From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Inequality and Social Disruption

The ability to enhance one's self or their child would reflect the overall goal of human life: to improve fitness and survivability. It is in human nature to want to better ourselves via increase life expectancy, become stronger and/or smarter, become less fearful and more independent. [1] In today’s world, however, there are stratification among socioeconomic classes that prevent some from accessing these enhancements. The advantage gained by one person’s enhancements implies a disadvantage to an unenhanced person. [2] Human enhancements present a great debate on the equality between the haves and the have-nots. A modern day example of this would be LASIK eye surgery, which only the wealthy can afford. It is important to mention that the gap between the haves and have-nots should not be completely closed. A gap between socioeconomic classes provides incentive for innovations and the desire to move up in the economic ladder. [3] Competition between classes allows people to strive to improve their own lives.

The enhancement of the human body could have profound changes to everyday situations. Sports, for instance, would change dramatically if enhanced people were allowed to compete; there would be a clear disadvantage for those who are not enhanced. [2] In regards to economic programs, human enhancements would greatly increase life expectancy which would require employers to either adjust their pension programs to compensate for a longer retirement term, or delay retirement age another ten years or so. When considering birth rates into this equation, if there is no decline with increased longevity, this could put more pressure on resources like energy and food availability. A job candidate enhanced with a neural transplant that heightens their ability to compute and retain information, would outcompete someone who is not enhanced. Another scenario might be a person with a hearing or sight enhancement could intrude on privacy laws or expectations in an environment like a classroom or workplace. These enhancements could go undetected and give individuals an overall advantage. Human enhancements have profound ability to benefit fitness and survivability; but at too high of a cost, enhancements could widen the gap between socioeconomic classes.


Reference

  1. ^ Berry, Roberta (July 2010). "A polemic for human enhancement". Metascience. 19 (2). Springer Netherlands: 263-266. doi: 10.1007/s11016-010-9361-z. ISSN  1467-9981. S2CID  170943478. Retrieved 7 November 2013.{{ cite journal}}: CS1 maint: date and year ( link)
  2. ^ a b Allhoff, Fritz; Lin, Patrick; Steinberg, Jesse (2011). "Ethics of Human Enhancement: An Executive Summary". Science and Engineering Ethics. 17 (2). Springer Netherlands: 201-212. doi: 10.1007/s11948-009-9191-9. ISSN  1471-5546. PMID  20094921. S2CID  11143329. Retrieved 7 November 2013. {{ cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored ( help)CS1 maint: date and year ( link)
  3. ^ Lin, Patrick; Allhoff, Fritz (2008). "Untangling the Debate: The Ethics of Human Enhancement". NanoEthics. 2 (3). Springer Netherlands: 251-264. doi: 10.1007/s11569-008-0046-7. ISSN  1871-4765. S2CID  18817470. {{ cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored ( help)CS1 maint: date and year ( link)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Inequality and Social Disruption

The ability to enhance one's self or their child would reflect the overall goal of human life: to improve fitness and survivability. It is in human nature to want to better ourselves via increase life expectancy, become stronger and/or smarter, become less fearful and more independent. [1] In today’s world, however, there are stratification among socioeconomic classes that prevent some from accessing these enhancements. The advantage gained by one person’s enhancements implies a disadvantage to an unenhanced person. [2] Human enhancements present a great debate on the equality between the haves and the have-nots. A modern day example of this would be LASIK eye surgery, which only the wealthy can afford. It is important to mention that the gap between the haves and have-nots should not be completely closed. A gap between socioeconomic classes provides incentive for innovations and the desire to move up in the economic ladder. [3] Competition between classes allows people to strive to improve their own lives.

The enhancement of the human body could have profound changes to everyday situations. Sports, for instance, would change dramatically if enhanced people were allowed to compete; there would be a clear disadvantage for those who are not enhanced. [2] In regards to economic programs, human enhancements would greatly increase life expectancy which would require employers to either adjust their pension programs to compensate for a longer retirement term, or delay retirement age another ten years or so. When considering birth rates into this equation, if there is no decline with increased longevity, this could put more pressure on resources like energy and food availability. A job candidate enhanced with a neural transplant that heightens their ability to compute and retain information, would outcompete someone who is not enhanced. Another scenario might be a person with a hearing or sight enhancement could intrude on privacy laws or expectations in an environment like a classroom or workplace. These enhancements could go undetected and give individuals an overall advantage. Human enhancements have profound ability to benefit fitness and survivability; but at too high of a cost, enhancements could widen the gap between socioeconomic classes.


Reference

  1. ^ Berry, Roberta (July 2010). "A polemic for human enhancement". Metascience. 19 (2). Springer Netherlands: 263-266. doi: 10.1007/s11016-010-9361-z. ISSN  1467-9981. S2CID  170943478. Retrieved 7 November 2013.{{ cite journal}}: CS1 maint: date and year ( link)
  2. ^ a b Allhoff, Fritz; Lin, Patrick; Steinberg, Jesse (2011). "Ethics of Human Enhancement: An Executive Summary". Science and Engineering Ethics. 17 (2). Springer Netherlands: 201-212. doi: 10.1007/s11948-009-9191-9. ISSN  1471-5546. PMID  20094921. S2CID  11143329. Retrieved 7 November 2013. {{ cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored ( help)CS1 maint: date and year ( link)
  3. ^ Lin, Patrick; Allhoff, Fritz (2008). "Untangling the Debate: The Ethics of Human Enhancement". NanoEthics. 2 (3). Springer Netherlands: 251-264. doi: 10.1007/s11569-008-0046-7. ISSN  1871-4765. S2CID  18817470. {{ cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored ( help)CS1 maint: date and year ( link)

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook