Just a reminder to check the page history to see if there is a version without the copyright violation before request G12. GhostOrchid35 ( talk) 10:47, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
GhostOrchid35, thanks for pointing it. I will ensure it from next time onwards. QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 19:17, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, QueerEcofeminist!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
SITH
(talk) 18:53, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
|
Hello, Sureshkhole. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Sexualities(book), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 13:02, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for your contribution, but you have to quote your sources. Please explain also why the person were notable. Xx236 ( talk) 07:38, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Just so you have this... {{ uw-copyright-link}} Jytdog ( talk) 14:58, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
@
Jytdog:
Thanks for your edits! (Note, most of the credit for OAbot goes to User:Pintoch.) I didn't check all of them, but what I saw makes me think you can safely continue this way.
-- Nemo 12:50, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
@
Nemo bis: Sure, I will note the list of sites, And will start the discussions on mrwiki village pump around this. So that we can take it ahead from there. Definitely I will continue with my edits.
Sureshkhole (
talk) 13:07, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
Please don't add links to pubmed when there is already a pmid parameter (not to mention the pmc parameter) as you did here.
More importantly, please do not add links to pages that violate copyright, per WP:COPYLINK, as you did here.
You are responsible for what links you add to WP from OABot.
Please review the links you have added to WP to ensure that there are not more that violate copyright. Thanks. Jytdog ( talk) 14:54, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
Please stop removing important information on Wikipedia while trying to experiment. While your edits might be in good faith, it is not enough for learning to edit. There are plenty places available here to get guidance but don't indulge in attention seeking behavior by removing well referenced sources. You are learning is not good enough reason to vandalize Wikipedia. Next time you indulge in this kind of behavior here, I will bring that fact to administrators here and then you will need to face the music. I am telling again, I have no doubt about your motives and I can see that you are learning! But be careful while editing. Thanks. -- Abhijeet Safai ( talk) 10:53, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Are you getting funding for editing any of the Wikipedia pages on here or on Marathi Wikipedia? Are you involved in any of the organizations which are paying you to edit Wikipedia? Do you have any agenda while editing Wikipedia? Do you have any conflict of interest while editing Wikipedia? If you have any conflict of interest, please note that its your responsibility to declare that conflict of interest. Thank you. -- Abhijeet Safai ( talk) 05:30, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
User_talk:Abhijeet_Safai#Advocacy.
∯WBG
converse 09:35, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
And why do think that the Audi R8 (Type 42) should be deleted? This was simply a split move following a split discussion on the main Audi R8 page. The content has been in existence long before this page was created. You should've added a message on the talk page if you thought there was a violation so it could've been dealt with. U1 quattro TALK 08:54, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
If you had given the source a read , you would've realised that it itself has copied the material from the article at Wikipedia. Your contestation is uncalled for. U1 quattro TALK 08:58, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello QueerEcofeminist. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Selvakannan, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: This is not G11 material, and all G12 issues are just in one paragraph can can be dealt with using revision deletion. Thank you. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 05:02, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi QueerEcofeminist,
Can I ask why you reverted the IP editor at Phyllis Chesler? The information you restored was poorly-sourced (to Breitbart/original reasearch) information in a WP:BLP, introduced to the article by a novice editor just a few days ago. Jayjg (talk) 19:27, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello, No offense I know you're 1000 times experienced than me in Wikipedia editing, I'm just a few days older, Though I see that you have particularly targeted a topic and Tagged AFD on its related films, I see those films are old and pretty much known one or two even I have heard of even though I have never watched any of them. I think those films deserves an article. I checked policies you mentioned in article's entries so yes they aren't within policy but the articles are good, and some readers might need search for this and they would get nothing if they are deleted. -- WikiLover97 ( talk) 21:01, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello and thanks for your edits. Just a heads up, the artists deletion sort is on for sculptors, painters, etchers and the like. See the description on its page-- it's not for film directors, designers etc. ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 14:49, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm AmericanAir88. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Tehran Regional Arbitration Centre, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
AmericanAir88( talk) 18:34, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
Since the title is protected, I have created Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Son Is Gay for you to be able to nominate the article for deletion. Abecedare ( talk) 15:38, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Iseem to have messed things up thoroughly here in trying to execute the move last night.Please look at the current version. Is this the one you wanted to move to draft. ? DGG ( talk ) 08:03, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello, QueerEcofeminist,
I see you are moving a lot of pages from main space into draft space. When you do this, please remember to always notify the article creator (although it seems like you are doing this which is great!). Also, do not leave a redirect behind, going from the encyclopedia to draft space because it will just have to be deleted later that day. And we generally only draftify recently created articles, not ones that are a decade old. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 22:05, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
Let me chime in for a moment. Could you please move Draft:Alameda Council back to Alameda Council? The article was 6 1/2 years old when you moved it, but it did need some strengthening. I added six references and expanded two sections. Thanks. -- evrik ( talk) 19:54, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
I'm attempting a CSD of the redirect and if it clears then I can move it back. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 17:06, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Hey QueerEcofeminist. I wanted to follow up from the recent Sandesh Tupsundre SPI. I know that we have terrible documentation about how to report sock puppetry, and it's particularly difficult in light of a negative CU result. It's necessary in that case to overcome the lack of technical confirmation with extensive behavioral evidence and analysis that's enough to (a) make it probably true that the users are connected and (b) make it unlikely that any innocent explanation fits (such as that all of the users were interested in the same topic for independent reasons). Otherwise, if I were to block, I wouldn't be doing my job as an administrator to ensure that the block tool is not inappropriately used. WP:SIGNS lists common reasons to suspect sockpuppetry, but it's generally necessary to list enough signs to remove most of the doubt that two particular users are connected. You can see a sample SPI I clerked that overcame a negative CU result: the analysis I presented is close to the necessary level of certainty, and in every SPI that I adjudicate, I have to convince myself at that level (even if I don't write it all out) before I will feel certain enough to block. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 21:30, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello, QueerEcofeminist. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.
Please take a moment to review
Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially
the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect. Please remember to follow
post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect
is used. This can be done using
Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to
secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status
can be revoked.
Useful links:
If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Salvio Let's talk about it! 10:10, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
The other day I came across an article you had moved to draft space, Giovanni di Vico, after you had tagged the leftover redirect for deletion. This article dates from 2007, and the original author probably isn't going to come back and fix it in the next six months, so I moved it back to article space. WP:DRAFTIFY sets out the criteria for draftifying articles as part of the new page patrol process, and also makes it clear that draftifying articles as a backdoor route to deletion is inappropriate.
I didn't say anything to you at the time as I figured it was a one-off, but I've just found a whole lot more, all from the past few weeks. This is quite concerning, especially given the thread above.
I've restored all of these articles back to mainspace and am in the process of cleaning them up. If you still feel they need to be deleted, please nominate them for AfD. If there are any further similar articles you have draftified prior to these, please help me restore them to mainspace. Thank you.
Courtesy ping: @ Primefac and Salvio giuliano: – bradv 🍁 03:31, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Due to you your review of Medicare For All, I revisited the link and discovered that what was only supposed to be a redirect to Single-payer healthcare#United States had been hijacked by User:KingOpti101 on 2019-08-18, wherein he/she had pasted code from the target page, overwriting the REDIRECT directive. It is not clear whether this was an act of overt vandalism or simply incompetence. I reverted all of KingOpti101's edits and rolled the page back to the edit of 27 January 2019 by User:Bri. Whatever you "reviewed" did not catch this problem. Please be more vigilant. — Quicksilver (Hydrargyrum) T @ 16:37, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Just a reminder to check the page history to see if there is a version without the copyright violation before request G12. GhostOrchid35 ( talk) 10:47, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
GhostOrchid35, thanks for pointing it. I will ensure it from next time onwards. QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 19:17, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, QueerEcofeminist!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
SITH
(talk) 18:53, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
|
Hello, Sureshkhole. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Sexualities(book), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 13:02, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for your contribution, but you have to quote your sources. Please explain also why the person were notable. Xx236 ( talk) 07:38, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Just so you have this... {{ uw-copyright-link}} Jytdog ( talk) 14:58, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
@
Jytdog:
Thanks for your edits! (Note, most of the credit for OAbot goes to User:Pintoch.) I didn't check all of them, but what I saw makes me think you can safely continue this way.
-- Nemo 12:50, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
@
Nemo bis: Sure, I will note the list of sites, And will start the discussions on mrwiki village pump around this. So that we can take it ahead from there. Definitely I will continue with my edits.
Sureshkhole (
talk) 13:07, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
Please don't add links to pubmed when there is already a pmid parameter (not to mention the pmc parameter) as you did here.
More importantly, please do not add links to pages that violate copyright, per WP:COPYLINK, as you did here.
You are responsible for what links you add to WP from OABot.
Please review the links you have added to WP to ensure that there are not more that violate copyright. Thanks. Jytdog ( talk) 14:54, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
Please stop removing important information on Wikipedia while trying to experiment. While your edits might be in good faith, it is not enough for learning to edit. There are plenty places available here to get guidance but don't indulge in attention seeking behavior by removing well referenced sources. You are learning is not good enough reason to vandalize Wikipedia. Next time you indulge in this kind of behavior here, I will bring that fact to administrators here and then you will need to face the music. I am telling again, I have no doubt about your motives and I can see that you are learning! But be careful while editing. Thanks. -- Abhijeet Safai ( talk) 10:53, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Are you getting funding for editing any of the Wikipedia pages on here or on Marathi Wikipedia? Are you involved in any of the organizations which are paying you to edit Wikipedia? Do you have any agenda while editing Wikipedia? Do you have any conflict of interest while editing Wikipedia? If you have any conflict of interest, please note that its your responsibility to declare that conflict of interest. Thank you. -- Abhijeet Safai ( talk) 05:30, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
User_talk:Abhijeet_Safai#Advocacy.
∯WBG
converse 09:35, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
And why do think that the Audi R8 (Type 42) should be deleted? This was simply a split move following a split discussion on the main Audi R8 page. The content has been in existence long before this page was created. You should've added a message on the talk page if you thought there was a violation so it could've been dealt with. U1 quattro TALK 08:54, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
If you had given the source a read , you would've realised that it itself has copied the material from the article at Wikipedia. Your contestation is uncalled for. U1 quattro TALK 08:58, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello QueerEcofeminist. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Selvakannan, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: This is not G11 material, and all G12 issues are just in one paragraph can can be dealt with using revision deletion. Thank you. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 05:02, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi QueerEcofeminist,
Can I ask why you reverted the IP editor at Phyllis Chesler? The information you restored was poorly-sourced (to Breitbart/original reasearch) information in a WP:BLP, introduced to the article by a novice editor just a few days ago. Jayjg (talk) 19:27, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello, No offense I know you're 1000 times experienced than me in Wikipedia editing, I'm just a few days older, Though I see that you have particularly targeted a topic and Tagged AFD on its related films, I see those films are old and pretty much known one or two even I have heard of even though I have never watched any of them. I think those films deserves an article. I checked policies you mentioned in article's entries so yes they aren't within policy but the articles are good, and some readers might need search for this and they would get nothing if they are deleted. -- WikiLover97 ( talk) 21:01, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello and thanks for your edits. Just a heads up, the artists deletion sort is on for sculptors, painters, etchers and the like. See the description on its page-- it's not for film directors, designers etc. ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 14:49, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm AmericanAir88. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Tehran Regional Arbitration Centre, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
AmericanAir88( talk) 18:34, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
Since the title is protected, I have created Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Son Is Gay for you to be able to nominate the article for deletion. Abecedare ( talk) 15:38, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Iseem to have messed things up thoroughly here in trying to execute the move last night.Please look at the current version. Is this the one you wanted to move to draft. ? DGG ( talk ) 08:03, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello, QueerEcofeminist,
I see you are moving a lot of pages from main space into draft space. When you do this, please remember to always notify the article creator (although it seems like you are doing this which is great!). Also, do not leave a redirect behind, going from the encyclopedia to draft space because it will just have to be deleted later that day. And we generally only draftify recently created articles, not ones that are a decade old. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 22:05, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
Let me chime in for a moment. Could you please move Draft:Alameda Council back to Alameda Council? The article was 6 1/2 years old when you moved it, but it did need some strengthening. I added six references and expanded two sections. Thanks. -- evrik ( talk) 19:54, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
I'm attempting a CSD of the redirect and if it clears then I can move it back. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 17:06, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Hey QueerEcofeminist. I wanted to follow up from the recent Sandesh Tupsundre SPI. I know that we have terrible documentation about how to report sock puppetry, and it's particularly difficult in light of a negative CU result. It's necessary in that case to overcome the lack of technical confirmation with extensive behavioral evidence and analysis that's enough to (a) make it probably true that the users are connected and (b) make it unlikely that any innocent explanation fits (such as that all of the users were interested in the same topic for independent reasons). Otherwise, if I were to block, I wouldn't be doing my job as an administrator to ensure that the block tool is not inappropriately used. WP:SIGNS lists common reasons to suspect sockpuppetry, but it's generally necessary to list enough signs to remove most of the doubt that two particular users are connected. You can see a sample SPI I clerked that overcame a negative CU result: the analysis I presented is close to the necessary level of certainty, and in every SPI that I adjudicate, I have to convince myself at that level (even if I don't write it all out) before I will feel certain enough to block. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 21:30, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello, QueerEcofeminist. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.
Please take a moment to review
Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially
the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect. Please remember to follow
post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect
is used. This can be done using
Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to
secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status
can be revoked.
Useful links:
If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Salvio Let's talk about it! 10:10, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
The other day I came across an article you had moved to draft space, Giovanni di Vico, after you had tagged the leftover redirect for deletion. This article dates from 2007, and the original author probably isn't going to come back and fix it in the next six months, so I moved it back to article space. WP:DRAFTIFY sets out the criteria for draftifying articles as part of the new page patrol process, and also makes it clear that draftifying articles as a backdoor route to deletion is inappropriate.
I didn't say anything to you at the time as I figured it was a one-off, but I've just found a whole lot more, all from the past few weeks. This is quite concerning, especially given the thread above.
I've restored all of these articles back to mainspace and am in the process of cleaning them up. If you still feel they need to be deleted, please nominate them for AfD. If there are any further similar articles you have draftified prior to these, please help me restore them to mainspace. Thank you.
Courtesy ping: @ Primefac and Salvio giuliano: – bradv 🍁 03:31, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Due to you your review of Medicare For All, I revisited the link and discovered that what was only supposed to be a redirect to Single-payer healthcare#United States had been hijacked by User:KingOpti101 on 2019-08-18, wherein he/she had pasted code from the target page, overwriting the REDIRECT directive. It is not clear whether this was an act of overt vandalism or simply incompetence. I reverted all of KingOpti101's edits and rolled the page back to the edit of 27 January 2019 by User:Bri. Whatever you "reviewed" did not catch this problem. Please be more vigilant. — Quicksilver (Hydrargyrum) T @ 16:37, 19 August 2019 (UTC)