![]() | Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional ResourcesCheck out the Editing Wikipedia PDF for general editing tips and suggestions. |
WISE Physics
This is a quite extensive edit, and overall it contains well written, relevant information. All sources appear to be reputable and verifiable. I think perhaps the section on Qubit is a little short, and I think it could either be expanded or potentially incorporated into another section, rather than meriting its own subheading. Overall this is very thorough work, and I did not notice much I would change. A final pass for grammatical correctness and clarity would probably be helpful, but overall this is a well done article.
![]() | Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional ResourcesCheck out the Editing Wikipedia PDF for general editing tips and suggestions. |
WISE Physics
This is a quite extensive edit, and overall it contains well written, relevant information. All sources appear to be reputable and verifiable. I think perhaps the section on Qubit is a little short, and I think it could either be expanded or potentially incorporated into another section, rather than meriting its own subheading. Overall this is very thorough work, and I did not notice much I would change. A final pass for grammatical correctness and clarity would probably be helpful, but overall this is a well done article.