 | Evaluate an article
Complete your article evaluation below. Here are the key aspects to consider: Lead sectionA good lead section defines the topic and provides a concise overview. A reader who just wants to identify the topic can read the first sentence. A reader who wants a very brief overview of the most important things about it can read the first paragraph. A reader who wants a quick overview can read the whole lead section.
ContentA good Wikipedia article should cover all the important aspects of a topic, without putting too much weight on one part while neglecting another.
Tone and BalanceWikipedia articles should be written from a neutral point of view; if there are substantial differences of interpretation or controversies among published, reliable sources, those views should be described as fairly as possible.
Sources and ReferencesA Wikipedia article should be based on the best sources available for the topic at hand. When possible, this means academic and peer-reviewed publications or scholarly books.
Organization and writing qualityThe writing should be clear and professional, the content should be organized sensibly into sections.
Images and Media
Talk page discussionThe article's talk page — and any discussions among other Wikipedia editors that have been taking place there — can be a useful window into the state of an article, and might help you focus on important aspects that you didn't think of.
Overall impressions
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved. |
Which article are you evaluating?
I am evaluating the article of La Cambre. This was found by searching through the academic links and going to schools of architecture
Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because architecture has always been of interest to me so I thought it would be a nice experience to learn and see something new in regard to the field of architecture.
Evaluate the article
The article is rather concise and it is more fact based. It deals with many of the details of the architectural school, La Cambre. It is a visual arts school in Brussels. Interesting to note that the school was divided to two in the 80s. The article has a good good lead section as it covers many of the key facts regarding La Cambre. The lead is rather concise and covers what will be featured in the rest of the article. The content in the article is very appropriate as it includes all relevant information that is also up to date. The articles tone is rather neutral. The article does not necessarily aim to persuade any reader in favor of one position, rather, it is based solely on neutral facts. The article is certainly well written as it gives all the necessary information. It also includes the foreign translations of certain words that gives a better sense of where the school is. There are no images or media content on the article itself, but if one clicks on the sources, one can find various pictures and media content.
| Evaluate an article
Complete your article evaluation below. Here are the key aspects to consider: Lead sectionA good lead section defines the topic and provides a concise overview. A reader who just wants to identify the topic can read the first sentence. A reader who wants a very brief overview of the most important things about it can read the first paragraph. A reader who wants a quick overview can read the whole lead section.
ContentA good Wikipedia article should cover all the important aspects of a topic, without putting too much weight on one part while neglecting another.
Tone and BalanceWikipedia articles should be written from a neutral point of view; if there are substantial differences of interpretation or controversies among published, reliable sources, those views should be described as fairly as possible.
Sources and ReferencesA Wikipedia article should be based on the best sources available for the topic at hand. When possible, this means academic and peer-reviewed publications or scholarly books.
Organization and writing qualityThe writing should be clear and professional, the content should be organized sensibly into sections.
Images and Media
Talk page discussionThe article's talk page — and any discussions among other Wikipedia editors that have been taking place there — can be a useful window into the state of an article, and might help you focus on important aspects that you didn't think of.
Overall impressions
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved. |
Which article are you evaluating?
I am evaluating the article of La Cambre. This was found by searching through the academic links and going to schools of architecture
Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because architecture has always been of interest to me so I thought it would be a nice experience to learn and see something new in regard to the field of architecture.
Evaluate the article
The article is rather concise and it is more fact based. It deals with many of the details of the architectural school, La Cambre. It is a visual arts school in Brussels. Interesting to note that the school was divided to two in the 80s. The article has a good good lead section as it covers many of the key facts regarding La Cambre. The lead is rather concise and covers what will be featured in the rest of the article. The content in the article is very appropriate as it includes all relevant information that is also up to date. The articles tone is rather neutral. The article does not necessarily aim to persuade any reader in favor of one position, rather, it is based solely on neutral facts. The article is certainly well written as it gives all the necessary information. It also includes the foreign translations of certain words that gives a better sense of where the school is. There are no images or media content on the article itself, but if one clicks on the sources, one can find various pictures and media content.