This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current main page. |
best lol of the day. No tops, Prodego. no topS. :-) Feel free to protect the page, not thinking user will be all that productive anytime soon now that us admins have become part of his conspiracy regarding the evil-incarnate that is Israel.... Keeper | 76 04:52, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
I appreciate the effort but I think keeping it semi'd until it hits TFA (and hoping nobody notices the semi once it's up there) is the best way forward. Giggy ( talk) 01:50, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Where was unblocking this user discussed? And why on earth would anyone do it? He was disruptive at PopSinger623, and repeated the exact same disruption as Mparker623. Worse yet, he hasn't shown a single sign at any time in my numerous discussions with him of having the vaguest comprehension of what he has done wrong, and he lied 4 times on unblock requests from the Mparker623 account. What justifies a fourth chance?— Kww( talk) 01:56, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Looking at the article's protection log, this looks like one of these vandalism magnet article. I'd suggest keeping the indefinite semi prot after the 14th. No rush though, I'm pretty sure tomorrow will be hell as far as wheel warring over the protection is concerned. -- lucasbfr talk 09:33, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 2 | 10 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- ragesoss ( talk) 20:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC) §hepBot ( Disable) 20:10, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
I understand your intentions, Prodego, but please do not prot my talk page. I have it unprotected for a reason. - Jéské Couriano ( v^_^v) 04:02, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
What is up tonight with the vandals? Definitely a little more severe than normal. Thank you very much for the blocking work. — Noah 06:24, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Wow. That's a big change. How'd this come about? Any editor not connected should be able to remove. Dloh cierekim 01:22, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Please see this discussion Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion#Change on removing CSD tag and hangon about a change which you introduced and I have reverted. DuncanHill ( talk) 01:33, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 3 | 17 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- ragesoss ( talk) 21:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 00:49, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your participation in
my recent RfA, which failed with 90/38/3; whether you supported, opposed or remained neutral.
Special thanks go out to Moreschi, Dougweller and Frank for nominating me, and I will try to take everyone's comments on board. Thanks again for your participation. I am currently concentrating my efforts on the Wikification WikiProject. It's fun! Please visit the project and wikify a few articles to help clear the backlog. If you can recruit some more participants, then even better. Apologies if you don't like RfA thankspam, this message was delivered by a bot which can't tell whether you want it or not. Feel free to remove it. Itsmejudith ( talk), 22:51, 21 January 2009 (UTC) |
Denbot ( talk) 22:51, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello. I went to log on to the ACC interface for account creation and found out that my account had been suspended. I talked to FastLizard4 about it and was informed that "The reason why you were suspended is because you were filling requests in 17 seconds, which was deemed too fast." When I got online, there weren't any other account creators online. I figured that I would just go through and check on each of the accounts to see if they were legit all at the same time and then approved/denied. This was why I filled multiple requests all at once. I now realize that was a mistake, and that I should have handled each request separately. Is there any way that I can get unsuspended? Or should I just move on to other projects?
-- Randor Xeus. Remember to Be Bold! 06:59, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 4 | 24 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- ragesoss ( talk) 03:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Delivered at 04:48, 25 January 2009 (UTC) by §hepBot ( Disable)
Prodego, would you mind explaining how you came to involved in the discussion at Pallywood? Jaakobou often contacts people off-line and asks them to get involved at pages where his editing is meeting with resistance. Was that the case here?
And by the way, regarding your commentary there, WP:AGF does not require people to assume good faith when there is ample evidence to the contrary. Jaakobou's keen involvement in that article does seem to be aimed at promoting the term, which is, as G-Dett quite rightly points out, an ethnic slur. All the players at this page are very familiar with one another, and I'm sure that IronDuke (who has a wonderful sense of humour) doesn't mind G-Dett's commentary on his game-playing. Tiamut talk 23:42, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
You seem to be enirely unfamiliar with Jaakobou's history, and the fact that WP:ARBPIA was opened in large part because of his actions. I urge you to review the following:
Also, you might want to look at the following WP:AE cases since:
I have since avoided interacting directly Jaakobou. Pallywood is a page on my watchlist that both of us use to edit. After seeing your comments there, I wondered whether you were asked by Jaakobou to monitor that page or not. That's what brought me here. I simply want a direct answer to that question. Can you please give me one? Thanks. Tiamut talk 13:12, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
My RFA passed today at 150/48/6. I wanted to thank you for weighing in on the RFA--I will do everything I can to uphold the policies of this site, and try to make it a better place. All the comments, questions, and in particular the opposes I plan to work on and learn from, so that I can hopefully always do the right thing with the huge trust given to me. rootology ( C)( T) 08:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC) |
Hi, Prodego. Thanks for your comment.-- Mywood ( talk) 10:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 5 | 31 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- ragesoss ( talk) 20:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 21:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current main page. |
best lol of the day. No tops, Prodego. no topS. :-) Feel free to protect the page, not thinking user will be all that productive anytime soon now that us admins have become part of his conspiracy regarding the evil-incarnate that is Israel.... Keeper | 76 04:52, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
I appreciate the effort but I think keeping it semi'd until it hits TFA (and hoping nobody notices the semi once it's up there) is the best way forward. Giggy ( talk) 01:50, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Where was unblocking this user discussed? And why on earth would anyone do it? He was disruptive at PopSinger623, and repeated the exact same disruption as Mparker623. Worse yet, he hasn't shown a single sign at any time in my numerous discussions with him of having the vaguest comprehension of what he has done wrong, and he lied 4 times on unblock requests from the Mparker623 account. What justifies a fourth chance?— Kww( talk) 01:56, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Looking at the article's protection log, this looks like one of these vandalism magnet article. I'd suggest keeping the indefinite semi prot after the 14th. No rush though, I'm pretty sure tomorrow will be hell as far as wheel warring over the protection is concerned. -- lucasbfr talk 09:33, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 2 | 10 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- ragesoss ( talk) 20:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC) §hepBot ( Disable) 20:10, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
I understand your intentions, Prodego, but please do not prot my talk page. I have it unprotected for a reason. - Jéské Couriano ( v^_^v) 04:02, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
What is up tonight with the vandals? Definitely a little more severe than normal. Thank you very much for the blocking work. — Noah 06:24, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Wow. That's a big change. How'd this come about? Any editor not connected should be able to remove. Dloh cierekim 01:22, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Please see this discussion Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion#Change on removing CSD tag and hangon about a change which you introduced and I have reverted. DuncanHill ( talk) 01:33, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 3 | 17 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- ragesoss ( talk) 21:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 00:49, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your participation in
my recent RfA, which failed with 90/38/3; whether you supported, opposed or remained neutral.
Special thanks go out to Moreschi, Dougweller and Frank for nominating me, and I will try to take everyone's comments on board. Thanks again for your participation. I am currently concentrating my efforts on the Wikification WikiProject. It's fun! Please visit the project and wikify a few articles to help clear the backlog. If you can recruit some more participants, then even better. Apologies if you don't like RfA thankspam, this message was delivered by a bot which can't tell whether you want it or not. Feel free to remove it. Itsmejudith ( talk), 22:51, 21 January 2009 (UTC) |
Denbot ( talk) 22:51, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello. I went to log on to the ACC interface for account creation and found out that my account had been suspended. I talked to FastLizard4 about it and was informed that "The reason why you were suspended is because you were filling requests in 17 seconds, which was deemed too fast." When I got online, there weren't any other account creators online. I figured that I would just go through and check on each of the accounts to see if they were legit all at the same time and then approved/denied. This was why I filled multiple requests all at once. I now realize that was a mistake, and that I should have handled each request separately. Is there any way that I can get unsuspended? Or should I just move on to other projects?
-- Randor Xeus. Remember to Be Bold! 06:59, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 4 | 24 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- ragesoss ( talk) 03:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Delivered at 04:48, 25 January 2009 (UTC) by §hepBot ( Disable)
Prodego, would you mind explaining how you came to involved in the discussion at Pallywood? Jaakobou often contacts people off-line and asks them to get involved at pages where his editing is meeting with resistance. Was that the case here?
And by the way, regarding your commentary there, WP:AGF does not require people to assume good faith when there is ample evidence to the contrary. Jaakobou's keen involvement in that article does seem to be aimed at promoting the term, which is, as G-Dett quite rightly points out, an ethnic slur. All the players at this page are very familiar with one another, and I'm sure that IronDuke (who has a wonderful sense of humour) doesn't mind G-Dett's commentary on his game-playing. Tiamut talk 23:42, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
You seem to be enirely unfamiliar with Jaakobou's history, and the fact that WP:ARBPIA was opened in large part because of his actions. I urge you to review the following:
Also, you might want to look at the following WP:AE cases since:
I have since avoided interacting directly Jaakobou. Pallywood is a page on my watchlist that both of us use to edit. After seeing your comments there, I wondered whether you were asked by Jaakobou to monitor that page or not. That's what brought me here. I simply want a direct answer to that question. Can you please give me one? Thanks. Tiamut talk 13:12, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
My RFA passed today at 150/48/6. I wanted to thank you for weighing in on the RFA--I will do everything I can to uphold the policies of this site, and try to make it a better place. All the comments, questions, and in particular the opposes I plan to work on and learn from, so that I can hopefully always do the right thing with the huge trust given to me. rootology ( C)( T) 08:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC) |
Hi, Prodego. Thanks for your comment.-- Mywood ( talk) 10:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 5 | 31 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- ragesoss ( talk) 20:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 21:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC)