Reason: The only two references on the article simply state that this person exists and do not offer any notability. I originally requested this be deleted via
WP:PROD which was disputed with a claim that he is notable simply because of his position in his company. It is hard for me to believe that this wiki offers blanket auto-exemptions for allowing a page to exist with a lack of reliable resources, especially in regards to the biography of a living person.
Reason: Originally tagged as {{db-corp}} which was removed by
Phil Bridger (
talk·contribs) claiming that "this is full of indications of importance/significance." I have re-reviewed the article and there are no reliable sources to back up that claim. The only sources listed on the page are sources to the organizations own sites. This article has been tagged {{Refimprove}} since Feb, 2011 and no attempts have been made to do so. There is simply no evidence of notability.
Reason: This article should be deleted because it reads like a movie theatre poster and fails to meet
WP:MOVIE. I nominated it for CSD, that was contested and the tag removed. I nominated it for PROD with "Reads like a movie theatre poster and fails to meet
WP:MOVIE." as the rationale and the person that removed the CSD tag added {{Prod2}}. The article creator then removed the PROD and PROD2 tags. That is the history, the article is still exactly the same as when I marked it for CSD, it still reads as a theatre poster advertisement and it still does not pass
notability requirements.
Reason: This article should be deleted because it reads like a movie theatre poster and fails to meet
WP:MOVIE. I nominated it for CSD, that was contested and the tag removed. I nominated it for PROD with "Reads like a movie theatre poster and fails to meet
WP:MOVIE." as the rationale and the person that removed the CSD tag added {{Prod2}}. The article creator then removed the PROD and PROD2 tags. That is the history, the article is still exactly the same as when I marked it for CSD, it still reads as a theatre poster advertisement and it still does not pass
notability requirements.
Reason: There is
one actual transclusion of this template and it has been sitting there unanswered for four years. I believe this template has been superseded by {{Help me}} and is no longer needed.
Reason: This falls under
WP:NOTNEWS and
WP:FUTURE at very least. Also, most of the sources are based on Twitter, blogs, and interviews of the involved parties.
Reason: Entirely unsourced BLP with no content except for a list of links to other people with articles this person has allegedly performed or recorded with. The article seems to claim that this person is notable based on who they've been claimed to have recorded with, but fails WP:NOTINHERITED and WP:NMUSIC.
Reason: The only two references on the article simply state that this person exists and do not offer any notability. I originally requested this be deleted via
WP:PROD which was disputed with a claim that he is notable simply because of his position in his company. It is hard for me to believe that this wiki offers blanket auto-exemptions for allowing a page to exist with a lack of reliable resources, especially in regards to the biography of a living person.
Reason: Originally tagged as {{db-corp}} which was removed by
Phil Bridger (
talk·contribs) claiming that "this is full of indications of importance/significance." I have re-reviewed the article and there are no reliable sources to back up that claim. The only sources listed on the page are sources to the organizations own sites. This article has been tagged {{Refimprove}} since Feb, 2011 and no attempts have been made to do so. There is simply no evidence of notability.
Reason: This article should be deleted because it reads like a movie theatre poster and fails to meet
WP:MOVIE. I nominated it for CSD, that was contested and the tag removed. I nominated it for PROD with "Reads like a movie theatre poster and fails to meet
WP:MOVIE." as the rationale and the person that removed the CSD tag added {{Prod2}}. The article creator then removed the PROD and PROD2 tags. That is the history, the article is still exactly the same as when I marked it for CSD, it still reads as a theatre poster advertisement and it still does not pass
notability requirements.
Reason: This article should be deleted because it reads like a movie theatre poster and fails to meet
WP:MOVIE. I nominated it for CSD, that was contested and the tag removed. I nominated it for PROD with "Reads like a movie theatre poster and fails to meet
WP:MOVIE." as the rationale and the person that removed the CSD tag added {{Prod2}}. The article creator then removed the PROD and PROD2 tags. That is the history, the article is still exactly the same as when I marked it for CSD, it still reads as a theatre poster advertisement and it still does not pass
notability requirements.
Reason: There is
one actual transclusion of this template and it has been sitting there unanswered for four years. I believe this template has been superseded by {{Help me}} and is no longer needed.
Reason: This falls under
WP:NOTNEWS and
WP:FUTURE at very least. Also, most of the sources are based on Twitter, blogs, and interviews of the involved parties.
Reason: Entirely unsourced BLP with no content except for a list of links to other people with articles this person has allegedly performed or recorded with. The article seems to claim that this person is notable based on who they've been claimed to have recorded with, but fails WP:NOTINHERITED and WP:NMUSIC.