This is a log of all proposed deletion tags applied or endorsed by this user using Twinkle's PROD module.

If you no longer wish to keep this log, you can turn it off using the preferences panel, and nominate this page for speedy deletion under CSD U1.

1. Demon (Buffy the Vampire Slayer): PROD; notified Paxomen ( talk · contribs) 07:49, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: Long-term unsourced article consisting mostly of original research and excessive plot summary.

1. Re Conegrade Ltd: PROD; notified Wikidea ( talk · contribs) 08:46, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: No sources, and no indication that this case played any important role in setting precedent.
2. Artkore: PROD; notified Zarashen ( talk · contribs) 10:11, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Unsourced and non-notable album. I can find no sources that would demonstrate notability.
3. The Bitter Price of Love: PROD; notified Emily Baxter ( talk · contribs) 07:27, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Unsourced plot summary. There's no indication of notability for this book.
4. Avarkhod: PROD; notified Starzynka ( talk · contribs) 07:36, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Article name does not match the subject and I cannot verify which of the two it's actually about or if any of the information in it is correct. Unsourced; previously only referenced to a unreliable source.

1. Basic object system: PROD; notified 203.109.249.133 ( talk · contribs) 08:12, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Non-notable programming library, unsourced, and written like a guide rather than an encyclopedia article

1. Etherpunk: PROD; notified Monkybrain ( talk · contribs) 07:15, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Non-notable and unsourced, and my own searches turn up nothing relevant or reliable.
2. Discontinuity view: PROD; notified 129.170.95.66 ( talk · contribs) 10:27, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: This concept does not appear notable and is written entirely in an essayish tone. One alleged source does not mention the subject, and the other seems to have always been dead.
3. ESIGNET Project: PROD; notified LarryHughes ( talk · contribs) 10:35, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Does not appear to be a notable research initiative. The project's own website is dead, and I can find nothing much else except for WP mirrors.
4. Boxology: PROD; notified Zowie ( talk · contribs) 07:48, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Unsourced article about a non-notable term. All I can find is unrelated businesses with the same name.
5. Zonk (game): PROD; notified Kadjii ( talk · contribs) 13:34, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Wikipedia is not for things made up one day even if you then make a home page for it and use that as a "source"
6. Tower Guard of Gondor: PROD; notified Agamus ( talk · contribs) 09:59, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Minor fictional organisation. This article is unsourced and I can't find anything that would demonstrate that it meets WP:N
7. Stowboard: PROD; notified Sentiencerocks ( talk · contribs) 10:01, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: This is an advertising brochure for a non-notable product.

1. Calgary Student Caucus: PROD; notified CalgaryStudents ( talk · contribs) 08:38, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Unsourced article about a non-notable organisation
2. Vroom Framework: PROD; notified Ijazfx ( talk · contribs) 07:48, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Non-notable software. I can't find any sources beyond github and sourceforge entries.

1. The Dice Tower: PROD; notified Waza ( talk · contribs) 10:35, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: This does not seem to be a notable podcast. Only sources are the subject's own website, a youtube channel, and a blog.
2. VirtualDJ: PROD; notified Djcel ( talk · contribs) 14:49, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: This advertising brochure is sourced only to the product's own website and I can't find anything better.

1. Sundeep Kochar: PROD; notified Bullus ( talk · contribs) 09:26, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fawning promotional article by an editor blocked for writing similar spam articles. The "awards" won all seem to be very sketchy.

1. Megalister: PROD; notified Soczyczi ( talk · contribs) 09:05, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Stubbish, poorly sourced dicdef. The one source listed does not verify the content, and I can find nothing suitable either.
2. Meddius: PROD; notified CharlottesvilleVA ( talk · contribs) 09:26, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails WP:NCORP. The article gives the impression of being properly sourced but, on inspection, the sources are actually about the founder and not the company itself. Indeed, Jeff Gunther is an almost word-for-word copy of this article. I can find no other sources that would indicate the notability of this minor company.
3. Co-CreateLinux: PROD; notified 218.102.147.44 ( talk · contribs) 09:21, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Non-notable defunct Linux distro. I can find no sources beyond directory listings of many distributions, certainly nothing substantial and independent.
4. Coats of arms of Spanish colonies: PROD; notified RickW2 ( talk · contribs) 10:34, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: This is merely an image gallery, which is discouraged.
5. LOUD: PROD; notified Greg4cr ( talk · contribs) 08:18, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Non-notable ubuntu variant. No reliable secondary sources that I can find.

1. Project blog: PROD; notified Chowdrew ( talk · contribs) 11:43, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Dubious and vague article of promotional tone. The sources listed seem to be only tangentially related.
2. WxGlade: PROD; notified 64.230.23.201 ( talk · contribs) 09:15, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: This is an infomercial/how-to guide for non-notable software. None of the sources in the article are reliable secondary sources, and I can find nothing better.
3. Reasonable Server Faces: PROD; notified JohnNorman ( talk · contribs) 12:48, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Unsourced article about non-notable software. I can find nothing that would justify including this on the encyclopedia

1. KEduca: PROD; notified 193.11.19.5 ( talk · contribs) 14:45, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Non-notable abandoned software sourced only to the project homepage. I can't find any evidence of significant independent coverage.
2. Pulseprogramming: PROD; notified Solumeiras ( talk · contribs) 14:06, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Vague but overly promotional article about an artistic group of some kind. Most of the content is a catalogue of their works, it's entirely unsourced, and I can find nothing that would indicate notability.
3. Lagoona (programming language): PROD; notified 65.146.233.252 ( talk · contribs) 11:15, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: This seems to be a non-notable programming language. The only sources are to the inventor's home age, and I can't find any independent, reliable sources that would indicate notability.
4. George W. Howe: PROD; notified Mishae ( talk · contribs) 11:40, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: I can find no indication that this person meets WP:NACADEMICS
5. Fernando Vazquez: PROD; notified 140.247.171.138 ( talk · contribs) 14:29, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Unsourced microstub about an obscure theologian; passing mention in one book and nothing is known of his life.

1. DaGeek: PROD; notified Jóhann Heiðar Árnason ( talk · contribs) 17:45, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
   • Reason: Non-notable social network site. Both links are dead, and I can find no sources elsewhere to demonstrate notability.
2. Happidog: PROD; notified Dawson ( talk · contribs) 14:20, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
   • Reason: Blatant advertising brochure sourced only to the company itself. It is full of unsupported assertions and speculations. I can't find anything by searching about this topic except unrelated dog memes.
3. Jia Chen: PROD; notified Duncan* ( talk · contribs) 06:52, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
   • Reason: This autobiography is nothing more than a résumé.

1. Remote Telescope Markup Language: PROD; notified Leif ( talk · contribs) 07:37, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
   • Reason: Does not appear to be a notable programming language. I can find only a handful of references, and these are articles written by RTML's creators. There is no evidence that the outside world has taken note.
2. Best Laid Plans (web series): PROD; notified Jjbridge ( talk · contribs) 12:16, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
   • Reason: Non-notable web series. The only sources in the article, or which I can find anywhere, are to the series' own website.
3. Flexpde: PROD; notified Asympt ( talk · contribs) 14:18, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
   • Reason: This does not appear to be notable software. Except for its own website I can find no reliable secondary coverage.
4. Weapons used by John Dillinger: PROD; notified Aldaden ( talk · contribs) 13:23, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
   • Reason: Poorly sourced, overly detailed listcruft. This would be excessive trivia even if merged into John Dillinger and the title is not useful as a redirect.
5. JavaForge: PROD; notified JPB24 ( talk · contribs) 06:46, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
   • Reason: Does not appear notable. I can't find anything beyond the project's own pages and a smattering of very passing mentions.
6. HackMaster (software): PROD; notified Percy Snoodle ( talk · contribs) 10:29, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
   • Reason: Does not seem to be notable software. Sourced only to the project's home page and the only thing that comes up in my searches is related to the game of the same name.
7. Direct Attack: PROD; notified Professa20 ( talk · contribs) 05:18, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
   • Reason: This musical group does not appear to meet WP:BAND. There are no independent, substantial sources about this band either in the article or that I can find anywhere else.

1. CABIE: PROD; notified Getsw ( talk · contribs) 12:50, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
   • Reason: This software does not appear notable, is only sourced to its own home page, and I can find nothing better.

1. Cali dheere (clan): PROD; notified Xardeeye ( talk · contribs) 12:40, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
   • Reason: Incoherent article about a non-notable topic. The only sources are forums and blogs, and a single sentence name drop in a book. Even if it were possible to determine what this is about, it would need to be blown up and started from scratch.

1. Gufuu shogi: PROD; notified DeepNikita ( talk · contribs) 21:13, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
   • Reason: This does not appear to be a notable game. The content is speculative, and the only sources are not independent.
2. Chris Gradwell: PROD; notified Roedhaaret ( talk · contribs) 08:22, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
   • Reason: This is the biography of a non-notable musician. The only source in the article is a mere name-drop and I can find nothing better, just hits for different people with the same name.

1. Actionuni: PROD; notified Picasso73 ( talk · contribs) 20:03, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
   • Reason: I'm not sure this organisation is notable. I can't find much in the way of independent sources, and the current content seems an uncomfortably close paraphrase
2. Towards Specific and Accurate Criteria to Evaluate Arab and International Strategic Studies Centers (2012/2013): PROD; notified The ECSSR ( talk · contribs) 22:06, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
   • Reason: Poorly sourced essay
3. Rattling Bones: PROD; notified Jobaecker ( talk · contribs) 15:03, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
   • Reason: Sourceless article about an unsuccessful band, no credible indication of notability. I also note that the article was written by one of the members.

1. Comparison of Axis & Allies games: PROD; notified KelvSYC ( talk · contribs) 23:24, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: This article is 99.9% original research and the two sources it does have are primary. "Comparison of XYZ" articles usually get deleted if they go to AfD.

1. 2010 ICC World Twenty20 officials: PROD; notified Karyasuman ( talk · contribs) 23:29, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Non-notable list of officials. What little actual text there is, is a word-for-word copy of an ICC press release, which makes it possibly a copyright violation as well.
2. Strategic initiative: PROD; notified GGithens ( talk · contribs) 15:03, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Confusing and unclear jumble of marketing buzzwords sourced mostly to the article author's blogs.
3. Proactive contracting: PROD; notified Atpleth ( talk · contribs) 07:42, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Mostly meaningless jargon-laden marketing talk with the lingering odor of promotion. The sources are either dead links, wild goose chases, or serve only to synthesise the topic from sources not actually about it.

1. Demand modeling: PROD; notified Goattender ( talk · contribs) 10:53, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: This buzzword soup is a mish-mash synthesis of sources that don't mention the phrase "demand modeling". It's also written as a personal essay. I can't find any decent sources on which to base an article about this topic.
2. Bridge life-cycle cost analysis: PROD; notified CHARLESbRUNELLE ( talk · contribs) 13:25, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: This is just whole-life cost applied specifically to bridges. The point of this article is unclear, especially since the content is full of buzzwords not specific to bridges anyway.
3. Edifice Technologies: PROD; notified Edifice Technologies ( talk · contribs) 06:39, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Promotional brochure for a company that seems to fail WP:NCORP. Of the sources, two do not mention the subject, one is a permanent deadlink, and the other is an advertisement.

1. Rivermine: PROD; notified Ldimon ( talk · contribs) 10:40, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Just an advertising brochure for a non-notable, now taken over, company. No indication of meeting WP:NCORP.

1. Service science and engineering: PROD; notified Tilburg-ipo ( talk · contribs) 13:52, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: This expositional essay is little more than vague buzzword salad. None of the sources in the article mention the subject and I've been unable to find anything elsewhere that does mention it.
2. Alliant Merchant Services: PROD; notified Jay72488 ( talk · contribs) 07:23, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: does not appear to pass WP:NCORP. The sources are pretty poor and marginal, and I've been unable to find anything better

1. Service science, management and engineering: PROD; notified Cnay ( talk · contribs) 14:51, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: This buzzword salad has been nothing but a faintly promotional pedagogical essay since it was written. Most of the sources it contains are deadlinks or useless red herrings, and my own searches have come up with nothing. Largely this is because the subject is so vague and obscured by buzzwords that it is legitimately impossible to tell if a possible source is about the same subject. In any case, even if this article was about anything at all (it's not) it would still be necessary to rewrite it from scratch since the current content is irreparably unencyclopedic.
2. Telephonetics: PROD; notified Mgoode75 ( talk · contribs) 11:41, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: This now-absorbed company shows no evidence of meeting WP:NCORP, and the purchasing company Netcall seems not to either. I can't find anything beyond directory listings, so nothing that would satisfy our notability requirements.
3. Commercialization Reactor: PROD; notified EddyGR ( talk · contribs) 14:59, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: This buzzword-infested article about a non-notable topic is unambiguous advertising, and large parts of it are copied and pasted directly from copyrighted sources such as this.
4. Asset reuse: PROD; notified KWolfram ( talk · contribs) 10:11, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: This fog of marketing buzzwords says nothing more than that it's handy to be able to use software again. This is an encyclopedia, not Wikiplatitude.
5. Ideawicket: PROD; notified Innovator2099 ( talk · contribs) 07:15, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Promotional article about a non-notable and now defunct company, filled with corporate buzzword blather. The company that bought it hasn't got an article so there is nothing to merge or redirect to.
6. Cognitive Computing Research Group: PROD; notified EugeneForrester ( talk · contribs) 15:14, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: This article is sourced only to the subject's own website, and my searches don't turn up anything substantial.
7. Sustainable services: PROD; notified EugeneForrester ( talk · contribs) 8:33, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: This is a badly written argumentative essay. Much of the content has been synthesized from tangentially related sources and the content is mostly an impenetrable fog of corporate buzzwords.

1. Sustainable Harvest International: PROD; notified Rosasangre ( talk · contribs) 18:15, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: This charitable organisation does not meet our notability requirements for organisations. The sources in the article are just passing mentions and I have been unable to find anything better in searches.
2. Workforce planning: PROD; notified Happyfish ( talk · contribs) 07:05, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Another banal buzzword soup, poorly sourced and written in an essay style, about a topic too vaguely defined to be treated encyclopedically.
3. CalConnect: PROD; notified Maryannrudy ( talk · contribs) 12:28, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: This is an overly promotional and buzzword-obfuscated article about an organisation that does not appear to meet our notability requirements. Although I could verify that this exists, all the actually decent sources were about unrelated things involving California.
4. Four phase model: PROD; notified Wirjohardjono ( talk · contribs) 07:58, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Buzzword salad, and unduly self promotional. All my searches for the phrase "four phase model" gave results for unrelated things with the same name.
5. Carbon process management: PROD; notified Nobbyneb ( talk · contribs) 09:14, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: None of the sources refer to this vaguely defined concept by name, and my searches have turned up only a lot of unrelated stuff.
6. Attra: PROD; notified Cnptech ( talk · contribs) 16:23, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Promotional article about a company that does not pass WP:NCORP. The single source it cites does not mention the subject. My own searches can barely verify that this exists, among a mountain of hits for other companies called Attra, at least two of which have better claims to notability than this one.
7. Mid-Atlantic Technology, Research and Innovation Center: PROD; notified WVhybrid ( talk · contribs) 06:24, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: This is a promotional brochure about a company that does not meet WP:NCORP.

1. Infocad.FM – CAFM system: PROD; notified R3dcarpet ( talk · contribs) 07:51, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Completely unsourced, and I can find no substantial coverage beyond product home pages and WP mirrors. Tagged as an advertisement for over a decade.
2. Design-driven development: PROD; notified 220.227.177.205 ( talk · contribs) 08:44, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Vague, unsourced article full of mushy marketing buzzwords and written in a promotional, expositional style. Unsalvageable.
3. DPCI: PROD; notified Jagror ( talk · contribs) 09:26, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: This is an advertisement sourced mainly to primary sources. I can find no evidence that this meets WP:NCORP
4. Common Data Set: PROD; notified Ephery ( talk · contribs) 15:13, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: This initiative doesn't seem notable. THe article is mostly unsourced- two of the three sources are primary and one does not mention the subject.
5. Solar powered stadiums: PROD; notified Sarahjb49 ( talk · contribs) 17:49, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Not an encyclopedia topic. Consists of an essay-style exposition and the sources discuss individual instances of someone putting a solar panel somewhere, not a treatment of the topic itself.
6. M. Tech Clinical engineering: PROD; notified Bioaditya ( talk · contribs) 15:39, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Inherently promotional in tone and doesn't have the reliable independent sources necessary to support an article. Individual university courses typically don't meet notability requirements and this is no exception.
7. TruePic: PROD; notified Optomaniac ( talk · contribs) 15:48, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: This has been marked (correctly) as an advertisement for over a decade. The only sources for this product are company press releases.

1. Tourist attractions in Warsaw: PROD; notified Halibutt ( talk · contribs) 22:45, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: This is fundamentally a tourist guide, a textbook example of what Wikipedia is not.