Pending changes backlog
(
review log)
Very low backlog
[
view •
purge •
update]
0 pages according to DatBot 17:30, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Some articles (and a template) I've worked way too long on.
|
---|
Sorry for clogging up your edit history views... WP:NOW I actually spent time on:
And finally... Details, details... |
Personal Mistake Log.
|
---|
Copyvio stats. Wasn't originally going to do copyvios, until I thought about turning an article into a GA... and well, got sucked in...
(and got sucked in even more when I saw there were copyvios from students being put into articles, and vice versa, what the heck WikiEdu!) Copyvios: 2 fails in the edit filter, 1 with the traditional template, out of... 22-ish copyvios? 86% accuracy?
... uh, you be the judge on my doubting accuracy. Or if it's just the rev-delete template... 2/15, Still 86% accurate. Seems good, but isn't too great if one were an actual engineer... (But hey, at least we're on Wikipedia, and not building an airplane... woof.) And Template:Current section is probably useless Failed ping? Edit the comment and link to the user in the edit summary. Finally, if you activate ClueBot III, don't forget to add a space...
|
Note to self: Always read WP:RS/PS
Plus, an alternative to Google Scholar's rankings
Plus, a Copyvio detector.
Finally, WP:CLIST.
Userboxes | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Pending changes backlog
(
review log)
Very low backlog
[
view •
purge •
update]
0 pages according to DatBot 17:30, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Some articles (and a template) I've worked way too long on.
|
---|
Sorry for clogging up your edit history views... WP:NOW I actually spent time on:
And finally... Details, details... |
Personal Mistake Log.
|
---|
Copyvio stats. Wasn't originally going to do copyvios, until I thought about turning an article into a GA... and well, got sucked in...
(and got sucked in even more when I saw there were copyvios from students being put into articles, and vice versa, what the heck WikiEdu!) Copyvios: 2 fails in the edit filter, 1 with the traditional template, out of... 22-ish copyvios? 86% accuracy?
... uh, you be the judge on my doubting accuracy. Or if it's just the rev-delete template... 2/15, Still 86% accurate. Seems good, but isn't too great if one were an actual engineer... (But hey, at least we're on Wikipedia, and not building an airplane... woof.) And Template:Current section is probably useless Failed ping? Edit the comment and link to the user in the edit summary. Finally, if you activate ClueBot III, don't forget to add a space...
|
Note to self: Always read WP:RS/PS
Plus, an alternative to Google Scholar's rankings
Plus, a Copyvio detector.
Finally, WP:CLIST.
Userboxes | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|