 | This is not a Wikipedia article: It is an individual user's work-in-progress page, and may be incomplete and/or unreliable. For guidance on developing this draft, see
Wikipedia:So you made a userspace draft. Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL |
Fluoride Action Network is a nonprofit organization set up by chemists, biochemists, lawyers, dentists, and other health care professionals concerned about the misinformation being promulgated throughout the internet about the "health benefits" and safety of fluorine additives to water supplies in the US, Canada, Australian, NZ, and Ireland. [1]
Main arguments against fluoridation Not safe, not effective, not efficient. [2]
Main Primary Sources National Academies of Science Report Summaries: Basically, in 60 years of artificial water fluoridation, no studies have been of level I: most studies have been poorly designed and are of poor quality. [3] Their recommendations of providing more rigorous research have not been followed.
References
- ^ http://fluoridealertaustralia.squarespace.com/
- ^ The Case Against Fluoride: Dr. Paul Connett
- ^ http://dels.nas.edu/Report/Fluoride-Drinking-Water-Scientific/11571?bname=
External links
| This is not a Wikipedia article: It is an individual user's work-in-progress page, and may be incomplete and/or unreliable. For guidance on developing this draft, see
Wikipedia:So you made a userspace draft. Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL |
Fluoride Action Network is a nonprofit organization set up by chemists, biochemists, lawyers, dentists, and other health care professionals concerned about the misinformation being promulgated throughout the internet about the "health benefits" and safety of fluorine additives to water supplies in the US, Canada, Australian, NZ, and Ireland. [1]
Main arguments against fluoridation Not safe, not effective, not efficient. [2]
Main Primary Sources National Academies of Science Report Summaries: Basically, in 60 years of artificial water fluoridation, no studies have been of level I: most studies have been poorly designed and are of poor quality. [3] Their recommendations of providing more rigorous research have not been followed.
References
- ^ http://fluoridealertaustralia.squarespace.com/
- ^ The Case Against Fluoride: Dr. Paul Connett
- ^ http://dels.nas.edu/Report/Fluoride-Drinking-Water-Scientific/11571?bname=
External links