This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current main page. |
That dude ATTACKED me out of nowhere. He may think he can WEASEL out of what he said by what he thinks is a clever framing device, but he in fact asserted that my edit was "nonsense that you fabricated out of thin air" no matter how you spin it.
Why are you piling on? I sense a political bias here. BTW, I've DOUBLE sourced this OBVIOUS claim. Both have been added to the article. Why not spend your valuable time protecting my legit edit from gang-reversion (as a way of gaming the 3r rule) instead of attacking an innocent editor? Thanks!
I also found it curious that you ATTACKED me for ascribing the following to this guy: "misguided political leanings" when it was HE who originally made that statement about me.
Wow! Can you say busted?
Please try to remember -ASSUME good faith. Even if the guy who attacked me (who you are DEFENDING) didn't! 68.41.55.171 ( talk) 02:08, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
This is hilarious. Some liberal wikipedia editor (sorry for the redundancy) viciously attacked me on my talk page. This guy Prodego writes SEVERAL paragraphs rebuking me and only says 'be cool :)" to the other guy.
Thanks for that, man. More documentation of how INCONTROVERTIBLY biased the liberal cabal that RUNS wikipedia truly is! 68.41.55.171 ( talk) 14:59, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi Prodego. I came across this image which was inserted on the article Tarrare diff and I think it is vandalism, copyvio and a probable attack against a person. Given that my experience at Commons deletions is that sometimes they last for a long time could you possibly find an admin there to delete this asap? Thank you. Dr.K. λogos πraxis 02:09, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
I notice that you changed the protection level of the above, citing 'pending changes'. I was wondering if you have visited the article's talk page concerning the proposal posted by Rich Farmbrough? I feel that the change is neither necessary or desirable, as there is no history of IP or new user vandalism. Thanks for your attention. Ohconfucius ¡digame! 04:07, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
"Use a black background with green text" - it's great except when editing protected pages when it seems to be white text on pale pink? Rich Farmbrough, 08:46, 21 June 2010 (UTC).
The Original Barnstar | ||
Prodego, thanks for being a great editor and admin! Your service and dedication to the project is appreciated. Best regards, Swarm Talk 03:47, 25 June 2010 (UTC) |
Is it possible to get an article added to the Pending Changes List? I was hoping this article could be used in the test. It gets a fair amount of vandalism. [1] Thanks. Malke 2010 14:56, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
You might want to watchlist it. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 02:41, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for your help yesteday, I was a quite hot-headed and frustrated and I apologies for my attitude. Lord Metroid ( talk) 12:34, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Hey, just wanted to say thank you for all your help in correcting my block. Im removing it from my talk page now but it will be archived on another site if the problem ever arises again. Thanks again for all you help :) (CK)Lakeshade✽ talk2me 05:12, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Just to let you know: I changed the protection level on the Tupac Shakur back to an indefinite semi-protection, per an RFPP request. It seemed (in my opinion) that the constant heavy vandalism and few edits for reviewers to approve made a case to change the protection back. If you disagree, feel free to restore it and/or drop me a note. -- Tom N (tcncv) talk/ contrib 03:40, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
I notice you decided to lower the semi-protection of the Justin Bieber talk page. Please take a look at a sampling of the anonymous edits that occurred at the talk page subsequent to this:
[2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]
Isn't there some way to direct the edit-protected requests to the nonautoconfirmedtalk subpage? – xeno talk 23:20, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
The user has come to ANI, under an IP address, and asked to be unblocked...see here. Since you were the last blocking admin, I bring this to your attention. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 01:16, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
I took a break from Wikipedia for a few months and while i was gone my account at ACC was suspended for being inactive. Since your an ACC admin i though i'd drop you a message to see if you could reactivate my ACC account. Thanks. Fre h ley 08:11, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
Ah, you goofed up the main page, I couldn't find anything! I, sir, am sincerely disappoint ;) Magog the Ogre ( talk) 04:53, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
I noticed that you lifted the semi-protection and the vandalism started right up again. Is there a reason that I'm not aware of where Zzuuzz wants it left unprotected? -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 05:52, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
A user is using people to attack your Wikipedia page.
He is impersonating others to convince people to vandalize here.
We are not his personal army. We will never forgive him. We will never forget.
HerpaDerpaHerpaDerpa ( talk) 02:37, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current main page. |
That dude ATTACKED me out of nowhere. He may think he can WEASEL out of what he said by what he thinks is a clever framing device, but he in fact asserted that my edit was "nonsense that you fabricated out of thin air" no matter how you spin it.
Why are you piling on? I sense a political bias here. BTW, I've DOUBLE sourced this OBVIOUS claim. Both have been added to the article. Why not spend your valuable time protecting my legit edit from gang-reversion (as a way of gaming the 3r rule) instead of attacking an innocent editor? Thanks!
I also found it curious that you ATTACKED me for ascribing the following to this guy: "misguided political leanings" when it was HE who originally made that statement about me.
Wow! Can you say busted?
Please try to remember -ASSUME good faith. Even if the guy who attacked me (who you are DEFENDING) didn't! 68.41.55.171 ( talk) 02:08, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
This is hilarious. Some liberal wikipedia editor (sorry for the redundancy) viciously attacked me on my talk page. This guy Prodego writes SEVERAL paragraphs rebuking me and only says 'be cool :)" to the other guy.
Thanks for that, man. More documentation of how INCONTROVERTIBLY biased the liberal cabal that RUNS wikipedia truly is! 68.41.55.171 ( talk) 14:59, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi Prodego. I came across this image which was inserted on the article Tarrare diff and I think it is vandalism, copyvio and a probable attack against a person. Given that my experience at Commons deletions is that sometimes they last for a long time could you possibly find an admin there to delete this asap? Thank you. Dr.K. λogos πraxis 02:09, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
I notice that you changed the protection level of the above, citing 'pending changes'. I was wondering if you have visited the article's talk page concerning the proposal posted by Rich Farmbrough? I feel that the change is neither necessary or desirable, as there is no history of IP or new user vandalism. Thanks for your attention. Ohconfucius ¡digame! 04:07, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
"Use a black background with green text" - it's great except when editing protected pages when it seems to be white text on pale pink? Rich Farmbrough, 08:46, 21 June 2010 (UTC).
The Original Barnstar | ||
Prodego, thanks for being a great editor and admin! Your service and dedication to the project is appreciated. Best regards, Swarm Talk 03:47, 25 June 2010 (UTC) |
Is it possible to get an article added to the Pending Changes List? I was hoping this article could be used in the test. It gets a fair amount of vandalism. [1] Thanks. Malke 2010 14:56, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
You might want to watchlist it. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 02:41, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for your help yesteday, I was a quite hot-headed and frustrated and I apologies for my attitude. Lord Metroid ( talk) 12:34, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Hey, just wanted to say thank you for all your help in correcting my block. Im removing it from my talk page now but it will be archived on another site if the problem ever arises again. Thanks again for all you help :) (CK)Lakeshade✽ talk2me 05:12, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Just to let you know: I changed the protection level on the Tupac Shakur back to an indefinite semi-protection, per an RFPP request. It seemed (in my opinion) that the constant heavy vandalism and few edits for reviewers to approve made a case to change the protection back. If you disagree, feel free to restore it and/or drop me a note. -- Tom N (tcncv) talk/ contrib 03:40, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
I notice you decided to lower the semi-protection of the Justin Bieber talk page. Please take a look at a sampling of the anonymous edits that occurred at the talk page subsequent to this:
[2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]
Isn't there some way to direct the edit-protected requests to the nonautoconfirmedtalk subpage? – xeno talk 23:20, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
The user has come to ANI, under an IP address, and asked to be unblocked...see here. Since you were the last blocking admin, I bring this to your attention. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 01:16, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
I took a break from Wikipedia for a few months and while i was gone my account at ACC was suspended for being inactive. Since your an ACC admin i though i'd drop you a message to see if you could reactivate my ACC account. Thanks. Fre h ley 08:11, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
Ah, you goofed up the main page, I couldn't find anything! I, sir, am sincerely disappoint ;) Magog the Ogre ( talk) 04:53, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
I noticed that you lifted the semi-protection and the vandalism started right up again. Is there a reason that I'm not aware of where Zzuuzz wants it left unprotected? -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 05:52, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
A user is using people to attack your Wikipedia page.
He is impersonating others to convince people to vandalize here.
We are not his personal army. We will never forgive him. We will never forget.
HerpaDerpaHerpaDerpa ( talk) 02:37, 18 July 2010 (UTC)