This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.
The Lead does include an introduction paragraph that describes the articles topic and the articles major sections. The lead is very concise and the article is well organized.
The content in this article is relevant and the page was last edited in 2018 so it seems up to date. The article seems to flow well.
The article seems neutral but also seems to be opinions present due to the fact it is an ongoing article where people add "not their favorite members of the LGBTQIA but lasting impacted people". The topics are very detailed and the subject seems to be very inclusive. The article is informative and not persuasive.
There are many sources and they seem to be reliable and statements written seem to be true and informative. The sources are current and they work.
The article is concise and well organized, each link sending you to its own page on where to find further information.
The article does not include any images.
There was one comment that was unanswered about same-sex marriage in Portugal. This topic does not differ from what we talk about, because it talks about LGBT Issues, educates people on the topic and focuses on issues in America.
I am unsure of the grade of this article, but I found it with the link Wikiproject. The Strengths are it is very informative but the length of the article, although it is a list and not wordy per say, is very lengthy. I think this article is very well developed.
with four tildes — ~~~~
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.
The Lead does include an introduction paragraph that describes the articles topic and the articles major sections. The lead is very concise and the article is well organized.
The content in this article is relevant and the page was last edited in 2018 so it seems up to date. The article seems to flow well.
The article seems neutral but also seems to be opinions present due to the fact it is an ongoing article where people add "not their favorite members of the LGBTQIA but lasting impacted people". The topics are very detailed and the subject seems to be very inclusive. The article is informative and not persuasive.
There are many sources and they seem to be reliable and statements written seem to be true and informative. The sources are current and they work.
The article is concise and well organized, each link sending you to its own page on where to find further information.
The article does not include any images.
There was one comment that was unanswered about same-sex marriage in Portugal. This topic does not differ from what we talk about, because it talks about LGBT Issues, educates people on the topic and focuses on issues in America.
I am unsure of the grade of this article, but I found it with the link Wikiproject. The Strengths are it is very informative but the length of the article, although it is a list and not wordy per say, is very lengthy. I think this article is very well developed.
with four tildes — ~~~~