You will be compiling your bibliography and creating an outline of the changes you will make in this sandbox.
 | Bibliography
As you gather the sources for your Wikipedia contribution, think about the following:
|
-
[1]
- This is a peer reviewed article in Feminist Studies from JSTOR, so it should be a reliable source. It covers our topic of the WSP in depth and how the leaders of the organization went about using their voices during the Cold War.
-
[2]
- This is a reliable source from JSTOR. A snippet of the impact of the WSP during the Cold War and protesting nuclear strikes.
-
[3]
- This is an article from the university's online library, so it should be a reliable source. It covers our topic, specifically when the WSP interacted with Vietnamese unions.
-
[4]
- This is an article from the university's online library, so it should be a reliable source. It covers the history and lasting impacts of the Women's Peace Movement.
-
[5]
- This article is from the University of London's School of Advanced Studies online library, so it should be a reliable source. The article analyzes the WSP and the changes it brought domestically in the 1960s.
-
[6]
- This is a book from our university's library, so it should be a reliable source. It covers women's involvement in environmentalism during the Cold War.
-
[7]
- This is a journal source from JSTOR about the nuclear testing site in Nevada in the 1950s. It adds more information and background to our topic of the peace movement.
-
[8]
- This is an academic journal from JSTOR, which adds more information to the effects of nuclear testing on the atmosphere and more background as to why the WSP started striking.
| Examples:
|
- ^ Swerdlow, Amy (1982). "Ladies' Day at the Capitol: Women Strike for Peace versus HUAC". Feminist Studies. 8 (3): 493–520. doi: 10.2307/3177709. ISSN 0046-3663.
- ^ Robinson, Kathy Crandall (2021). "LOOKING BACK: The Power of Women Strike for Peace". Arms Control Today. 51 (9): 33–36. ISSN 0196-125X.
-
^ Frazier, Jessica M. (2012-07).
"Collaborative Efforts to End the War in Viet Nam: The Interactions of Women Strike for Peace, the Vietnamese Women's Union, and the Women's Union of Liberation, 1965–1968". Peace & Change. 37 (3): 339–365.
doi:
10.1111/j.1468-0130.2012.00754.x.
ISSN
0149-0508.
{{ cite journal}}: Check date values in:|date=( help) - ^ ""Basically Feminist": Women Strike for Peace, - ProQuest". www.proquest.com. Retrieved 2024-03-08.
- ^ Coburn, Jon (2015-09-25). "'Just a Housewife': The Feminine Mystique, Women Strike for Peace and Domestic Identity in 1960s America". History of Women in the Americas. 3 (0). doi: 10.14296/hwa.v3i0.2189. ISSN 2042-6348.
-
^ Spears, Ellen Griffith (2019-06-28).
"Rethinking the American Environmental Movement post-1945".
doi:
10.4324/9780203081693.
{{ cite journal}}: Cite journal requires|journal=( help) - ^ Kirk, Andrew (2012-07-01). "Rereading the Nature of Atomic Doom Towns". Environmental History. 17 (3): 635–647. doi: 10.1093/envhis/ems049. ISSN 1084-5453.
- ^ Higuchi, Toshihiro (2018-01-01). "Epistemic frictions: radioactive fallout, health risk assessments, and the Eisenhower administration's nuclear-test ban policy, 1954–1958". International Relations of the Asia-Pacific. 18 (1): 99–124. doi: 10.1093/irap/lcx024. ISSN 1470-482X.
Click on the edit button to draft your outline.
| Now that you have compiled a bibliography, it's time to plan out how you'll improve your assigned article.
In this section, write up a concise outline of how the sources you've identified will add relevant information to your chosen article. Be sure to discuss what content gap your additions tackle and how these additions will improve the article's quality. Consider other changes you'll make to the article, including possible deletions of irrelevant, outdated, or incorrect information, restructuring of the article to improve its readability or any other change you plan on making. This is your chance to really think about how your proposed additions will improve your chosen article and to vet your sources even further. Note: This is not a draft. This is an outline/plan where you can think about how the sources you've identified will fill in a content gap. |
You will be compiling your bibliography and creating an outline of the changes you will make in this sandbox.
| Bibliography
As you gather the sources for your Wikipedia contribution, think about the following:
|
-
[1]
- This is a peer reviewed article in Feminist Studies from JSTOR, so it should be a reliable source. It covers our topic of the WSP in depth and how the leaders of the organization went about using their voices during the Cold War.
-
[2]
- This is a reliable source from JSTOR. A snippet of the impact of the WSP during the Cold War and protesting nuclear strikes.
-
[3]
- This is an article from the university's online library, so it should be a reliable source. It covers our topic, specifically when the WSP interacted with Vietnamese unions.
-
[4]
- This is an article from the university's online library, so it should be a reliable source. It covers the history and lasting impacts of the Women's Peace Movement.
-
[5]
- This article is from the University of London's School of Advanced Studies online library, so it should be a reliable source. The article analyzes the WSP and the changes it brought domestically in the 1960s.
-
[6]
- This is a book from our university's library, so it should be a reliable source. It covers women's involvement in environmentalism during the Cold War.
-
[7]
- This is a journal source from JSTOR about the nuclear testing site in Nevada in the 1950s. It adds more information and background to our topic of the peace movement.
-
[8]
- This is an academic journal from JSTOR, which adds more information to the effects of nuclear testing on the atmosphere and more background as to why the WSP started striking.
| Examples:
|
- ^ Swerdlow, Amy (1982). "Ladies' Day at the Capitol: Women Strike for Peace versus HUAC". Feminist Studies. 8 (3): 493–520. doi: 10.2307/3177709. ISSN 0046-3663.
- ^ Robinson, Kathy Crandall (2021). "LOOKING BACK: The Power of Women Strike for Peace". Arms Control Today. 51 (9): 33–36. ISSN 0196-125X.
-
^ Frazier, Jessica M. (2012-07).
"Collaborative Efforts to End the War in Viet Nam: The Interactions of Women Strike for Peace, the Vietnamese Women's Union, and the Women's Union of Liberation, 1965–1968". Peace & Change. 37 (3): 339–365.
doi:
10.1111/j.1468-0130.2012.00754.x.
ISSN
0149-0508.
{{ cite journal}}: Check date values in:|date=( help) - ^ ""Basically Feminist": Women Strike for Peace, - ProQuest". www.proquest.com. Retrieved 2024-03-08.
- ^ Coburn, Jon (2015-09-25). "'Just a Housewife': The Feminine Mystique, Women Strike for Peace and Domestic Identity in 1960s America". History of Women in the Americas. 3 (0). doi: 10.14296/hwa.v3i0.2189. ISSN 2042-6348.
-
^ Spears, Ellen Griffith (2019-06-28).
"Rethinking the American Environmental Movement post-1945".
doi:
10.4324/9780203081693.
{{ cite journal}}: Cite journal requires|journal=( help) - ^ Kirk, Andrew (2012-07-01). "Rereading the Nature of Atomic Doom Towns". Environmental History. 17 (3): 635–647. doi: 10.1093/envhis/ems049. ISSN 1084-5453.
- ^ Higuchi, Toshihiro (2018-01-01). "Epistemic frictions: radioactive fallout, health risk assessments, and the Eisenhower administration's nuclear-test ban policy, 1954–1958". International Relations of the Asia-Pacific. 18 (1): 99–124. doi: 10.1093/irap/lcx024. ISSN 1470-482X.
Click on the edit button to draft your outline.
| Now that you have compiled a bibliography, it's time to plan out how you'll improve your assigned article.
In this section, write up a concise outline of how the sources you've identified will add relevant information to your chosen article. Be sure to discuss what content gap your additions tackle and how these additions will improve the article's quality. Consider other changes you'll make to the article, including possible deletions of irrelevant, outdated, or incorrect information, restructuring of the article to improve its readability or any other change you plan on making. This is your chance to really think about how your proposed additions will improve your chosen article and to vet your sources even further. Note: This is not a draft. This is an outline/plan where you can think about how the sources you've identified will fill in a content gap. |