![]() | This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current main page. |
You are the subject of a discussion at WP:ANI. Crafty ( talk) 05:39, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
This admin has a new baby (their first). That may adjust reaction time. Proofreader77 ( talk) 10:13, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the much-needed injection of humor. -- TS 11:30, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
The page is not an archive, it was not moved there, and was used exclusively by socks to attack others, socks that are now blocked indefinitely.— Dæ dαlus Contribs 02:32, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Sorry for the delay in responding. Part of it was because of Real Life(tm) chores -- like assembling some Ikea furniture for my wife -- & part of it was because I needed to think through my response.
Hello Datheisen. I saw your comment at ANI, which wikilinked this phrase. Our article on that topic seems to have no appropriate sense. What did you have in mind? EdJohnston ( talk) 18:14, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
I had removed the section I created because no one responded to it, but I guess I could keep it a bit longer and see if anybody wants to make a response. Momo san Gespräch 06:49, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
Just stopping by to wave ... my brain is way too fried to skim your beautiful long stretches of sense for an inspiration to comment ... so I'll just note you "music note" signature grace note.
I hadn't thought about it before, but perhaps I should be imagine your messages as being sung. (Smiling but not kidding.) Many happy arias to come. Cheers, miraculous one. (PS, I've upgraded my user and talk pages ... if you skim the top, you'll see a "musical" link - Take a listen, and let me know if you like that song... if you feel like wasting a moment or two.) Proofreader77 ( talk) 10:23, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi Datheisen, appreciate your comments on ANI, it's actually very complicated to figure out, there is alot of discussion on the talk page, and the article should remain stable until things are decided on there. Reading through it should enable you to figure out what the various editors' positions are, which should help with understanding any edits that were made before. Regards. Izzedine 09:27, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
I haven't removed the tag since I think it could use an infobox, some good sources, and maybe some work on the subsections/layout. I should probably get the motivation to stop complaining and start :) . Seriously though, thanks for grabbing that stuff. You definitely improved it. Cptnono ( talk) 03:40, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
I was just thinking I hadn't thought much about that music note in front of your signature (you may have illuminated it on your user page, but I've been and remain lazy at times) ...
... in any case, I was thinking (now that I'm thinking :-) ... that your long (carefully composed) speeches are perhaps a kind of aria.
So, given the license of New Year's ... here's something I'll think of as your theme song (unless/until you tell me otherwise. :-) Cheers. Proofreader77 ( interact) ~
Hi Datheisen. Thank you for taking the time to explain the editorial process to me. I hope to return the favor to a newb in the future ;)
Bkdanilo ( talk) 16:13, 13 January 2010 (UTC)Bkdanilo
After tolling up the votes in the revision proposals, it emerged that 5.4 had the most support, but elements of that support remained unclear, and various comments throughout the polls needed consideration.
A finalisation poll (intended, if possible, to be one last poll before finalising the CDA proposal) has been run to;
Hello Datheisen. My name is Ikip. I have been editing Wikipedia since October 2005. I have been a member of WP:Article Rescue Squadron since mid 2008. I helped create WP:Incubator I also strongly support, Wikipedia:Petition_against_IAR_abuse [4] here have a template I created, a small token of appreciation for your work:
![]() |
Be it known that Tstormcandy has signed the Petition against Ignore All Rules abuse. |
In fact, I am probably the most vocal critic of the 320 deletions 3 days ago. I appreciate you comments on BLP. Thanks. Ikip 09:35, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for your efforts. We are slowly succeeding, and momentum is starting to move in our favor. It is because of you that this positive movement is even possible. Always remember that.
Ikip 10:22, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
![]() | Hello Tstormcandy. You are receiving this notice because you have either supported or posted constructive suggestions during my recent self-nominated RFA, submitted on 18-01-2010. Please do spend a few minutes to read my comments on the nomination, and feel free to respond on the relevant talkpage for any further comments or questions. Thank you for participating. Regards. Rehman( +) 15:23, 25 January 2010 (UTC) |
Ikip 05:06, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
(refactored) Ikip 03:59, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi, Datheisen. Because you participated in Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Septemberboy009/Blades (band), you may be interested in Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Septemberboy009/Ayush Goyal. Cunard ( talk) 23:38, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for restarting the conversation at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incivility blocks, I really appreciate it. I've been doing other duties because I've been somewhat tired with the new baby, and I just haven't wanted to crawl back to a place where Giano decided to make an appearance and Bish (who I thought was a friend) calls me "prissy". - Tbsdy (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) talk 12:50, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Hey, don't fret. We've all made mistakes like that on the Wiki at somepoint. Sometimes you think that the edit isn't helping but in fact it is. I remember when I was just starting out, I made silly little errors that I could sometimes be lambasted for. When I noticed the Lavrinc article had been used twice, the ref name just came in handy! But you get the idea, and no offence taken. I'll apologise for not making it clear first time around! Regards. Cs-wolves (talk) 00:22, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
As other editors have pointed out, there has been several intentional moves in this request for comment:
The end result is that editors who support radical, disruptive change, control the conversation, and less involved editors think that they only have a narrow list of choices, and !vote to accept bitey proposals which will only further hurt wikipedia growth and bite newcomers. Compromise means that both sides give up something.
I would possibly support this proposal if it includes strong WP:BEFORE language, to help protect new editors contributions, as the Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people#WP:BEFORE proposal, which has 19 supports, advocates.
I would strongly encourage you to reconsider your position on this important proposal. Okip 12:33, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
My company's page was deleted. How can I make changes to that page to make it visible once again? Also, are there certain things I you would suggest I add to the content so that it doesn't get deleted again?
Thanks, and here is the link to my company's page
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Heavy_Construction_Systems_Specialists
—Preceding unsigned comment added by HCSS Software ( talk • contribs) 17:46, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Hello, this note is just to tell you that an RfC has begun regarding User:Chelo61. Since you may have been involved with this user, your input is appreciated. Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Chelo61. Thank you. Phearson ( talk) 19:16, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. — DoRD ( talk) 15:56, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
You reverted my edit to the lead of Deshastha Brahmin AND the table I deleted from that article. Please take a look at the revision history and you will find the reasons for my action. Please undo the revert. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zuggernaut ( talk • contribs) 05:07, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
There's a discussion over at ANI on a user. I would appreciate your input. You were one of the editors participating in the previous discussion, and I'm currently informing all the editors involved-- hkr (talk) 11:20, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
My name is Sara Marks and I am doing research for a masters thesis at Fitchburg State University. My thesis has to do with resolving conflicts on Wikipedia entries and I am focusing on what happened to the Paul Revere entry after Palin's comments last summer. I have been going through the archives and would really like to talk to you about what happened after her comments, especially your part in it. I want to get a better idea of what happened and your thoughts on the resolution process. You can get back to me on your talk page, my talk page or via email at librarygurl at gmail.com. I can also answer any questions you may have about my thesis. I look forward to hearing from you. -- LibraryGurl ( talk) 19:44, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Please read this notification carefully:
A
community discussion has authorised the use of
general sanctions for pages related to the
Gamergate controversy.
The details of these sanctions are described
here.
General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. Dreadstar ☥ 05:18, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current main page. |
You are the subject of a discussion at WP:ANI. Crafty ( talk) 05:39, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
This admin has a new baby (their first). That may adjust reaction time. Proofreader77 ( talk) 10:13, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the much-needed injection of humor. -- TS 11:30, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
The page is not an archive, it was not moved there, and was used exclusively by socks to attack others, socks that are now blocked indefinitely.— Dæ dαlus Contribs 02:32, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Sorry for the delay in responding. Part of it was because of Real Life(tm) chores -- like assembling some Ikea furniture for my wife -- & part of it was because I needed to think through my response.
Hello Datheisen. I saw your comment at ANI, which wikilinked this phrase. Our article on that topic seems to have no appropriate sense. What did you have in mind? EdJohnston ( talk) 18:14, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
I had removed the section I created because no one responded to it, but I guess I could keep it a bit longer and see if anybody wants to make a response. Momo san Gespräch 06:49, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
Just stopping by to wave ... my brain is way too fried to skim your beautiful long stretches of sense for an inspiration to comment ... so I'll just note you "music note" signature grace note.
I hadn't thought about it before, but perhaps I should be imagine your messages as being sung. (Smiling but not kidding.) Many happy arias to come. Cheers, miraculous one. (PS, I've upgraded my user and talk pages ... if you skim the top, you'll see a "musical" link - Take a listen, and let me know if you like that song... if you feel like wasting a moment or two.) Proofreader77 ( talk) 10:23, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi Datheisen, appreciate your comments on ANI, it's actually very complicated to figure out, there is alot of discussion on the talk page, and the article should remain stable until things are decided on there. Reading through it should enable you to figure out what the various editors' positions are, which should help with understanding any edits that were made before. Regards. Izzedine 09:27, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
I haven't removed the tag since I think it could use an infobox, some good sources, and maybe some work on the subsections/layout. I should probably get the motivation to stop complaining and start :) . Seriously though, thanks for grabbing that stuff. You definitely improved it. Cptnono ( talk) 03:40, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
I was just thinking I hadn't thought much about that music note in front of your signature (you may have illuminated it on your user page, but I've been and remain lazy at times) ...
... in any case, I was thinking (now that I'm thinking :-) ... that your long (carefully composed) speeches are perhaps a kind of aria.
So, given the license of New Year's ... here's something I'll think of as your theme song (unless/until you tell me otherwise. :-) Cheers. Proofreader77 ( interact) ~
Hi Datheisen. Thank you for taking the time to explain the editorial process to me. I hope to return the favor to a newb in the future ;)
Bkdanilo ( talk) 16:13, 13 January 2010 (UTC)Bkdanilo
After tolling up the votes in the revision proposals, it emerged that 5.4 had the most support, but elements of that support remained unclear, and various comments throughout the polls needed consideration.
A finalisation poll (intended, if possible, to be one last poll before finalising the CDA proposal) has been run to;
Hello Datheisen. My name is Ikip. I have been editing Wikipedia since October 2005. I have been a member of WP:Article Rescue Squadron since mid 2008. I helped create WP:Incubator I also strongly support, Wikipedia:Petition_against_IAR_abuse [4] here have a template I created, a small token of appreciation for your work:
![]() |
Be it known that Tstormcandy has signed the Petition against Ignore All Rules abuse. |
In fact, I am probably the most vocal critic of the 320 deletions 3 days ago. I appreciate you comments on BLP. Thanks. Ikip 09:35, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for your efforts. We are slowly succeeding, and momentum is starting to move in our favor. It is because of you that this positive movement is even possible. Always remember that.
Ikip 10:22, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
![]() | Hello Tstormcandy. You are receiving this notice because you have either supported or posted constructive suggestions during my recent self-nominated RFA, submitted on 18-01-2010. Please do spend a few minutes to read my comments on the nomination, and feel free to respond on the relevant talkpage for any further comments or questions. Thank you for participating. Regards. Rehman( +) 15:23, 25 January 2010 (UTC) |
Ikip 05:06, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
(refactored) Ikip 03:59, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi, Datheisen. Because you participated in Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Septemberboy009/Blades (band), you may be interested in Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Septemberboy009/Ayush Goyal. Cunard ( talk) 23:38, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for restarting the conversation at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incivility blocks, I really appreciate it. I've been doing other duties because I've been somewhat tired with the new baby, and I just haven't wanted to crawl back to a place where Giano decided to make an appearance and Bish (who I thought was a friend) calls me "prissy". - Tbsdy (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) talk 12:50, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Hey, don't fret. We've all made mistakes like that on the Wiki at somepoint. Sometimes you think that the edit isn't helping but in fact it is. I remember when I was just starting out, I made silly little errors that I could sometimes be lambasted for. When I noticed the Lavrinc article had been used twice, the ref name just came in handy! But you get the idea, and no offence taken. I'll apologise for not making it clear first time around! Regards. Cs-wolves (talk) 00:22, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
As other editors have pointed out, there has been several intentional moves in this request for comment:
The end result is that editors who support radical, disruptive change, control the conversation, and less involved editors think that they only have a narrow list of choices, and !vote to accept bitey proposals which will only further hurt wikipedia growth and bite newcomers. Compromise means that both sides give up something.
I would possibly support this proposal if it includes strong WP:BEFORE language, to help protect new editors contributions, as the Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people#WP:BEFORE proposal, which has 19 supports, advocates.
I would strongly encourage you to reconsider your position on this important proposal. Okip 12:33, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
My company's page was deleted. How can I make changes to that page to make it visible once again? Also, are there certain things I you would suggest I add to the content so that it doesn't get deleted again?
Thanks, and here is the link to my company's page
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Heavy_Construction_Systems_Specialists
—Preceding unsigned comment added by HCSS Software ( talk • contribs) 17:46, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Hello, this note is just to tell you that an RfC has begun regarding User:Chelo61. Since you may have been involved with this user, your input is appreciated. Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Chelo61. Thank you. Phearson ( talk) 19:16, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. — DoRD ( talk) 15:56, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
You reverted my edit to the lead of Deshastha Brahmin AND the table I deleted from that article. Please take a look at the revision history and you will find the reasons for my action. Please undo the revert. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zuggernaut ( talk • contribs) 05:07, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
There's a discussion over at ANI on a user. I would appreciate your input. You were one of the editors participating in the previous discussion, and I'm currently informing all the editors involved-- hkr (talk) 11:20, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
My name is Sara Marks and I am doing research for a masters thesis at Fitchburg State University. My thesis has to do with resolving conflicts on Wikipedia entries and I am focusing on what happened to the Paul Revere entry after Palin's comments last summer. I have been going through the archives and would really like to talk to you about what happened after her comments, especially your part in it. I want to get a better idea of what happened and your thoughts on the resolution process. You can get back to me on your talk page, my talk page or via email at librarygurl at gmail.com. I can also answer any questions you may have about my thesis. I look forward to hearing from you. -- LibraryGurl ( talk) 19:44, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Please read this notification carefully:
A
community discussion has authorised the use of
general sanctions for pages related to the
Gamergate controversy.
The details of these sanctions are described
here.
General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. Dreadstar ☥ 05:18, 2 November 2014 (UTC)