![]() | Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional Resources |
Sokmleopard
Overall Impressions
Good, compelling edits that do a good job of contributing to the body of knowledge and fleshing out the management section of the article while tying it back into the life cycle of the disease.
Lead
The first sentence is unnecessary and the overall edit could be more concise but it is overall great additions to the article.
Content
The content is significant and well-written and should be a part of the main article as it provides necessary context and information on the management of fusiform rust.
Tone and Balance
The tone is professional and informative but could be more concise.
Sources and References
Sources are provided alongside adequate citations.
Organization
The edits are organized in a logical manner that builds towards the overall message of managing fusiform until the pathogen hits a "dead-end".
Media
No media was needed or provided.
![]() | Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional Resources |
Sokmleopard
Overall Impressions
Good, compelling edits that do a good job of contributing to the body of knowledge and fleshing out the management section of the article while tying it back into the life cycle of the disease.
Lead
The first sentence is unnecessary and the overall edit could be more concise but it is overall great additions to the article.
Content
The content is significant and well-written and should be a part of the main article as it provides necessary context and information on the management of fusiform rust.
Tone and Balance
The tone is professional and informative but could be more concise.
Sources and References
Sources are provided alongside adequate citations.
Organization
The edits are organized in a logical manner that builds towards the overall message of managing fusiform until the pathogen hits a "dead-end".
Media
No media was needed or provided.