I am categorizing these FLs by six types. Please note that I only think the FLs in A, B or F should be delisted. The rest I am noting more for curiosities sake.
It's important to note that these are just the lists in which I see immediate problems. If a page is not listed here, it does not necessarily mean that I think it's perfectly fine (there are a lot of minor issues like small leads, improperly formatted references out there that weren't listed).
Feel free to add any list you think fits in with the types. However, please make sure you add your signature. I would appreciate it if users could avoid commenting on this page until I finish.
For the most part, the tallest buildings pages are a very well-maintained group of lists. A few minor issues here and there, like improperly formatted refs. I'm still not sure if List of tallest buildings and structures in Salford is notable and does List of tallest buildings in Portland, Oregon really need to have (Image) in ever row? Why not just incorporate the images into the table? In List of tallest buildings in Seattle, the least clearly states the the Space Needle is not ranked because it is not a building, yet it is included in the "Timeline of tallest buildings" section (I actually brought this up in the FLC and it was fixed, but I guess it's been reverted).
In regards to the episode lists, there seems to be no set standard, almost every one (especially the anime lists) uses a different type of formatting. That's not necessarily a bad thing, it just might help if things were more uniform.
A question: Does the band actually receive awards for videos? For example, if an artist won an MTV Video award for "Best editing", would the editor not be the one to receive the award and not the artist? So would it not be a mistake to include such awards in the list of awards won by that artist?
I am not going to include all of the "List of [team] first-round draft picks" lists here. I believe they are unnecessary forks, but some of them are long enough to not be Type As.
I'm not going to include them here, but most of the NHL trophy pages could use bigger leads and in some cases the refs need to be properly formatted. (It's worth noting that I did nominate several of them, so if anyone thinks I'm being too easy on them, let me know).
Just a general comment about the lists of counties, some of them need to be brought up to current standards. For example, List of counties in Arizona is of noticeable lesser quality than List of counties in Kentucky.
Generally a nice group of lists. I'm wondering if some of them, such as List of Connecticut tornadoes, List of Snow events in Florida and List of Delaware hurricanes could be converted into tables.
The Lists of gay, lesbian or bisexual people are often showing up in the cleanup listing for questionable sources and unsourced statements. I decided not to include them here, but they should be watched.
Of course, the brutal irony is that I supported most of these lists' promotion to FL status.
On two sports lists:
I'll stick to what I'm pretty sure of.
I am categorizing these FLs by six types. Please note that I only think the FLs in A, B or F should be delisted. The rest I am noting more for curiosities sake.
It's important to note that these are just the lists in which I see immediate problems. If a page is not listed here, it does not necessarily mean that I think it's perfectly fine (there are a lot of minor issues like small leads, improperly formatted references out there that weren't listed).
Feel free to add any list you think fits in with the types. However, please make sure you add your signature. I would appreciate it if users could avoid commenting on this page until I finish.
For the most part, the tallest buildings pages are a very well-maintained group of lists. A few minor issues here and there, like improperly formatted refs. I'm still not sure if List of tallest buildings and structures in Salford is notable and does List of tallest buildings in Portland, Oregon really need to have (Image) in ever row? Why not just incorporate the images into the table? In List of tallest buildings in Seattle, the least clearly states the the Space Needle is not ranked because it is not a building, yet it is included in the "Timeline of tallest buildings" section (I actually brought this up in the FLC and it was fixed, but I guess it's been reverted).
In regards to the episode lists, there seems to be no set standard, almost every one (especially the anime lists) uses a different type of formatting. That's not necessarily a bad thing, it just might help if things were more uniform.
A question: Does the band actually receive awards for videos? For example, if an artist won an MTV Video award for "Best editing", would the editor not be the one to receive the award and not the artist? So would it not be a mistake to include such awards in the list of awards won by that artist?
I am not going to include all of the "List of [team] first-round draft picks" lists here. I believe they are unnecessary forks, but some of them are long enough to not be Type As.
I'm not going to include them here, but most of the NHL trophy pages could use bigger leads and in some cases the refs need to be properly formatted. (It's worth noting that I did nominate several of them, so if anyone thinks I'm being too easy on them, let me know).
Just a general comment about the lists of counties, some of them need to be brought up to current standards. For example, List of counties in Arizona is of noticeable lesser quality than List of counties in Kentucky.
Generally a nice group of lists. I'm wondering if some of them, such as List of Connecticut tornadoes, List of Snow events in Florida and List of Delaware hurricanes could be converted into tables.
The Lists of gay, lesbian or bisexual people are often showing up in the cleanup listing for questionable sources and unsourced statements. I decided not to include them here, but they should be watched.
Of course, the brutal irony is that I supported most of these lists' promotion to FL status.
On two sports lists:
I'll stick to what I'm pretty sure of.