This is the user page of Pyrite Pro. Please leave a message and I'll get back to you as soon as possible.
In my new adventures on Wikipedia, I noticed that a lot of vandalism goes undetected. It is my mission to look further and find those little undetected pieces of barbarity. However, I do really appreciate new users being bold, and try to be as supportive as possible.
Browsing to several topics, mostly sociological or ideological articles, I find that a lot of those pages contain some kind of bias in represented ideas, mostly to left-wing ideology [1]. As a member of the scientific community, these pages do not go unnoticed by me, and I do try to be bold and at the same time constructive and civil in discussion. Always assume good faith and assume that I am only interested in NPOV-improvements.
- Ruff - Fixing hundreds of links to this disambiguation page
- Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood - adding contents, copy editing
- Digital zoom - copy editing
- Antifeminism - reference checking, NPOV correction, proposal for restructuring
- Body positivity - major works, improving encyclopedic tone, attention to lead section
- Christian egalitarianism - major works on different sections, NPOV improvement by extending criticism section, adding secondary sources, source verification
- Recent changes - the ongoing and eternal fight against vandalism
- Complementarianism - NPOV improvement, improving worldwide view, source verification
- Misogyny#Christianity - improving contents and NPOV
- ^ Sanger, Larry (14 May 2020). "Wikipedia is Badly Biased". larrysanger.org. Archived from the original on 22 July 2020. Retrieved 25 July 2020.
This is the user page of Pyrite Pro. Please leave a message and I'll get back to you as soon as possible.
In my new adventures on Wikipedia, I noticed that a lot of vandalism goes undetected. It is my mission to look further and find those little undetected pieces of barbarity. However, I do really appreciate new users being bold, and try to be as supportive as possible.
Browsing to several topics, mostly sociological or ideological articles, I find that a lot of those pages contain some kind of bias in represented ideas, mostly to left-wing ideology [1]. As a member of the scientific community, these pages do not go unnoticed by me, and I do try to be bold and at the same time constructive and civil in discussion. Always assume good faith and assume that I am only interested in NPOV-improvements.
- Ruff - Fixing hundreds of links to this disambiguation page
- Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood - adding contents, copy editing
- Digital zoom - copy editing
- Antifeminism - reference checking, NPOV correction, proposal for restructuring
- Body positivity - major works, improving encyclopedic tone, attention to lead section
- Christian egalitarianism - major works on different sections, NPOV improvement by extending criticism section, adding secondary sources, source verification
- Recent changes - the ongoing and eternal fight against vandalism
- Complementarianism - NPOV improvement, improving worldwide view, source verification
- Misogyny#Christianity - improving contents and NPOV
- ^ Sanger, Larry (14 May 2020). "Wikipedia is Badly Biased". larrysanger.org. Archived from the original on 22 July 2020. Retrieved 25 July 2020.