You must not want anyone to leave a message. This talk page redirect to your user page. And the user page redirects to your talk page. If that's really what you mean to do, then revert this.. - Fnlayson ( talk) 23:07, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Before redirecting/deleting entire pages, it is generally considered proper to open a discussion on the talk page of the article in question, e.g., mousegun, and even post a merge tag on the article pointing to a discussion for a period of 5 days or so, building consensus. Otherwise, one editor's unilateral decision to delete content is viewed as vandalism. Thanks. Yaf ( talk) 04:27, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Actually, the only part of Bowning's 1893 patent which was carried forward into the Model 1912 was the reloading carrier: the bolt and trigger lock were all Johnson's.-- Solicitr ( talk) 21:59, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
This replacement stuff the IP user keeps adding to the M16 article is mainly about replacing the M4 Carbine. So I don't think that belongs anywhere in the M16 article. Just thought I'd point out another reason to remove this stuff. - Fnlayson ( talk) 05:12, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I've seen you've been keeping the vandals at bay, appreciate that, but some of your other edits are a bit cryptic and confusing. What for isntance do you mean by "firearm" "Rifle" and "Weapon" not interchangeable" in tke AK-74 article? I used that wording to diversify the vocabulary, make the article seem a little more publish-worthy. Koalorka ( talk) 18:24, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Per [2], what modern U.S. weapons is that cartridge used in? The only thing I see is a German sniper rifle not used by the U.S.-- Patton 123 15:50, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Sorry but how was that advertising? Its a fellow wiki like this one. Advertising would be "hey everybody come buy my guns at Amazon.com. Not telling people about a wiki. SteelersFan- 9 4 18:30, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
You asked to be e-mailed for an explanation. Unfortunately you don't have e-mail enabled.
If you would like to email me with your explanation... Mayalld ( talk) 08:34, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
WP:HYPHEN says "A hyphen is not used after a standard -ly adverb (a newly available home, a wholly owned subsidiary) unless part of a larger compound". That part of the guideline is completely clear. Please do not revert changes that I or other editors make to bring articles into compliance with it. Chris the speller yack 23:34, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing that, I saw it a few weeks ago, meant to fix it and it slipped my mind!-- Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 10:33, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi you reverted by edit to the suppressor === Real-world data === section on the following basis
(Removing welrod as it is a highly specialized gimick gun whereas the de lesile is signifiantly more common. The example was good to begin with. No need for a laundry list or a 'top 10' list.)
The Wellrod had around 2800 built The De Lisle carbines around 130
The Wellrod has continued in use, where as the de lisle stopped in the Korean War.
Would like to put it back thx RonaldDuncan ( talk) 10:57, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Blow_forward needs a serious cleanup: the images don't explain what the difference is (they all show the same). Also, the SIG AK52 WAS a blow-forward! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.160.47.242 ( talk) 14:57, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
I noticed your recent edit of subject article and your response to subsequent edits. I suggest you review Wikipedia:Verifiability. I have no doubt the information you provided can be verified, and would be happy to help you with the appropriate inline citation formatting if you wish. Where did you find the information about the relationship between the two models and the production total for the replacement model? Thewellman ( talk) 20:08, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
<ref name=rsa>{{cite journal |last=Marcot |first=Roy |year=2007 |title=Remington Model 29 Shotguns |journal=RSA Journal |volume= |issue=3rd Quarter |pages= |publisher=Remington Society of America }}</ref>
Alright then, its just that it has a similar operation if you read the patent. Howabout moving it to the discussion page? Uiyugr 02:41AM, 27/04/2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the correction on MOS for trademarks. I knew there was something on it, but I couldn't remember what the convention was (and apparently wasn't searching well). I'll keep it in mind! Regards, Appable ( talk | contributions) 04:02, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
You must not want anyone to leave a message. This talk page redirect to your user page. And the user page redirects to your talk page. If that's really what you mean to do, then revert this.. - Fnlayson ( talk) 23:07, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Before redirecting/deleting entire pages, it is generally considered proper to open a discussion on the talk page of the article in question, e.g., mousegun, and even post a merge tag on the article pointing to a discussion for a period of 5 days or so, building consensus. Otherwise, one editor's unilateral decision to delete content is viewed as vandalism. Thanks. Yaf ( talk) 04:27, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Actually, the only part of Bowning's 1893 patent which was carried forward into the Model 1912 was the reloading carrier: the bolt and trigger lock were all Johnson's.-- Solicitr ( talk) 21:59, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
This replacement stuff the IP user keeps adding to the M16 article is mainly about replacing the M4 Carbine. So I don't think that belongs anywhere in the M16 article. Just thought I'd point out another reason to remove this stuff. - Fnlayson ( talk) 05:12, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I've seen you've been keeping the vandals at bay, appreciate that, but some of your other edits are a bit cryptic and confusing. What for isntance do you mean by "firearm" "Rifle" and "Weapon" not interchangeable" in tke AK-74 article? I used that wording to diversify the vocabulary, make the article seem a little more publish-worthy. Koalorka ( talk) 18:24, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Per [2], what modern U.S. weapons is that cartridge used in? The only thing I see is a German sniper rifle not used by the U.S.-- Patton 123 15:50, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Sorry but how was that advertising? Its a fellow wiki like this one. Advertising would be "hey everybody come buy my guns at Amazon.com. Not telling people about a wiki. SteelersFan- 9 4 18:30, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
You asked to be e-mailed for an explanation. Unfortunately you don't have e-mail enabled.
If you would like to email me with your explanation... Mayalld ( talk) 08:34, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
WP:HYPHEN says "A hyphen is not used after a standard -ly adverb (a newly available home, a wholly owned subsidiary) unless part of a larger compound". That part of the guideline is completely clear. Please do not revert changes that I or other editors make to bring articles into compliance with it. Chris the speller yack 23:34, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing that, I saw it a few weeks ago, meant to fix it and it slipped my mind!-- Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 10:33, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi you reverted by edit to the suppressor === Real-world data === section on the following basis
(Removing welrod as it is a highly specialized gimick gun whereas the de lesile is signifiantly more common. The example was good to begin with. No need for a laundry list or a 'top 10' list.)
The Wellrod had around 2800 built The De Lisle carbines around 130
The Wellrod has continued in use, where as the de lisle stopped in the Korean War.
Would like to put it back thx RonaldDuncan ( talk) 10:57, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Blow_forward needs a serious cleanup: the images don't explain what the difference is (they all show the same). Also, the SIG AK52 WAS a blow-forward! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.160.47.242 ( talk) 14:57, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
I noticed your recent edit of subject article and your response to subsequent edits. I suggest you review Wikipedia:Verifiability. I have no doubt the information you provided can be verified, and would be happy to help you with the appropriate inline citation formatting if you wish. Where did you find the information about the relationship between the two models and the production total for the replacement model? Thewellman ( talk) 20:08, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
<ref name=rsa>{{cite journal |last=Marcot |first=Roy |year=2007 |title=Remington Model 29 Shotguns |journal=RSA Journal |volume= |issue=3rd Quarter |pages= |publisher=Remington Society of America }}</ref>
Alright then, its just that it has a similar operation if you read the patent. Howabout moving it to the discussion page? Uiyugr 02:41AM, 27/04/2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the correction on MOS for trademarks. I knew there was something on it, but I couldn't remember what the convention was (and apparently wasn't searching well). I'll keep it in mind! Regards, Appable ( talk | contributions) 04:02, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)