Opening: Van't Kruijs Opening
a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | ||
8 | 8 | ||||||||
7 | 7 | ||||||||
6 | 6 | ||||||||
5 | 5 | ||||||||
4 | 4 | ||||||||
3 | 3 | ||||||||
2 | 2 | ||||||||
1 | 1 | ||||||||
a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h |
1. e3 ... a6 2. Nc3 ... Nc6 3. d3 ... Nb4 4. a3 ... Nc6 5. Nd5 ... Ne5 6. Nc3 ... h6 7. d4 ... Ng6 8. Bd3 ... c6 9. Bf5 ... Ra7 10. Ra2 ... f6?? 11. Bxg6++ FLAWLESS VICTORY!
Interesting openings here! Dysprosia 01:32, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
For move 10, I know what move I would make if I were white :-X. H Padleckas 17:11, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
Mate in one. White to win. Linuxbeak | Desk 21:05, May 18, 2005 (UTC)
I was looking at this game after move 9 and I was thinking that white would go Qd3 to potentially set up a very similar mate. Unless black tooks steps to avoid, next white move would have Bxg6 gaining a knight. If black dared to take back with fxg6, then Qxg6 mate. As it turns out, although with different moves, the end was just as quick. H Padleckas 06:17, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
Opening: Van't Kruijs Opening
a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | ||
8 | 8 | ||||||||
7 | 7 | ||||||||
6 | 6 | ||||||||
5 | 5 | ||||||||
4 | 4 | ||||||||
3 | 3 | ||||||||
2 | 2 | ||||||||
1 | 1 | ||||||||
a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h |
1. e3 ... a6 2. Nc3 ... Nc6 3. d3 ... Nb4 4. a3 ... Nc6 5. Nd5 ... Ne5 6. Nc3 ... h6 7. d4 ... Ng6 8. Bd3 ... c6 9. Bf5 ... Ra7 10. Ra2 ... f6?? 11. Bxg6++ FLAWLESS VICTORY!
Interesting openings here! Dysprosia 01:32, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
For move 10, I know what move I would make if I were white :-X. H Padleckas 17:11, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
Mate in one. White to win. Linuxbeak | Desk 21:05, May 18, 2005 (UTC)
I was looking at this game after move 9 and I was thinking that white would go Qd3 to potentially set up a very similar mate. Unless black tooks steps to avoid, next white move would have Bxg6 gaining a knight. If black dared to take back with fxg6, then Qxg6 mate. As it turns out, although with different moves, the end was just as quick. H Padleckas 06:17, 19 May 2005 (UTC)