Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional Resources |
Seastandbymeblackeye
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)
Lead: this looks good; very concise.
Content: the plot summary is good so far but needs to be finished.
Tone and Balance: the tone is neutral and does not try to convince the reader of a particular viewpoint.
Sources and References: formatted nicely, and there are plenty of reliable sources.
Organization: the organization makes sense; there isn't anything I would change.
Overall, this is an informative and organized article. My main suggestion is to check the grammar and wording in the plot summary section, since there are places where the wording is confusing. The plot summary seems to be unfinished, but other than that there are no major issues. Great job!
Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional Resources |
Seastandbymeblackeye
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)
Lead: this looks good; very concise.
Content: the plot summary is good so far but needs to be finished.
Tone and Balance: the tone is neutral and does not try to convince the reader of a particular viewpoint.
Sources and References: formatted nicely, and there are plenty of reliable sources.
Organization: the organization makes sense; there isn't anything I would change.
Overall, this is an informative and organized article. My main suggestion is to check the grammar and wording in the plot summary section, since there are places where the wording is confusing. The plot summary seems to be unfinished, but other than that there are no major issues. Great job!