This is Rumiton's sandbox.
![]() | This page is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Tu vois bien qu'est folle
Doing my best to improve the tiny little wedge in the top center:
17 in (431.8 mm) * [2] This article is written in British English, and some terms used in it are different or absent from American English and other varieties of English. This should not be changed without broad consensus. In particular, the British spelling of artefact should not be changed to artifact, which is the American spelling. [ [3]] xx Rumiton ( talk) 13:16, 7 November 2012 (UTC) ship
qué practico es encentrar el lugar donde no tienen cabida ni el futuro ni el passado. [4]
@Richwales. Thanks for giving me this opportunity. Every question merits an essay, but I will be as concise as I can.
1. Briefly, what do you think are the best aspects of the Prem Rawat article as it currently stands?
2. Briefly, and without going into excessive detail or becoming confrontational, what do you think are the worst aspects of the article as it currently stands?
3. How do you feel the core Wikipedia content policies ( WP:NPOV, WP:NOR, WP:V, and WP:BLP) should guide the content of the Prem Rawat article and related articles? In particular, to what extent do you believe the BLP policy may limit our ability to write a fair, balanced, and neutral article here?
4. How should the Wikipedia community handle situations where various people have widely differing views on what the Prem Rawat article should contain and how it should be written? Do you believe it is possible for editors working on this article to reach a balanced consensus that is neither a whitewash nor an attack piece? To what extent (if any) do you believe the logjams can be resolved only by banning certain people (possibly you, possibly others, but don't name names here) from working on the article at all?
5. To what extent (if any) do you feel you are willing to accept content in the Prem Rawat article with which you are not personally comfortable?
6. Do you believe you are able (and willing) to write in a way that fairly, accurately, and neutrally presents views regarding Prem Rawat with which you personally disagree?
I asked C'est alors que j'ai prié un agent de police de l'arrêter. I asked for a glass of water. here here
[speech here]
This is Rumiton's sandbox.
![]() | This page is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Tu vois bien qu'est folle
Doing my best to improve the tiny little wedge in the top center:
17 in (431.8 mm) * [2] This article is written in British English, and some terms used in it are different or absent from American English and other varieties of English. This should not be changed without broad consensus. In particular, the British spelling of artefact should not be changed to artifact, which is the American spelling. [ [3]] xx Rumiton ( talk) 13:16, 7 November 2012 (UTC) ship
qué practico es encentrar el lugar donde no tienen cabida ni el futuro ni el passado. [4]
@Richwales. Thanks for giving me this opportunity. Every question merits an essay, but I will be as concise as I can.
1. Briefly, what do you think are the best aspects of the Prem Rawat article as it currently stands?
2. Briefly, and without going into excessive detail or becoming confrontational, what do you think are the worst aspects of the article as it currently stands?
3. How do you feel the core Wikipedia content policies ( WP:NPOV, WP:NOR, WP:V, and WP:BLP) should guide the content of the Prem Rawat article and related articles? In particular, to what extent do you believe the BLP policy may limit our ability to write a fair, balanced, and neutral article here?
4. How should the Wikipedia community handle situations where various people have widely differing views on what the Prem Rawat article should contain and how it should be written? Do you believe it is possible for editors working on this article to reach a balanced consensus that is neither a whitewash nor an attack piece? To what extent (if any) do you believe the logjams can be resolved only by banning certain people (possibly you, possibly others, but don't name names here) from working on the article at all?
5. To what extent (if any) do you feel you are willing to accept content in the Prem Rawat article with which you are not personally comfortable?
6. Do you believe you are able (and willing) to write in a way that fairly, accurately, and neutrally presents views regarding Prem Rawat with which you personally disagree?
I asked C'est alors que j'ai prié un agent de police de l'arrêter. I asked for a glass of water. here here
[speech here]