Hi. I'm not going to place an official warning template here, but I will make one final appeal to your better judgement. You have not taken your previous block on board, and you continue to demonstrate a clear lack of maturity for collaborating on Wikipedia. Other admins have been very generous with you, so please understand that this has gone far enough, and if you don't calm down, you will be blocked indefinitely. Try do do some useful work here and understand that this is not FaceBook, a blog, or a forum, as I have told you before. -- Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 13:22, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
As I suppose you're unaware, Mahboob is a relatively common Urdu given name. So you've informed this user that his likely actual name is obscene. Please be more careful in the future. -- Danger ( talk) 14:59, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
Please don't place your observations inside someone's unblock request as you did here. Thanks — DoRD ( talk) 00:50, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Based on your editing patterns that continued in the last day, I have found no option but to block you for lacking the competence required to edit Wikipedia. Your actions in disputes with other users, inappropriate user name warnings, and inappropriate "non-admin observations" that have been pointed out on your talk page show this clearly. Your further edits in your own user space and others' shows you have not taken our warnings to focus solely on improving the project to heart. I highly suggest taking time away from Wikipedia to mature and then maybe coming back once you fully understand Wikipedia policies and how you can best contribute. I think that if you are to be unblocked, a mentorship program needs to be put in place...I will not agree to an unblock unless one is instituted (of course, other admins can certainly disagree and unblock, but I think it would be unwise to unblock without one in place). As always, you can request unblock through {{unblock|your reason here}}. Please take the words of everyone who's warned you to heart. only ( talk) 00:58, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Spidey665 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Truly enough, mentorship is required. I will never make a sock puppet, and I was going to take a two week wikibreak anyways. If so, please shorten my block to two weeks. Spidey 665 10:48, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
The odds of this problem resolving itself in two weeks seem slim. A better solution would be to come back when you feel you understand the problem and have matured enoungh to make a convincing request. Setting an automatic date for that does not appear to be a good idea. Kuru (talk) 13:48, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Please remove this awful format from your talk page, Because you completely fail to accept advice and learn from the many warnings you have been given, I do not consider you to have the required level of maturity to be trusted to anything at all on Wikipedia. I further do not believe that any amount of mentoring will elevate your maturity to the right level. We can certainly, and willingly, show you how to use Wikipedia, but it is not our job to make you grow up, behave like a mature individual, and accept responsibility for what you do here. Sorry, but do come back in a couple of year when you are older. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 11:08, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
I am not quite doing it for that reason. Besides, you made a deal about solid mentorship. Let's start. I understand the situation. Spidey 665 23:41, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Thankyou for participating in my request for adminship. Now I've got lots of extra buttons to try and avoid pressing by mistake... Redrose64 ( talk) 15:11, 14 October 2011 (UTC) |
Spidey665 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I would like to come back to Wikipedia, simply because I can edit more and possibly help contribute to the encyclopedia. I also know what is vandalism and what is not. I also realized that IPs are not all bad. If you could unblock me, that'd be great, please and thanks. Spidey 665 5:19 am, Today (UTC+7)
Decline reason:
You have not addressed the block reasons or agreed to mentorship. A lack of competence is often a clear sign of lack of maturity. We can show you how to use Wikipedia, be we cannot teach you to adopt an adult level of responsibility for what you do here. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 02:51, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Spidey665 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I would like to come back to Wikipedia, as some false information I have seen on stubs. I will edit with maturity, competence and thoughtfulness. As I was not being thoughtful of what I have done, thinking of my so-called "anti-vandalism" edits, some were not vandalism. Just this one chance, please? Thanks. And I will agree to mentorship. Spidey 665 21:20, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Since you're continuing to evade your block by editing without logging in: no. -- jpgordon ::==( o ) 22:03, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I won't evade anymore, there were simply some things I had to fix on pages. Spidey 665 22:05, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
Delete my userpage, subpages, hide them, and hide all of my contributions so I can fuck off and make Kudpung happy. Spidey 665 21:31, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
I will mentor the user if he wishes. → Σ τ c. 02:26, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Σ, please do so. Spidey 665 23:15, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Spidey665 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
A mentorship has officially been put in place with Sigma and I. We have reviewed all the rules and I have found thirteen examples of vandalism on Wikipedia with my mentor. We have also spoken about templates, what is not vandalism. May I please be unblocked? Spidey 665 04:33, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I've spent quite a while pondering over this, and had an IRC conversation with Σ to help clarify the situation. Unfortunately, at this point in time, I am not persuaded that your judgement is sufficiently up to the standards expected of a wikipedia editor. I do not doubt your intentions, nor Σ's, but I am perturbed by the over-reaction to comments on this talk page, which could have been nicer but were certainly mild compared to what you will have to face as a vandal fighter. I'd suggest at this point in time that either Σ starts mentorship on this page, or that you prove that you can edit productively on another one of the WMF projects. I am willing to revist this in the future. WormTT · ( talk) 10:03, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
importScript("User:Σ/Testing facility/Talkreminder.js");
in his common.js. →
Σ
τ
c.
06:43, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
BTW: Please do not refactor my comments to turn them into uncivil statements that I have not made - what you have done is yet another reason not to unblock you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 07:10, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
This is vandalism. Revert it. Spidey 665 23:26, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
I've revoked your Talk page access as you were continuing to accuse other people of personal attacks - the inability to distinguish between forthright talking and personal attack is one of the issues you need to address before you edit any further here. If you wish to make any further requests for unblock, you will now need to email unblock-en-llists.wikimedia.org -- Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 20:41, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
No, I am beginning to realize he are here to educate me. Although he is a bit blunt, he is a great sysop. Spidey 665 22:14, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
The Special Barnstar | |
Kudpung, I owe you a barnstar for being a great educator. I should have listened to what you said, but I was to stupid to listen. I'm very sorry. Spidey 665 22:19, 29 November 2011 (UTC) |
Great - what you need to do know is to address the block reasons so something great can happen to your account :) -- Bryce ( talk | contribs) 01:05, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
If this is genuine (and I'm willing to believe it is), you're on the right track. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい) 04:48, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
The siver lining | |
I can be a dark and stormy admin sometimes, but let me tell you something: You're in the best of hands here, because by pure coincidence the bunch of admins that have been watching over you are the best of friends and we have one thing in common: We're devoted to helping younger editors :)
BTW: many happy returns for your 18th! Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 09:34, 30 November 2011 (UTC) |
Spidey665 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I think that I have learned my lesson (especially from Kudpung, Σ, Boing!, Worm and Bryce) while being blocked. I think that blocking me for my immaturity, utter stupidity and lack of competence at that time was the best option ever. As being eighteen years of age now, I am beginning to realize that I am not a child, and that my immature days are over. Thank you for listening to my words. Spidey 665 21:54, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I hate to sound legalistic, but I'm going to use jurisprudence from WP:OFFER. As part of the Standard Offer, we advise editors to go away from English Wikipedia for a minimum of 6 months and go and be productive on another Wikimedia project before coming back and requesting unblock. You were only recently blocked on English Wikipedia. You were just blocked on Simple Wikipedia for competence issues. On the latter alone, you would fail the spirit of WP:OFFER. I will, however, re-extend the concept of WP:OFFER to you now - do not edit Wikipedia (even anonymously) for a minimum of 6 months. Find another Wikimedia project to work on, and be a productive editor there. Come back, prove that you were productive, and request unblock then. ( talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:02, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
(reset indent) Replying to you, Bryce, I think maybe we can easily use voting for an unblock, similar to RfAs. Spidey 665 21:08, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
Considering I JUST blocked Spidey on Simple Wikipedia not even two weeks ago for continuing to lack competence, there is absolutely no way I support any attempt to unblock here. only ( talk) 22:51, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
In your own words, please explain what Wikipedia is. → Σ τ c. 03:54, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Excellent, now can you describe the five pillars and two or three other important policies of your choice? → Σ τ c. 01:44, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
heres the deal if you want to be unblocked then you must behave and remember wikipedia is not like wikia and also please read the rules before you make a unblock request im just saying i am sorry for what happened to you -- AwesomeSponge ( talk) 12:48, 10 February 2012 (UTC) P.S. if you want unblocked then you may have to make an unblock request first if they denied the request then thats ok try again next time
Whoa.... how did this happen? In all honesty, I am not AwesomeSponge. I need help from a CU or admin to prove that I'm not him. I will even prove I'm not him, since I have CU access on my own wiki, where AwesomeSponge is. Spidey 665 21:10, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi. I'm not going to place an official warning template here, but I will make one final appeal to your better judgement. You have not taken your previous block on board, and you continue to demonstrate a clear lack of maturity for collaborating on Wikipedia. Other admins have been very generous with you, so please understand that this has gone far enough, and if you don't calm down, you will be blocked indefinitely. Try do do some useful work here and understand that this is not FaceBook, a blog, or a forum, as I have told you before. -- Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 13:22, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
As I suppose you're unaware, Mahboob is a relatively common Urdu given name. So you've informed this user that his likely actual name is obscene. Please be more careful in the future. -- Danger ( talk) 14:59, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
Please don't place your observations inside someone's unblock request as you did here. Thanks — DoRD ( talk) 00:50, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Based on your editing patterns that continued in the last day, I have found no option but to block you for lacking the competence required to edit Wikipedia. Your actions in disputes with other users, inappropriate user name warnings, and inappropriate "non-admin observations" that have been pointed out on your talk page show this clearly. Your further edits in your own user space and others' shows you have not taken our warnings to focus solely on improving the project to heart. I highly suggest taking time away from Wikipedia to mature and then maybe coming back once you fully understand Wikipedia policies and how you can best contribute. I think that if you are to be unblocked, a mentorship program needs to be put in place...I will not agree to an unblock unless one is instituted (of course, other admins can certainly disagree and unblock, but I think it would be unwise to unblock without one in place). As always, you can request unblock through {{unblock|your reason here}}. Please take the words of everyone who's warned you to heart. only ( talk) 00:58, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Spidey665 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Truly enough, mentorship is required. I will never make a sock puppet, and I was going to take a two week wikibreak anyways. If so, please shorten my block to two weeks. Spidey 665 10:48, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
The odds of this problem resolving itself in two weeks seem slim. A better solution would be to come back when you feel you understand the problem and have matured enoungh to make a convincing request. Setting an automatic date for that does not appear to be a good idea. Kuru (talk) 13:48, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Please remove this awful format from your talk page, Because you completely fail to accept advice and learn from the many warnings you have been given, I do not consider you to have the required level of maturity to be trusted to anything at all on Wikipedia. I further do not believe that any amount of mentoring will elevate your maturity to the right level. We can certainly, and willingly, show you how to use Wikipedia, but it is not our job to make you grow up, behave like a mature individual, and accept responsibility for what you do here. Sorry, but do come back in a couple of year when you are older. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 11:08, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
I am not quite doing it for that reason. Besides, you made a deal about solid mentorship. Let's start. I understand the situation. Spidey 665 23:41, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Thankyou for participating in my request for adminship. Now I've got lots of extra buttons to try and avoid pressing by mistake... Redrose64 ( talk) 15:11, 14 October 2011 (UTC) |
Spidey665 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I would like to come back to Wikipedia, simply because I can edit more and possibly help contribute to the encyclopedia. I also know what is vandalism and what is not. I also realized that IPs are not all bad. If you could unblock me, that'd be great, please and thanks. Spidey 665 5:19 am, Today (UTC+7)
Decline reason:
You have not addressed the block reasons or agreed to mentorship. A lack of competence is often a clear sign of lack of maturity. We can show you how to use Wikipedia, be we cannot teach you to adopt an adult level of responsibility for what you do here. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 02:51, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Spidey665 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I would like to come back to Wikipedia, as some false information I have seen on stubs. I will edit with maturity, competence and thoughtfulness. As I was not being thoughtful of what I have done, thinking of my so-called "anti-vandalism" edits, some were not vandalism. Just this one chance, please? Thanks. And I will agree to mentorship. Spidey 665 21:20, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Since you're continuing to evade your block by editing without logging in: no. -- jpgordon ::==( o ) 22:03, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I won't evade anymore, there were simply some things I had to fix on pages. Spidey 665 22:05, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
Delete my userpage, subpages, hide them, and hide all of my contributions so I can fuck off and make Kudpung happy. Spidey 665 21:31, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
I will mentor the user if he wishes. → Σ τ c. 02:26, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Σ, please do so. Spidey 665 23:15, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Spidey665 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
A mentorship has officially been put in place with Sigma and I. We have reviewed all the rules and I have found thirteen examples of vandalism on Wikipedia with my mentor. We have also spoken about templates, what is not vandalism. May I please be unblocked? Spidey 665 04:33, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I've spent quite a while pondering over this, and had an IRC conversation with Σ to help clarify the situation. Unfortunately, at this point in time, I am not persuaded that your judgement is sufficiently up to the standards expected of a wikipedia editor. I do not doubt your intentions, nor Σ's, but I am perturbed by the over-reaction to comments on this talk page, which could have been nicer but were certainly mild compared to what you will have to face as a vandal fighter. I'd suggest at this point in time that either Σ starts mentorship on this page, or that you prove that you can edit productively on another one of the WMF projects. I am willing to revist this in the future. WormTT · ( talk) 10:03, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
importScript("User:Σ/Testing facility/Talkreminder.js");
in his common.js. →
Σ
τ
c.
06:43, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
BTW: Please do not refactor my comments to turn them into uncivil statements that I have not made - what you have done is yet another reason not to unblock you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 07:10, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
This is vandalism. Revert it. Spidey 665 23:26, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
I've revoked your Talk page access as you were continuing to accuse other people of personal attacks - the inability to distinguish between forthright talking and personal attack is one of the issues you need to address before you edit any further here. If you wish to make any further requests for unblock, you will now need to email unblock-en-llists.wikimedia.org -- Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 20:41, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
No, I am beginning to realize he are here to educate me. Although he is a bit blunt, he is a great sysop. Spidey 665 22:14, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
The Special Barnstar | |
Kudpung, I owe you a barnstar for being a great educator. I should have listened to what you said, but I was to stupid to listen. I'm very sorry. Spidey 665 22:19, 29 November 2011 (UTC) |
Great - what you need to do know is to address the block reasons so something great can happen to your account :) -- Bryce ( talk | contribs) 01:05, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
If this is genuine (and I'm willing to believe it is), you're on the right track. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい) 04:48, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
The siver lining | |
I can be a dark and stormy admin sometimes, but let me tell you something: You're in the best of hands here, because by pure coincidence the bunch of admins that have been watching over you are the best of friends and we have one thing in common: We're devoted to helping younger editors :)
BTW: many happy returns for your 18th! Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 09:34, 30 November 2011 (UTC) |
Spidey665 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I think that I have learned my lesson (especially from Kudpung, Σ, Boing!, Worm and Bryce) while being blocked. I think that blocking me for my immaturity, utter stupidity and lack of competence at that time was the best option ever. As being eighteen years of age now, I am beginning to realize that I am not a child, and that my immature days are over. Thank you for listening to my words. Spidey 665 21:54, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I hate to sound legalistic, but I'm going to use jurisprudence from WP:OFFER. As part of the Standard Offer, we advise editors to go away from English Wikipedia for a minimum of 6 months and go and be productive on another Wikimedia project before coming back and requesting unblock. You were only recently blocked on English Wikipedia. You were just blocked on Simple Wikipedia for competence issues. On the latter alone, you would fail the spirit of WP:OFFER. I will, however, re-extend the concept of WP:OFFER to you now - do not edit Wikipedia (even anonymously) for a minimum of 6 months. Find another Wikimedia project to work on, and be a productive editor there. Come back, prove that you were productive, and request unblock then. ( talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:02, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
(reset indent) Replying to you, Bryce, I think maybe we can easily use voting for an unblock, similar to RfAs. Spidey 665 21:08, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
Considering I JUST blocked Spidey on Simple Wikipedia not even two weeks ago for continuing to lack competence, there is absolutely no way I support any attempt to unblock here. only ( talk) 22:51, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
In your own words, please explain what Wikipedia is. → Σ τ c. 03:54, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Excellent, now can you describe the five pillars and two or three other important policies of your choice? → Σ τ c. 01:44, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
heres the deal if you want to be unblocked then you must behave and remember wikipedia is not like wikia and also please read the rules before you make a unblock request im just saying i am sorry for what happened to you -- AwesomeSponge ( talk) 12:48, 10 February 2012 (UTC) P.S. if you want unblocked then you may have to make an unblock request first if they denied the request then thats ok try again next time
Whoa.... how did this happen? In all honesty, I am not AwesomeSponge. I need help from a CU or admin to prove that I'm not him. I will even prove I'm not him, since I have CU access on my own wiki, where AwesomeSponge is. Spidey 665 21:10, 7 March 2012 (UTC)