other editors' watchlists telling them what the edit is without their having to click on your edit to see it was a vandalism fix. Thanks for catching the vandalism. Hope to see you around, - Neparis ( talk) 02:51, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
The article already has a "citations required" tag at the top, so there is no need to go through tagging each unsourced statement. It would probably be a better use of effort to find sources for those assertions. -- Rodhullandemu ( Talk) 14:46, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
You incorrectly marked the edit as vandalism, and inappropriately warned the IP user. Checking the source on the content that was removed showed an old article with no relation to the new content. A google search was unable to turn up any hits as well. I have reverted the edit and left a message on the IP user's page. Looking at the history I saw the edit was originally made
here by a user with a history of vandalism. I suggest in the future you slow down a bit in your revisions to make sure you get the whole story. --
TRTX
T /
C 17:15, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Hiya. I don't know if the template you use to advise editors you've reported to WP:AIV is a bespoke one, or one from twinkle, but if you see this diff [1] it's not being closed properly and so runs on across the page. You may want to fix it :) Thanks for you help BTW Pedro : Chat 13:42, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
The item I added regarding that the threat that Malan supposedly made against Formby is a fabrication is correct,can you please point out that this incident could not have taken place .The National party only came into power in 1948, two years after Formby's tour of S A. Malan was in no position to threaten anybody.The incident never occurred, the source (The Guardian) is incorrect
81.151.143.16 (
talk) 17:56, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your comments, however this still does not address the issue that gave rise to my original posting
81.151.143.16 (
talk) —Preceding
comment was added at 21:35, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
I am editing in good faith. Have you really looked into the results of my edits? I think you are not polite to define my editing as disruptive. --
59.149.32.77 (
talk) 10:00, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Please, there is no vandalism
90.241.44.21 (
talk) 12:24, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting vandalis on my talk page! StaticGull Talk 14:28, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
The external link I posted was for an informational resource that does not require any payment or account to access or view. I feel this is a linkworthy site that can add genuine value to research in the semiconductor industry. It does not promote any specific company or organization. 11:20, 08 May 2008 (UTC)
{{help me}}
Please could I have a second opinion. I reverted an edit made by User:195.173.69.2 to Physical vapor deposition after the user added this external link into the article ( http://www.semi-directory.com ) believing it to be vandalism as it provides links to other websites to purchase items. As the user quite rightly states, however, (see the message above), the website itself is not a promotion and does not encourage you to pay anything. So is this an ok site or not? Thanks yettie0711 ( talk) 10:41, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Regards, Themintyman ( talk) 12:46, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for whacking the vandals - Zed —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zednaught ( talk • contribs) 21:32, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Um, hi Yettie0711..I'm not sure how to create one of those content lines, so I'm going to try to type on an already created one. Well, I wanted to apoligize for what I wrote on The Indigo Children page, I don't even remember what I wrote really, ha ha =D I did create an account, like the message suggested. But anyway I think what I wrote was probably sort of angry sounding, if I uhhh remember right. I just wanted to let you know that I am not one of the bad guys and I was just voicing my opinion in the wrong way at the wrong place. Thanks for showing me that. Wikipedia is not the place to fight the battle I was trying to. So, that would be pretty much it. Have a good day! -Hiya447777
Hi there, i've just undone your revert. I'm not quite sure what you wanted to achieve, but if you take out that table closer, the whole end of the page goes wonky! --Ged UK ( talk) 18:27, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for identifying a problem with this article. It is customary, and courteous to editors who have spent many hours working on it, to explain your concerns in more detail on the talk page so that they can be discussed, or addressed quickly and satisfactorily. Thanks. The JPS talk to me 16:15, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
I have removed your "too long" tag. Given the breadth of the topic, I consider the introduction to be a model of brevity. -- Rodhullandemu ( Talk) 18:44, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing the vandalism. Perhaps you didn't intend your edit to be missing an edit summary? If you include one such as "reverting vandalism", it shows up on other editors' watchlists telling them what the edit is without their having to click on your edit to see it was a vandalism fix. Thanks for catching the vandalism. Hope to see you around, - Neparis ( talk) 02:51, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
The article already has a "citations required" tag at the top, so there is no need to go through tagging each unsourced statement. It would probably be a better use of effort to find sources for those assertions. -- Rodhullandemu ( Talk) 14:46, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
You incorrectly marked the edit as vandalism, and inappropriately warned the IP user. Checking the source on the content that was removed showed an old article with no relation to the new content. A google search was unable to turn up any hits as well. I have reverted the edit and left a message on the IP user's page. Looking at the history I saw the edit was originally made
here by a user with a history of vandalism. I suggest in the future you slow down a bit in your revisions to make sure you get the whole story. --
TRTX
T /
C 17:15, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Hiya. I don't know if the template you use to advise editors you've reported to WP:AIV is a bespoke one, or one from twinkle, but if you see this diff [1] it's not being closed properly and so runs on across the page. You may want to fix it :) Thanks for you help BTW Pedro : Chat 13:42, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
The item I added regarding that the threat that Malan supposedly made against Formby is a fabrication is correct,can you please point out that this incident could not have taken place .The National party only came into power in 1948, two years after Formby's tour of S A. Malan was in no position to threaten anybody.The incident never occurred, the source (The Guardian) is incorrect
81.151.143.16 (
talk) 17:56, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your comments, however this still does not address the issue that gave rise to my original posting
81.151.143.16 (
talk) —Preceding
comment was added at 21:35, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
I am editing in good faith. Have you really looked into the results of my edits? I think you are not polite to define my editing as disruptive. --
59.149.32.77 (
talk) 10:00, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Please, there is no vandalism
90.241.44.21 (
talk) 12:24, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting vandalis on my talk page! StaticGull Talk 14:28, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
The external link I posted was for an informational resource that does not require any payment or account to access or view. I feel this is a linkworthy site that can add genuine value to research in the semiconductor industry. It does not promote any specific company or organization. 11:20, 08 May 2008 (UTC)
{{help me}}
Please could I have a second opinion. I reverted an edit made by User:195.173.69.2 to Physical vapor deposition after the user added this external link into the article ( http://www.semi-directory.com ) believing it to be vandalism as it provides links to other websites to purchase items. As the user quite rightly states, however, (see the message above), the website itself is not a promotion and does not encourage you to pay anything. So is this an ok site or not? Thanks yettie0711 ( talk) 10:41, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Regards, Themintyman ( talk) 12:46, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for whacking the vandals - Zed —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zednaught ( talk • contribs) 21:32, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Um, hi Yettie0711..I'm not sure how to create one of those content lines, so I'm going to try to type on an already created one. Well, I wanted to apoligize for what I wrote on The Indigo Children page, I don't even remember what I wrote really, ha ha =D I did create an account, like the message suggested. But anyway I think what I wrote was probably sort of angry sounding, if I uhhh remember right. I just wanted to let you know that I am not one of the bad guys and I was just voicing my opinion in the wrong way at the wrong place. Thanks for showing me that. Wikipedia is not the place to fight the battle I was trying to. So, that would be pretty much it. Have a good day! -Hiya447777
Hi there, i've just undone your revert. I'm not quite sure what you wanted to achieve, but if you take out that table closer, the whole end of the page goes wonky! --Ged UK ( talk) 18:27, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for identifying a problem with this article. It is customary, and courteous to editors who have spent many hours working on it, to explain your concerns in more detail on the talk page so that they can be discussed, or addressed quickly and satisfactorily. Thanks. The JPS talk to me 16:15, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)