Overall, the article writes in a clear manner that makes it easy for the reader to comprehend. The guiding questions used in your research journey are very strong and prompting. Answering the posed questions will surely make a stronger Wikipedia page. I like the idea of adding in reliable sources that contribute to answering the "why" question. This would offer a deeper understanding of the cultural significance of the Pali Text Society. Firstly, I believe it would be helpful if an image of the transcripts on the palm leaves. There is a lot of imagery when describing the condition of the palm-leaf manuscripts . Adding an image would limit the different interpretations and create a clear visualization of the religious manuscripts. To suggest an area of improvement, it would be helpful if there was more information about what the content of the Pali text is. The ideas behind the content and the process that contributed to its conclusions would offer a general knowledge overview. This would also allow a thorough understanding on the cultural significance of the Pali Text Society. It Additionally, another way the article could be improved is by adding reliable sources. Currently, the article is densely packed with information, though it had 6 sources in the references section (some are not properly cited). This is very important, as the information presented should be valid. A great way I found more credible sources when editing my page was looking through the references of articles that have ben hot linked. This allowed for a focused and direct search.
 | Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional ResourcesCheck out the Editing Wikipedia PDF for general editing tips and suggestions. |
General info
- Whose work are you reviewing?
(provide username)
- Link to draft you're reviewing
- Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)
Overall, the article writes in a clear manner that makes it easy for the reader to comprehend. The guiding questions used in your research journey are very strong and prompting. Answering the posed questions will surely make a stronger Wikipedia page. I like the idea of adding in reliable sources that contribute to answering the "why" question. This would offer a deeper understanding of the cultural significance of the Pali Text Society. Firstly, I believe it would be helpful if an image of the transcripts on the palm leaves. There is a lot of imagery when describing the condition of the palm-leaf manuscripts . Adding an image would limit the different interpretations and create a clear visualization of the religious manuscripts. To suggest an area of improvement, it would be helpful if there was more information about what the content of the Pali text is. The ideas behind the content and the process that contributed to its conclusions would offer a general knowledge overview. This would also allow a thorough understanding on the cultural significance of the Pali Text Society. It Additionally, another way the article could be improved is by adding reliable sources. Currently, the article is densely packed with information, though it had 6 sources in the references section (some are not properly cited). This is very important, as the information presented should be valid. A great way I found more credible sources when editing my page was looking through the references of articles that have ben hot linked. This allowed for a focused and direct search.
| Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional ResourcesCheck out the Editing Wikipedia PDF for general editing tips and suggestions. |
General info
- Whose work are you reviewing?
(provide username)
- Link to draft you're reviewing
- Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)