Reason:
notability concerns, whilst not a hoax I'm not convinced it passes
WP:NFILMS as even though there's a wealth of mentions on
reliable sites they're little more than either marketing guff or part of an automated index, there's no critical appraisal of it and IMDb even lacks an entry for it.
Reason:
notability concerns, doubt this font actually is separately notable from its creator. Actual article itself is a mess of unnecessary details but doubt even with cleanup it'd be a viable article.
Reason:
notability concerns, whilst not a hoax I'm not convinced it passes
WP:NFILMS as even though there's a wealth of mentions on
reliable sites they're little more than either marketing guff or part of an automated index, there's no critical appraisal of it and IMDb even lacks an entry for it.
Reason:
notability concerns, doubt this font actually is separately notable from its creator. Actual article itself is a mess of unnecessary details but doubt even with cleanup it'd be a viable article.