 | Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional ResourcesCheck out the Editing Wikipedia PDF for general editing tips and suggestions. |
General info
- Whose work are you reviewing?
Srivera6
- Link to draft you're reviewing
- User:Srivera6/Behavior informatics
- Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
- Behavior informatics
Evaluate the drafted changes
Your article topic seems really interesting! Your lead so far does well of defining the topic. Because the article does not have much information yet, you could consider discussing the different aspects of behavioral science in relation to BI since it is present in the lead. As pointed out, you may want to reword the last sentence of your draft or add a citation in order to maintain neutrality. if you do decided to keep this, you could potentially add the universities and their and some of their research to the body of the article if possible. Based on the currently published article, it could be interesting to expand on the behavior and behavior analytics sections and further define them, or look at why BI is important or helpful to psychology or certain groups of people. The sources so far seem up-to-date and relevant to the topic, which could help the verification of the article. There seems to be a lot of room for expanding in this article, so I feel like you could take it in many directions!
| Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional ResourcesCheck out the Editing Wikipedia PDF for general editing tips and suggestions. |
General info
- Whose work are you reviewing?
Srivera6
- Link to draft you're reviewing
- User:Srivera6/Behavior informatics
- Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
- Behavior informatics
Evaluate the drafted changes
Your article topic seems really interesting! Your lead so far does well of defining the topic. Because the article does not have much information yet, you could consider discussing the different aspects of behavioral science in relation to BI since it is present in the lead. As pointed out, you may want to reword the last sentence of your draft or add a citation in order to maintain neutrality. if you do decided to keep this, you could potentially add the universities and their and some of their research to the body of the article if possible. Based on the currently published article, it could be interesting to expand on the behavior and behavior analytics sections and further define them, or look at why BI is important or helpful to psychology or certain groups of people. The sources so far seem up-to-date and relevant to the topic, which could help the verification of the article. There seems to be a lot of room for expanding in this article, so I feel like you could take it in many directions!