This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current main page. |
I'm sorry for callin khaosworks names but i'm sure its him whos sending me extremely abusive and anti-catholic messages. Who else would argue about the issue. How did he even get my email address? action must be taken against that anti-catholic. this is discrimination! -- Daniel Supreme 16:59, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Do you think it would be okay to change a username from SafeLibraries.org to SafeLibraries as no one might think it's a web site and I would no longer violate policy? -- SafeLibraries 03:22, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 43 | 23 October 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
Report from the Finnish Wikipedia | News and notes: Donation currencies added, milestones |
Wikipedia in the news | Features and admins |
The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:30, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you are currently listed as a coach in the 'Pending' section of the coaching box.
Thank you for helping with admin coaching! H ig hway Grammar Enforcer! 22:50, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 44 | 30 October 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:27, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
For some reason my name has been removed from the list of authorized users. I was added by Betacommand here [1], and he welcommed me here [2]. I had difficulties using it, did everything I could myself, was unable to, so I requested assistance here [3]. Instead of assistance, I was removed from the list. Because I have had difficulties on wikipedia recieving help from administrators when requested, this message is in essence a generic template I am writing on all moderators' talk pages and discussion boards in the hopes of recieving if nothing else a response - ideally, however, a solution. Thank you very much and apologies for my impatience. Gregorof/ (T) 05:31, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 45 | 6 November 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:26, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 46 | 13 November 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:21, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
I understand your concern but once again there has been a jumping into conclusion. I use test 3 and then test 4 and then report the user when i do vandal fighting. I call it a three strike system.
Also, the last vandal attacks i have seen have shown some pretty constructive attacks. Some have destablized senstive articles while others vandalise and then revert their attack so no one is none the wiser.
Rather than tighting anti-vandlism, i think issuing warnings concerning article senstivity should be made. Special semi-protections may also be neccesarry.
I am sorry if my work is interfering with Wikipedia. - Dynamo_ace Talk
How can we really combat vandlism without putting the community at risk?- Dynamo_ace Talk
Thanks for your notice. I knew it was a forlorn chance to apply before I had 250 mainspace edits but I thought it worth a shot. A friend now uses it and I'm very impressed with its abilities and power. I'll apply again when I'm over the minimum level. Cheers. -- Pigman ( talk • contribs) 20:21, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
i was wandering if there was a welcoming committee and if so how could i join? And i wanted to know how to get a contents for talk pages and thanks for the welcoming committee info i joined. sorry but one more question how do i get user boxes like the ones that i can be reached by e-mail and like to hike and that stuff(im refering to saxteacher's userpage). And also does it have to be main space edits or just 250 total edits?-- The Dwarf_King 21:29, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
What are mainspace edits?-- The Dwarf_King 22:26, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
I believe my cookies are enabled in IE7. I checked and they are on. I tried again.. same results. -- Deenoe 23:07, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi, please excuse the intrusion. I saw your name on the list of verified admins. Was wondering if you had any idea what happened to Shauns's Open Proxy Checker - I was using it to identify proxies but it's been dead for the last two weeks or so. It'd be great if you can point me to alternative sites which can help identify an open proxy as such. tnx! Odedee 04:06, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 47 | 20 November 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:44, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I can't log in to the new version of VP. All I get is the message that I'm not on the user list, even though I am (or at least should be, as I was approved on September 24: [4]). Perhaps you could help. -- AAikio 08:06, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current main page. |
I'm sorry for callin khaosworks names but i'm sure its him whos sending me extremely abusive and anti-catholic messages. Who else would argue about the issue. How did he even get my email address? action must be taken against that anti-catholic. this is discrimination! -- Daniel Supreme 16:59, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Do you think it would be okay to change a username from SafeLibraries.org to SafeLibraries as no one might think it's a web site and I would no longer violate policy? -- SafeLibraries 03:22, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 43 | 23 October 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
Report from the Finnish Wikipedia | News and notes: Donation currencies added, milestones |
Wikipedia in the news | Features and admins |
The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:30, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you are currently listed as a coach in the 'Pending' section of the coaching box.
Thank you for helping with admin coaching! H ig hway Grammar Enforcer! 22:50, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 44 | 30 October 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:27, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
For some reason my name has been removed from the list of authorized users. I was added by Betacommand here [1], and he welcommed me here [2]. I had difficulties using it, did everything I could myself, was unable to, so I requested assistance here [3]. Instead of assistance, I was removed from the list. Because I have had difficulties on wikipedia recieving help from administrators when requested, this message is in essence a generic template I am writing on all moderators' talk pages and discussion boards in the hopes of recieving if nothing else a response - ideally, however, a solution. Thank you very much and apologies for my impatience. Gregorof/ (T) 05:31, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 45 | 6 November 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:26, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 46 | 13 November 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:21, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
I understand your concern but once again there has been a jumping into conclusion. I use test 3 and then test 4 and then report the user when i do vandal fighting. I call it a three strike system.
Also, the last vandal attacks i have seen have shown some pretty constructive attacks. Some have destablized senstive articles while others vandalise and then revert their attack so no one is none the wiser.
Rather than tighting anti-vandlism, i think issuing warnings concerning article senstivity should be made. Special semi-protections may also be neccesarry.
I am sorry if my work is interfering with Wikipedia. - Dynamo_ace Talk
How can we really combat vandlism without putting the community at risk?- Dynamo_ace Talk
Thanks for your notice. I knew it was a forlorn chance to apply before I had 250 mainspace edits but I thought it worth a shot. A friend now uses it and I'm very impressed with its abilities and power. I'll apply again when I'm over the minimum level. Cheers. -- Pigman ( talk • contribs) 20:21, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
i was wandering if there was a welcoming committee and if so how could i join? And i wanted to know how to get a contents for talk pages and thanks for the welcoming committee info i joined. sorry but one more question how do i get user boxes like the ones that i can be reached by e-mail and like to hike and that stuff(im refering to saxteacher's userpage). And also does it have to be main space edits or just 250 total edits?-- The Dwarf_King 21:29, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
What are mainspace edits?-- The Dwarf_King 22:26, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
I believe my cookies are enabled in IE7. I checked and they are on. I tried again.. same results. -- Deenoe 23:07, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi, please excuse the intrusion. I saw your name on the list of verified admins. Was wondering if you had any idea what happened to Shauns's Open Proxy Checker - I was using it to identify proxies but it's been dead for the last two weeks or so. It'd be great if you can point me to alternative sites which can help identify an open proxy as such. tnx! Odedee 04:06, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 47 | 20 November 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:44, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I can't log in to the new version of VP. All I get is the message that I'm not on the user list, even though I am (or at least should be, as I was approved on September 24: [4]). Perhaps you could help. -- AAikio 08:06, 22 November 2006 (UTC)