USER:WIQI55 - Encyclopedia Information

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User Space


16 May 2024
News and notes: Democracy in action: multiple elections Special report: Will the new RfA reform come to the rescue of administrators? Arbitration report: Ruined temples for posterity to ponder over – arbitration from '22 to '24 In the media: Deadnames on the French Wikipedia, and a duel between Russian wikis Op-Ed: Wikidata to split as sheer volume of information overloads infrastructure Comix: Generations Traffic report: Crawl out through the fallout, baby
Single page Front page About Subscribe Suggestions Archives

Biographical Encyclopedia of Astronomers

Tags

What to type	What it makes
{{ fact}} links talk	^{[ citation needed]}
{{ Timefact}} links talk	^{[ chronology citation needed]}
{{ dubious}} links talk	^{[ dubious – discuss]}
{{ or}} links talk	^{[ original research?]}
{{ request quote}} links talk	^{[ need quotation to verify]}
{{ failed verification}} links talk	^{[ failed verification]}
{{ page number}} links talk	^{[ page needed]}
{{ verify credibility}} links talk	^{[ unreliable source?]}
{{ verify source}} links talk	^{[ verification needed]}
{{ what}} links talk	^{[ clarification needed]}
{{ who}} links talk	^[ who?]
{{ which}} links talk	^[ which?]
{{ copyvio link}} links talk	^{[ infringing link?]}
{{ dead link}} links talk	^{[ dead link]}

Inline cleanup tags

Attribution

Clarity

Miscellaneous

Neutrality

Precision

{{ By how much}} {{ Definition}} {{ Definition needed}} {{ Example needed}} {{ Example needed span}} {{ Explain}} {{ How}} {{ How often}} {{ Misquoted}} {{ Quantify}} {{ Specify}} {{ Vague}} {{ When}} {{ Where}} {{ Which}} {{ Who else}} {{ Why}} {{ Year needed}}
Excessive	{{ Overly detailed inline}} {{ Duplication span}} {{ Importance inline}} {{ Relevance inline}} {{ Undue weight inline}} {{ Globalize inline}} {{ Infobox clutter}}

Time-sensitivity

Verifiability

Dubious	{{ Contradictory inline}} {{ Disputed inline}} {{ Dubious}} {{ Dubious span}} {{ Inconsistent}} {{ Needs independent confirmation}} {{ Speculation inline}}
Bare URLs	{{ Bare URL inline}} {{ Bare URL non-HTML}} {{ Bare URL AV media}} {{ Bare URL PDF}} {{ Bare URL image}} {{ Bare URL DOC}} {{ Bare URL plain text}} {{ Bare URL spreadsheet}}
Incomplete or broken citation	{{ Author incomplete}} {{ Author missing}} {{ Date missing}} {{ Dead link}} {{ Edition needed}} {{ Episode needed}} {{ Full citation needed}} {{ Incomplete short citation}} {{ ISBN missing}} {{ Moved resource}} {{ Page needed}} {{ Place missing}} {{ Publisher missing}} {{ Season needed}} {{ Time needed}} {{ Title incomplete}} {{ Title missing}} {{ Volume needed}} {{ Year missing}}
Missing or problematic reference	{{ Additional citation needed}} {{ Better source needed}} {{ Better source needed example}} {{ Check quotation}} {{ Chronology citation needed}} {{ Circular reference}} {{ Citation needed}} {{ Citation needed span}} {{ Citation not found}} {{ Close paraphrasing inline}} {{ COI source}} {{ Deprecated inline}} {{ Excessive citations inline}} {{ Failed verification}} {{ Failed verification span}} {{ Image reference needed}} {{ Irrelevant citation}} {{ Medical citation needed}} {{ Medical citation needed span}} {{ Nonspecific}} {{ Not verified in body}} {{ Obsolete source}} {{ Page range too broad}} {{ Primary source inline}} {{ Promotional source}} {{ Quote without source}} {{ Request quotation}} {{ Request quotation span}} {{ Retracted}} {{ Scientific citation needed}} {{ Self-published inline}} {{ Tertiary source inline}} {{ Third-party inline}} {{ Unreliable fringe source}} {{ Unreliable medical source}} {{ Unreliable source?}} {{ Verify quote}} {{ Verify source}}

Wording

General advice

v t e Citation and verifiability article maintenance templates
Sourcing	{{ Circular}} {{ Dubious}} {{ Excessive citations}} {{ Further reading cleanup}} {{ More citations needed}} {{ More citations needed section}} {{ More footnotes needed}} {{ No footnotes}} {{ No significant coverage}} {{ One source}} {{ One source section}} {{ Only primary sources}} {{ NRIS only}} {{ Primary sources}} {{ Primary sources section}} {{ Religious text primary}} {{ Self-published}} {{ Self-reference cleanup}} {{ Self-sourcing examples}} {{ Refexample section}} {{ Sources exist}} {{ Text-source}} {{ Third-party}} {{ Unreferenced}} {{ Unreferenced section}} {{ Unreferenced category}} {{ Unreliable sources}} {{ Unreliable sources section}} {{ User-generated}}
BLP-specific	{{ BLP unreferenced}} {{ BLP unreferenced section}} {{ BLP primary sources}} {{ BLP self-published}} {{ BLP sources}} {{ BLP sources section}} {{ BLP IMDb-only refimprove}} {{ BLP IMDb refimprove}} {{ BLP no footnotes}} {{ BLP more footnotes needed}} {{ BLP one source}}
Topic specific	{{ Localist}} {{ Media IMDb refimprove}} {{ More medical citations needed}} {{ More science citations needed}} {{ Neologism}} {{ Science review}} {{ Unreferenced law}} {{ Unreferenced-law section}} {{ Unreferenced medical section}}
Dispute-related	{{ Cite check}} {{ Cite check section}} {{ Content}} {{ Disputed}} {{ Dispute about}} {{ Disputed section}} {{ Disputed chem}} {{ Disputed list}} {{ Disputed map}} {{ Expert needed}} {{ Hoax}} {{ Original research}} {{ Original research section}} {{ Speculation}} {{ Speculation section}} {{ Synthesis}} {{ Verifiability}} {{ Verify sources}}
Citation improvements	{{ Citation style}} {{ Citations broken}} {{ Cleanup bare URLs}} {{ Format footnotes}} {{ Full citations needed}} {{ Ibid}} {{ Page numbers improve}} {{ Page numbers needed}} {{ Shallow references}}
General advice	Citing sources Reliable sources Maintenance template removal Citation needed Find sources Combining sources Referencing styles

Awards

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for your help! J N 466 07:28, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		For your contribution in Muhammad article that led to a nice solution - Ascetic Rosé 14:47, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

	The Original Barnstar
	to hard work and try to keep wikipedia free from biasied information and trying to keep articles as objective as possible. For working in a empirical way and and same time beeing diplomatic , detailing out real facts from biasied facts, I awared this banner to you dear Wiqi , keep up the good work, best regards Siktirgitir ( talk) 03:31, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User:Wiqi55&oldid=1142146258"

Muslim Wikipedians

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User Space


16 May 2024
News and notes: Democracy in action: multiple elections Special report: Will the new RfA reform come to the rescue of administrators? Arbitration report: Ruined temples for posterity to ponder over – arbitration from '22 to '24 In the media: Deadnames on the French Wikipedia, and a duel between Russian wikis Op-Ed: Wikidata to split as sheer volume of information overloads infrastructure Comix: Generations Traffic report: Crawl out through the fallout, baby
Single page Front page About Subscribe Suggestions Archives

Biographical Encyclopedia of Astronomers

Tags

What to type	What it makes
{{ fact}} links talk	^{[ citation needed]}
{{ Timefact}} links talk	^{[ chronology citation needed]}
{{ dubious}} links talk	^{[ dubious – discuss]}
{{ or}} links talk	^{[ original research?]}
{{ request quote}} links talk	^{[ need quotation to verify]}
{{ failed verification}} links talk	^{[ failed verification]}
{{ page number}} links talk	^{[ page needed]}
{{ verify credibility}} links talk	^{[ unreliable source?]}
{{ verify source}} links talk	^{[ verification needed]}
{{ what}} links talk	^{[ clarification needed]}
{{ who}} links talk	^[ who?]
{{ which}} links talk	^[ which?]
{{ copyvio link}} links talk	^{[ infringing link?]}
{{ dead link}} links talk	^{[ dead link]}

Inline cleanup tags

Attribution

Clarity

Miscellaneous

Neutrality

Precision

{{ By how much}} {{ Definition}} {{ Definition needed}} {{ Example needed}} {{ Example needed span}} {{ Explain}} {{ How}} {{ How often}} {{ Misquoted}} {{ Quantify}} {{ Specify}} {{ Vague}} {{ When}} {{ Where}} {{ Which}} {{ Who else}} {{ Why}} {{ Year needed}}
Excessive	{{ Overly detailed inline}} {{ Duplication span}} {{ Importance inline}} {{ Relevance inline}} {{ Undue weight inline}} {{ Globalize inline}} {{ Infobox clutter}}

Time-sensitivity

Verifiability

Dubious	{{ Contradictory inline}} {{ Disputed inline}} {{ Dubious}} {{ Dubious span}} {{ Inconsistent}} {{ Needs independent confirmation}} {{ Speculation inline}}
Bare URLs	{{ Bare URL inline}} {{ Bare URL non-HTML}} {{ Bare URL AV media}} {{ Bare URL PDF}} {{ Bare URL image}} {{ Bare URL DOC}} {{ Bare URL plain text}} {{ Bare URL spreadsheet}}
Incomplete or broken citation	{{ Author incomplete}} {{ Author missing}} {{ Date missing}} {{ Dead link}} {{ Edition needed}} {{ Episode needed}} {{ Full citation needed}} {{ Incomplete short citation}} {{ ISBN missing}} {{ Moved resource}} {{ Page needed}} {{ Place missing}} {{ Publisher missing}} {{ Season needed}} {{ Time needed}} {{ Title incomplete}} {{ Title missing}} {{ Volume needed}} {{ Year missing}}
Missing or problematic reference	{{ Additional citation needed}} {{ Better source needed}} {{ Better source needed example}} {{ Check quotation}} {{ Chronology citation needed}} {{ Circular reference}} {{ Citation needed}} {{ Citation needed span}} {{ Citation not found}} {{ Close paraphrasing inline}} {{ COI source}} {{ Deprecated inline}} {{ Excessive citations inline}} {{ Failed verification}} {{ Failed verification span}} {{ Image reference needed}} {{ Irrelevant citation}} {{ Medical citation needed}} {{ Medical citation needed span}} {{ Nonspecific}} {{ Not verified in body}} {{ Obsolete source}} {{ Page range too broad}} {{ Primary source inline}} {{ Promotional source}} {{ Quote without source}} {{ Request quotation}} {{ Request quotation span}} {{ Retracted}} {{ Scientific citation needed}} {{ Self-published inline}} {{ Tertiary source inline}} {{ Third-party inline}} {{ Unreliable fringe source}} {{ Unreliable medical source}} {{ Unreliable source?}} {{ Verify quote}} {{ Verify source}}

Wording

General advice

v t e Citation and verifiability article maintenance templates
Sourcing	{{ Circular}} {{ Dubious}} {{ Excessive citations}} {{ Further reading cleanup}} {{ More citations needed}} {{ More citations needed section}} {{ More footnotes needed}} {{ No footnotes}} {{ No significant coverage}} {{ One source}} {{ One source section}} {{ Only primary sources}} {{ NRIS only}} {{ Primary sources}} {{ Primary sources section}} {{ Religious text primary}} {{ Self-published}} {{ Self-reference cleanup}} {{ Self-sourcing examples}} {{ Refexample section}} {{ Sources exist}} {{ Text-source}} {{ Third-party}} {{ Unreferenced}} {{ Unreferenced section}} {{ Unreferenced category}} {{ Unreliable sources}} {{ Unreliable sources section}} {{ User-generated}}
BLP-specific	{{ BLP unreferenced}} {{ BLP unreferenced section}} {{ BLP primary sources}} {{ BLP self-published}} {{ BLP sources}} {{ BLP sources section}} {{ BLP IMDb-only refimprove}} {{ BLP IMDb refimprove}} {{ BLP no footnotes}} {{ BLP more footnotes needed}} {{ BLP one source}}
Topic specific	{{ Localist}} {{ Media IMDb refimprove}} {{ More medical citations needed}} {{ More science citations needed}} {{ Neologism}} {{ Science review}} {{ Unreferenced law}} {{ Unreferenced-law section}} {{ Unreferenced medical section}}
Dispute-related	{{ Cite check}} {{ Cite check section}} {{ Content}} {{ Disputed}} {{ Dispute about}} {{ Disputed section}} {{ Disputed chem}} {{ Disputed list}} {{ Disputed map}} {{ Expert needed}} {{ Hoax}} {{ Original research}} {{ Original research section}} {{ Speculation}} {{ Speculation section}} {{ Synthesis}} {{ Verifiability}} {{ Verify sources}}
Citation improvements	{{ Citation style}} {{ Citations broken}} {{ Cleanup bare URLs}} {{ Format footnotes}} {{ Full citations needed}} {{ Ibid}} {{ Page numbers improve}} {{ Page numbers needed}} {{ Shallow references}}
General advice	Citing sources Reliable sources Maintenance template removal Citation needed Find sources Combining sources Referencing styles

Awards

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for your help! J N 466 07:28, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		For your contribution in Muhammad article that led to a nice solution - Ascetic Rosé 14:47, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

	The Original Barnstar
	to hard work and try to keep wikipedia free from biasied information and trying to keep articles as objective as possible. For working in a empirical way and and same time beeing diplomatic , detailing out real facts from biasied facts, I awared this banner to you dear Wiqi , keep up the good work, best regards Siktirgitir ( talk) 03:31, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User:Wiqi55&oldid=1142146258"

Muslim Wikipedians

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook