From the looks of things the citations look good. I think my only critique of this page is amount of content; however, you're probably in the middle of getting more sources and information.
-Wes
Bibliography
As you gather the sources for your Wikipedia contribution, think about the following:
Reliable publications include established newspapers, academic journals and books, textbooks, and other published sources with reputations for accuracy and fact-checking.
Unreliable sources include blog posts and other self-published works, press releases, and social media posts.
In order for a source to be considered verifiable, other editors should be able to consult the source.
Is the source independent of the subject?
Is the source connected in any way to the subject? This is especially important when writing biographies or about organizations.
For example, if you were writing a biography, sources like the person's webpage or personal blog would not be considered independent.
Is the source primary or secondary?
Primary sources include first-hand accounts, autobiographies, and other original content.
Wikipedia allows limited use of primary sources, but typically only for straightforward, descriptive statements of facts, and only if they are published and verifiable without requiring specialized knowledge.
Secondary sources should be the main basis for a biography on Wikipedia.
If you're working on a topic related to medicine or psychology, ensure that your sources follow
these special guidelines.
If you're creating a new article, consider the following:
Ensure that your topic meets Wikipedia's
notability guidelines.
In order for a topic to meet the notability requirement, you must be able to identify 2-3 sources that are reliable, verifiable, and independent of the subject you're writing about.
Finding sufficient sources to establish notability can be especially hard when writing about people or organizations.
Sources that are not independent of the subject might be useful additions, but don't count towards the notability requirement.
Wikipedia has developed special guidelines for writing about
living persons. Please follow these carefully.
Wikipedia has a series of
guidelines for writing about different categories of people, such as academics and artists. If you're trying to create a new entry about a living person, please look at these carefully.
If you're not sure whether a source is reliable, ask a librarian! If you have questions about Wikipedia's sourcing rules, you can use the Get Help button below to contact your Wikipedia Expert.
Paskevich, Ivan Fedorovich, svetleĭshiĭ kni︠a︡zʹ Varshavskiĭ (2019). Notes of the 1812 campaign. Jimmy Chen. [United Kingdom].
ISBN978-1-7016-3269-1.
OCLC 1286629292.[1]
Lieven, D. C. B. (2010). Russia against Napoleon : the battle for Europe, 1807 to 1814. London: Penguin Books.
ISBN978-1-101-42938-9.
OCLC 1142685442.[2]
Mikaberidze, Alexander (2022). Kutuzov : a life in war and peace. New York, NY.
ISBN978-0-19-754676-5.
OCLC 1269616690.[3]
King, Charles (2008). The ghost of freedom : a history of the Caucasus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
ISBN978-0-19-517775-6.
OCLC 171614379.[4]
Bilenʹkyĭ, Serhiĭ. (2012). Romantic nationalism in Eastern Europe : Russian, Polish, and Ukrainian political imaginations. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
ISBN978-0-8047-8056-8.
OCLC 787852735.
Nowak, Andrzej (2008). History and geopolitics : a contest for Eastern Europe. Warsaw: Polish Institute of International Affairs.
ISBN978-83-89607-28-7.
OCLC 243603134.[5]
Barratt, Glynn R. (1972). "A Note on the Russian Conquest of Armenia (1827)". The Slavonic and East European Review. 50 (120): 386–409.
ISSN 0037-6795.[6]
From the looks of things the citations look good. I think my only critique of this page is amount of content; however, you're probably in the middle of getting more sources and information.
-Wes
Bibliography
As you gather the sources for your Wikipedia contribution, think about the following:
Reliable publications include established newspapers, academic journals and books, textbooks, and other published sources with reputations for accuracy and fact-checking.
Unreliable sources include blog posts and other self-published works, press releases, and social media posts.
In order for a source to be considered verifiable, other editors should be able to consult the source.
Is the source independent of the subject?
Is the source connected in any way to the subject? This is especially important when writing biographies or about organizations.
For example, if you were writing a biography, sources like the person's webpage or personal blog would not be considered independent.
Is the source primary or secondary?
Primary sources include first-hand accounts, autobiographies, and other original content.
Wikipedia allows limited use of primary sources, but typically only for straightforward, descriptive statements of facts, and only if they are published and verifiable without requiring specialized knowledge.
Secondary sources should be the main basis for a biography on Wikipedia.
If you're working on a topic related to medicine or psychology, ensure that your sources follow
these special guidelines.
If you're creating a new article, consider the following:
Ensure that your topic meets Wikipedia's
notability guidelines.
In order for a topic to meet the notability requirement, you must be able to identify 2-3 sources that are reliable, verifiable, and independent of the subject you're writing about.
Finding sufficient sources to establish notability can be especially hard when writing about people or organizations.
Sources that are not independent of the subject might be useful additions, but don't count towards the notability requirement.
Wikipedia has developed special guidelines for writing about
living persons. Please follow these carefully.
Wikipedia has a series of
guidelines for writing about different categories of people, such as academics and artists. If you're trying to create a new entry about a living person, please look at these carefully.
If you're not sure whether a source is reliable, ask a librarian! If you have questions about Wikipedia's sourcing rules, you can use the Get Help button below to contact your Wikipedia Expert.
Paskevich, Ivan Fedorovich, svetleĭshiĭ kni︠a︡zʹ Varshavskiĭ (2019). Notes of the 1812 campaign. Jimmy Chen. [United Kingdom].
ISBN978-1-7016-3269-1.
OCLC 1286629292.[1]
Lieven, D. C. B. (2010). Russia against Napoleon : the battle for Europe, 1807 to 1814. London: Penguin Books.
ISBN978-1-101-42938-9.
OCLC 1142685442.[2]
Mikaberidze, Alexander (2022). Kutuzov : a life in war and peace. New York, NY.
ISBN978-0-19-754676-5.
OCLC 1269616690.[3]
King, Charles (2008). The ghost of freedom : a history of the Caucasus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
ISBN978-0-19-517775-6.
OCLC 171614379.[4]
Bilenʹkyĭ, Serhiĭ. (2012). Romantic nationalism in Eastern Europe : Russian, Polish, and Ukrainian political imaginations. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
ISBN978-0-8047-8056-8.
OCLC 787852735.
Nowak, Andrzej (2008). History and geopolitics : a contest for Eastern Europe. Warsaw: Polish Institute of International Affairs.
ISBN978-83-89607-28-7.
OCLC 243603134.[5]
Barratt, Glynn R. (1972). "A Note on the Russian Conquest of Armenia (1827)". The Slavonic and East European Review. 50 (120): 386–409.
ISSN 0037-6795.[6]